This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.
Doctor of Economic Sciences, Senior Researcher, Chief Researcher at the Institute of Industrial Economics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine. Yuri Kharazishvili was born on the 4-th of November 1946, in Ostrogozhsk, Voronezh region (Russia).– He received his secondary education in Georgia, in Tbilisi. In 1969 he graduated from Kyiv Institute of Civil Aviation. In 1975 defended his Ph.D. thesis in the specialty 05.13.13 "Computing". From 1977 to 1979 he worked in the Design Bureau "Luch" of the Artyom Production Association in the Advanced Development Department as a first category design engineer. From 1979 to 1984 he worked in the Kiev branch of the All-Union Scientific Research Institute of Radio Equipment in the position of a senior researcher. From 1984 to 1991 he worked in the “Yuzhnoye” State Design Office in a specialized department as the head of the sector, head of the department. In 2005 to 2010 he worked at the State Scientific Research Institute for Informatization and Economic Modeling of the Ministry of Economy of Ukraine as first deputy director for scientific work, where he prepared and defended his doctoral dissertation in 2009 on the topic "System modeling of levers of regulation of economic growth". In 2010 to 2015, he worked at the National Institute for Strategic Studies as a chief researcher in the department of macroeconomic forecasting and shadow economy research.
The current approaches to estimating the level of energy security are based on applying a comprehensive approach to selecting the factors that affect energy security and the dynamics of processes in this domain. This article reveals the application of the model of energy security estimation and strategizing based on the systemic description of energy security as an object of management: the integral system, elements and connections, functions, processes, and the system’s material. At the same time, this model is able to take into account the dynamics of technological, political, economic, and other factors operating in the country and on the global arena. The energy security estimation model developed uses a modern methodology of integrated estimation: a multiplicative form of the integrated index, a formalized definition of the safe existence limits in order to provide scientific substantiation of the threshold vector, a modified rationing method, the principal components method, and the sliding matrix method to substantiate dynamic weighting coefficients. The paper demonstrates the systemic approach application to shaping strategic goals in the energy security domain in the context of sustainable development; the trajectory of energy security development is calculated by the method of strategizing that applies the principle “future is determined by the trajectory to the future” instead of the classical forecasting “past determines the future”. In general, the article shows the possibility of unifying the process of formalizing energy security (according to the needs of the researcher: country, industry, energy network, supply chain) as an object of management, estimating energy security status, and strategizing the regulatory sphere transformation in accordance with the target values for monitoring the effectiveness of management.
Yurii Kharazishvili; Aleksy Kwilinski; Oleksandr Sukhodolia; Henryk Dzwigol; Dmytro Bobro; Janusz Kotowicz. The Systemic Approach for Estimating and Strategizing Energy Security: The Case of Ukraine. Energies 2021, 14, 2126 .
AMA StyleYurii Kharazishvili, Aleksy Kwilinski, Oleksandr Sukhodolia, Henryk Dzwigol, Dmytro Bobro, Janusz Kotowicz. The Systemic Approach for Estimating and Strategizing Energy Security: The Case of Ukraine. Energies. 2021; 14 (8):2126.
Chicago/Turabian StyleYurii Kharazishvili; Aleksy Kwilinski; Oleksandr Sukhodolia; Henryk Dzwigol; Dmytro Bobro; Janusz Kotowicz. 2021. "The Systemic Approach for Estimating and Strategizing Energy Security: The Case of Ukraine." Energies 14, no. 8: 2126.
Based on the analysis of the quantitative assessment of the influence of the factors of innovative activity on the dynamics of economic development and the endogenous determination of its contribution to the economic growth of the country, it is revealed that in foreign researches it is identified with the concept of the influence of scientific and technological progress. However, the impact of innovative factors on economic growth is not considered separately. Attempts of such a definition in Ukrainian researches are limited to well-known approaches: methods of integral assessment, methods of expert assessments, the method of multipliers, econometric models. Most of the approaches considered are focused on defining the innovative impact on economic development, rather than on economic growth. The main tool for assessing the role and innovative contribution to economic growth is the aggregate supply function model, usually based on the Cobb-Douglas production function. The analysis of the approaches used revealed a number of comments on econometric approaches. In contrast to this, an approach is proposed based on the neoclassical production function of Cobb-Douglas with a constant return to scale in the form of J. Tinbergen, with technical progress neutral according to J. Hicks, decreasing marginal productivity of macrofactors with limited interchangeability, which provides a causal functional (and not a statistical) relationship between input and output variables; does not require long time series. It is characterized by dynamic coefficients of elasticity, capital utilization rate and taking into account the innovation factor in each separate period. The innovation factor includes: the gross domestic expenditures on research and development, the expenditures on innovation, general expenditures on education. To define the contribution of formal innovation factor in economic growth applied "method of Solow residual", which by taking the logarithm and obtaining logarithmic derivatives in the production function, provides a formalized information about the contribution of each factor to economic growth and allows to develop the necessary regulatory measures. The method has been tested at the level of the country and old industrial regions of Ukraine: Dnepropetrovsk, Zaporozhye and Kirovograd regions of the Dnieper economic region of Ukraine. The role, importance and influence of the main factors of economic growth along with innovative ones on the part of the aggregate supply are considered and the cost-effectiveness of innovative factors is estimated.
