This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.
Matej Nikšič; Stefania Ragozino; Alenka Fikfak. Public spaces and local life: Questioning the participatory approaches. Urbani izziv 2018, 29, 3 -8.
AMA StyleMatej Nikšič, Stefania Ragozino, Alenka Fikfak. Public spaces and local life: Questioning the participatory approaches. Urbani izziv. 2018; 29 (supplement):3-8.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMatej Nikšič; Stefania Ragozino; Alenka Fikfak. 2018. "Public spaces and local life: Questioning the participatory approaches." Urbani izziv 29, no. supplement: 3-8.
Matej Nikšič; Biba Tominc; Nina Goršič. Revealing residents’ shared values through crowdsourced photography: Experimental approach in participatory urban regeneration. Urbani izziv 2018, 29, 29 -42.
AMA StyleMatej Nikšič, Biba Tominc, Nina Goršič. Revealing residents’ shared values through crowdsourced photography: Experimental approach in participatory urban regeneration. Urbani izziv. 2018; 29 (supplement):29-42.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMatej Nikšič; Biba Tominc; Nina Goršič. 2018. "Revealing residents’ shared values through crowdsourced photography: Experimental approach in participatory urban regeneration." Urbani izziv 29, no. supplement: 29-42.
This paper discusses how the structure of urban public open space is created and interpreted in the mental image of its users in the case of Ljubljana, Slovenia. It reveals how spatially continuous urban open space is physically interconnected into the overall spatial structure of the city and how it is defined by a variety of the built form components. The question is how such space is present in the mental image of users and whether and how such space is structured into sub-units by its users. The paper aims to establish what its dimensions are, how it is divided into separate units at a mental level, and what the perceived hierarchical relations between such units are, in terms of spatial, functional and intangible characteristics of space that conditions this perception. It is argued that both the overall spatial structure of the city and its constituent components play an important role in how users conceptualize urban open public space.
Matej Nikšič; Georgia Butina Watson. Urban public open space in the mental image of users: the elements connecting urban public open spaces in a spatial network. Journal of Urban Design 2017, 23, 1 -24.
AMA StyleMatej Nikšič, Georgia Butina Watson. Urban public open space in the mental image of users: the elements connecting urban public open spaces in a spatial network. Journal of Urban Design. 2017; 23 (6):1-24.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMatej Nikšič; Georgia Butina Watson. 2017. "Urban public open space in the mental image of users: the elements connecting urban public open spaces in a spatial network." Journal of Urban Design 23, no. 6: 1-24.
Citizens are increasingly becoming an important source of geographic information, sometimes entering domains that had until recently been the exclusive realm of authoritative agencies. This activity has a very diverse character as it can, amongst other things, be active or passive, involve spatial or aspatial data and the data provided can be variable in terms of key attributes such as format, description and quality. Unsurprisingly, therefore, there are a variety of terms used to describe data arising from citizens. In this article, the expressions used to describe citizen sensing of geographic information are reviewed and their use over time explored, prior to categorizing them and highlighting key issues in the current state of the subject. The latter involved a review of ~100 Internet sites with particular focus on their thematic topic, the nature of the data and issues such as incentives for contributors. This review suggests that most sites involve active rather than passive contribution, with citizens typically motivated by the desire to aid a worthy cause, often receiving little training. As such, this article provides a snapshot of the role of citizens in crowdsourcing geographic information and a guide to the current status of this rapidly emerging and evolving subject.
Linda See; Peter Mooney; Giles M. Foody; Lucy Bastin; Alexis Comber; Jacinto Estima; Steffen Fritz; Norman Kerle; Bin Jiang; Mari Laakso; Hai-Ying Liu; Grega Milčinski; Matej Nikšič; Marco Painho; Andrea Pődör; Ana-Maria Olteanu-Raimond; Martin Rutzinger. Crowdsourcing, Citizen Science or Volunteered Geographic Information? The Current State of Crowdsourced Geographic Information. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2016, 5, 55 .
AMA StyleLinda See, Peter Mooney, Giles M. Foody, Lucy Bastin, Alexis Comber, Jacinto Estima, Steffen Fritz, Norman Kerle, Bin Jiang, Mari Laakso, Hai-Ying Liu, Grega Milčinski, Matej Nikšič, Marco Painho, Andrea Pődör, Ana-Maria Olteanu-Raimond, Martin Rutzinger. Crowdsourcing, Citizen Science or Volunteered Geographic Information? The Current State of Crowdsourced Geographic Information. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2016; 5 (5):55.
Chicago/Turabian StyleLinda See; Peter Mooney; Giles M. Foody; Lucy Bastin; Alexis Comber; Jacinto Estima; Steffen Fritz; Norman Kerle; Bin Jiang; Mari Laakso; Hai-Ying Liu; Grega Milčinski; Matej Nikšič; Marco Painho; Andrea Pődör; Ana-Maria Olteanu-Raimond; Martin Rutzinger. 2016. "Crowdsourcing, Citizen Science or Volunteered Geographic Information? The Current State of Crowdsourced Geographic Information." ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 5, no. 5: 55.