Yuri M. Kharazishvili; Institute of Industrial Economics of the NAS of Ukraine; Vyacheslav I. Lyashenko. Accounting for innovative factors of economic growth in the production function of Cobb-Douglas (on the example of old industrial regions of Ukraine). Economy of Industry 2021, 1, 5 -19.
AMA StyleYuri M. Kharazishvili, Institute of Industrial Economics of the NAS of Ukraine, Vyacheslav I. Lyashenko. Accounting for innovative factors of economic growth in the production function of Cobb-Douglas (on the example of old industrial regions of Ukraine). Economy of Industry. 2021; 1 (93):5-19.
Chicago/Turabian StyleYuri M. Kharazishvili; Institute of Industrial Economics of the NAS of Ukraine; Vyacheslav I. Lyashenko. 2021. "Accounting for innovative factors of economic growth in the production function of Cobb-Douglas (on the example of old industrial regions of Ukraine)." Economy of Industry 1, no. 93: 5-19.
The article is dedicated to methods of integrating the safety of air transport in the mechanism of interaction between sustainable development goals and strategic management of sustanable development security through managerial, functional, and informational links between subsytems of sustainable development and different hierarchal levels of safety. This determines the place and role of aviation safety in ensuring fundamental national interests, i.e. sustainable development of national economy. The multifactor hierarchal model detailing the level of safety of air transport was developed in accordance with the system approach in the context of sustainable development and combines the economic and technological, social, and environmental components. It is proposed to consider a total of 7 components and 29 indicators that include shadow economy aspects, without which the current conditions cannot be estimated accurately. The boundaries of safe existence have been defined for all indicators using Student’s t-test. The conducted modelling has determined the current values of all indicators and the safety level of air transport as a whole. Identification has been carried out in accordance with the latest assessment methodology, including the multiplicative integral indices, modified method of normalization and formalized determination of dynamic weights. The list of threats and their severity have been determined using two criteria. Distance from the point of sustainable development, i.e. average value of the «homeostatic plateau», was used to identify the list and importance of threats, while the severity of threats was calculated using elasticity coefficients. The calculations show that the safety of air transport depends foremost on the social component, as well as economic and technological development of aviation.
Dmytro Bugayko; Yuri Kharazishvili; Viachelsav Liashenko; Aleksy Kwilinski. SYSTEMIC APPROACH TO DETERMINING THE SAFETY OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF AIR TRANSPORT: INDICATORS, LEVEL, THREATS. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN ECONOMY 2021, 146 -182.
AMA StyleDmytro Bugayko, Yuri Kharazishvili, Viachelsav Liashenko, Aleksy Kwilinski. SYSTEMIC APPROACH TO DETERMINING THE SAFETY OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF AIR TRANSPORT: INDICATORS, LEVEL, THREATS. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN ECONOMY. 2021; (Vol 20, No):146-182.
Chicago/Turabian StyleDmytro Bugayko; Yuri Kharazishvili; Viachelsav Liashenko; Aleksy Kwilinski. 2021. "SYSTEMIC APPROACH TO DETERMINING THE SAFETY OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF AIR TRANSPORT: INDICATORS, LEVEL, THREATS." JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN ECONOMY , no. Vol 20, No: 146-182.
”. Aviation safety is an important component of the concept of general national security, the system of personal security, ecological and public safety and transport safety from external and internal threats. Maintaining an acceptable level of national aviation safety is a priority for the industry. In the context of globalization, ecological safety is becoming especially important. World leaders gathered at the United Nations (UN) and adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. It is a plan of action aimed at achieving global sustainable development in economic, social and environmental areas, which ensures that no UN member state is left behind. The 17 sustainable development goals on the 2030 Agenda can be used as benchmarks for the coordinated development of UN member states. One of the most important goals for the global survival of humankind is Goal 13 “Climate Change”. In order to find an adequate answer to this challenge, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has identified the following areas that can contribute to the attainment of the global aspirational goal: aircraft related technology and standards; improved air traffic management and operational improvements, development and deployment of sustainable aviation fuel and the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). The implementation of CORSIA is carried out not only at the global level, the initiative requires the search for effective management solutions at the national level. Statistics on the activities of the aviation industry of Ukraine indicate its stable development. However, unfortunately, the dynamic growth of air traffic entails an increase in emissions of chemical elements into the atmosphere, which are a real threat to the environment and can contribute to climate change processes. The main tool for ensuring ecological safety tasks is proactive risk management. The development of proactive tools for environmental risk management is relevant and has practical implications for sustainable development, both in the industry in particular and for the state as a whole. The articles offer the author's approaches to the identification of air transport ecological component level.
Dmytro Bugayko; Yuri Kharazishvili; Anna Antonova; Zenon Zamiar. Identification of air transport ecological component level in the context of ensuring sustainable development of the national economy. Electronic Scientific Journal Intellectualization of Logistics and Supply Chain Management #1 2020 2020, 1, 38 -53.
AMA StyleDmytro Bugayko, Yuri Kharazishvili, Anna Antonova, Zenon Zamiar. Identification of air transport ecological component level in the context of ensuring sustainable development of the national economy. Electronic Scientific Journal Intellectualization of Logistics and Supply Chain Management #1 2020. 2020; 1 (3):38-53.
Chicago/Turabian StyleDmytro Bugayko; Yuri Kharazishvili; Anna Antonova; Zenon Zamiar. 2020. "Identification of air transport ecological component level in the context of ensuring sustainable development of the national economy." Electronic Scientific Journal Intellectualization of Logistics and Supply Chain Management #1 2020 1, no. 3: 38-53.
The paper is devoted to identifying the level of social safety of society, taking into account the indicators of shadow economy, and developing its strategic scenarios as a component of sustainable development of Ukraine by 2030. The authors used the modern methods of normalisation, threshold vector determination, and dynamic weight coefficients in order to identify the level of social safety of society. The authors developed the structure and a list of indicators considering three components of social safety: The standard of living, the demographic component, and the quality of life. This method allows determining the list and severity of threats, comparing the dynamics of integral indices with integral thresholds in one scale, identifying the state of security, and defining strategic goals and strategies. The suggested approach is universal and can be used by any country, region, economic activity, or business to develop evidence-based medium-to-long-term sustainable development scenarios.
Yurii Kharazishvili; Aleksy Kwilinski; Olena Grishnova; Henryk Dzwigol. Social Safety of Society for Developing Countries to Meet Sustainable Development Standards: Indicators, Level, Strategic Benchmarks (with Calculations Based on the Case Study of Ukraine). Sustainability 2020, 12, 8953 .
AMA StyleYurii Kharazishvili, Aleksy Kwilinski, Olena Grishnova, Henryk Dzwigol. Social Safety of Society for Developing Countries to Meet Sustainable Development Standards: Indicators, Level, Strategic Benchmarks (with Calculations Based on the Case Study of Ukraine). Sustainability. 2020; 12 (21):8953.
Chicago/Turabian StyleYurii Kharazishvili; Aleksy Kwilinski; Olena Grishnova; Henryk Dzwigol. 2020. "Social Safety of Society for Developing Countries to Meet Sustainable Development Standards: Indicators, Level, Strategic Benchmarks (with Calculations Based on the Case Study of Ukraine)." Sustainability 12, no. 21: 8953.
Oleksandr Sukhodolia; National Institute for Strategic Studies; Yurii Kharazishvili; Dmytro Bobro. METHODOLOGICAL BASIS FOR ASESSING THE LEVEL AND STRATEGIC PLANING OF THE ENERGY SECURITY OF UKRAINE. Economy of Ukraine 2020, 2020, 20 -42.
AMA StyleOleksandr Sukhodolia, National Institute for Strategic Studies, Yurii Kharazishvili, Dmytro Bobro. METHODOLOGICAL BASIS FOR ASESSING THE LEVEL AND STRATEGIC PLANING OF THE ENERGY SECURITY OF UKRAINE. Economy of Ukraine. 2020; 2020 (6):20-42.
Chicago/Turabian StyleOleksandr Sukhodolia; National Institute for Strategic Studies; Yurii Kharazishvili; Dmytro Bobro. 2020. "METHODOLOGICAL BASIS FOR ASESSING THE LEVEL AND STRATEGIC PLANING OF THE ENERGY SECURITY OF UKRAINE." Economy of Ukraine 2020, no. 6: 20-42.
The article determines the list of indicators of the standard of living of the population as a component of social security, including shadow indicators without which the assessment of living standards is inadequate in reality. The authors substantiate the limits of safe existence through the definition of the vector of the indicators’ threshold values. The paper identified the current state of the standards of living in Ukraine, Georgia and Poland through the integrated assessment from the standpoint of security, as well as outlined the most important threats. The researchers also scientifically substantiated the strategic benchmarks for the indicators of the standards of living considering three development scenarios that provide the fulfilment of the established sustainable development goals by means of adaptive regulation methods available in the control theory.
Yurii Kharazishvili; Olena Grishnova; Bożena Kamińska. Standards of living in Ukraine, Georgia, and Poland: identification and strategic planning. Virtual Economics 2019, 2, 7 -36.
AMA StyleYurii Kharazishvili, Olena Grishnova, Bożena Kamińska. Standards of living in Ukraine, Georgia, and Poland: identification and strategic planning. Virtual Economics. 2019; 2 (2):7-36.
Chicago/Turabian StyleYurii Kharazishvili; Olena Grishnova; Bożena Kamińska. 2019. "Standards of living in Ukraine, Georgia, and Poland: identification and strategic planning." Virtual Economics 2, no. 2: 7-36.
The article considers strategic scenarios of sustainable development and institutional conditions for achievement. В статье рассмотрены стратегические сценарии устойчивого развития и институциональные условия достижения. У статті розглянуто стратегічні сценарії сталого розвитку та інституційні умови досягнення.
Yu. Kharazishvili; Institute of Industrial Economics of the NAS of Ukraine; V. Liashenko. Strategic scenarios for sustainable development and institutional conditions for achievement. Economic Herald of the Donbas 2019, 1 .
AMA StyleYu. Kharazishvili, Institute of Industrial Economics of the NAS of Ukraine, V. Liashenko. Strategic scenarios for sustainable development and institutional conditions for achievement. Economic Herald of the Donbas. 2019; (3 (57)):1.
Chicago/Turabian StyleYu. Kharazishvili; Institute of Industrial Economics of the NAS of Ukraine; V. Liashenko. 2019. "Strategic scenarios for sustainable development and institutional conditions for achievement." Economic Herald of the Donbas , no. 3 (57): 1.
The authors consider the social security as a state of social sphere, which ensures high quality of life of the population (material level and social components), protection of the basic vital demographic-recovery processes, possibility of obtaining the high-quality education and the absence of threats to health and life of a person. The main indicator of quality of life – poverty level according to various methods of determination – is studied in detail. Imperfection of existing approaches to reflect the real state of poverty in Ukraine is substantiated. The definition of poverty level is proposed as a share of the population whose equivalent total costs is lower than the actual living wage, calculated as 50% of the average wage. According to this approach, the poverty level in Ukraine is about 60%, reflecting the real state. The integral index of quality of life in Ukraine, calculated on the basis of modern methodology, indicates its unsatisfactory condition throughout the analyzed period; this can be overcome only on the basis of sustainable development. The most important threats are outlined and ranked for the weight of influence. It is determined that the root cause of all threats to the quality of life, as well as social security in general, is the unacceptably low level of remuneration in output, which is significantly lagging behind similar indicators of economically developed countries and stipulates the corresponding humiliating social standards. In this regard, it is proposed to change the social policy by law through redistribution of income between labor and capital to the average level of the economically developed EU countries: labor – 29%, capital – 71%.
Yurii Kharazishvili; National Institute for Strategic Studies; Olena Grishnova; Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE SYSTEM OF SOCIAL SECURITY OF UKRAINE: INDICATORS, LEVEL, THREATS. Economy of Ukraine 2018, 2018, 157 -171.
AMA StyleYurii Kharazishvili, National Institute for Strategic Studies, Olena Grishnova, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE SYSTEM OF SOCIAL SECURITY OF UKRAINE: INDICATORS, LEVEL, THREATS. Economy of Ukraine. 2018; 2018 (11-12):157-171.
Chicago/Turabian StyleYurii Kharazishvili; National Institute for Strategic Studies; Olena Grishnova; Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. 2018. "QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE SYSTEM OF SOCIAL SECURITY OF UKRAINE: INDICATORS, LEVEL, THREATS." Economy of Ukraine 2018, no. 11-12: 157-171.
Yurii Kharazishvili; Andrii Shevchenko. Strategic planning for sustainable development from the standpoint of economic security оn the example of the railway transport of Ukraine. Research Papers in Economics and Finance 2018, 2, 7 -17.
AMA StyleYurii Kharazishvili, Andrii Shevchenko. Strategic planning for sustainable development from the standpoint of economic security оn the example of the railway transport of Ukraine. Research Papers in Economics and Finance. 2018; 2 (4):7-17.
Chicago/Turabian StyleYurii Kharazishvili; Andrii Shevchenko. 2018. "Strategic planning for sustainable development from the standpoint of economic security оn the example of the railway transport of Ukraine." Research Papers in Economics and Finance 2, no. 4: 7-17.