This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.

Unclaimed
Steven T. Bellows
Parkinson’s Disease Center and Movement Disorders Clinic, Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX

Basic Info

Basic Info is private.

Honors and Awards

The user has no records in this section


Career Timeline

The user has no records in this section.


Short Biography

The user biography is not available.
Following
Followers
Co Authors
The list of users this user is following is empty.
Following: 0 users

Feed

Journal article
Published: 29 March 2021 in Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Patients with essential tremor were initially considered to have isolated tremor, but additional motor and non-motor features have been increasingly recognized. The term “essential tremor plus” was adopted by the Task Force on Tremor of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society to describe essential tremor patients with additional neurologic signs. To characterize essential tremor patients and their phenotypes in a movement disorders clinic population in the context of the new tremor classification. Demographic, clinical, historical, treatment, and diagnostic data were retrospectively collected on 300 patients diagnosed by movement disorder experts with essential tremor. Patients were classified as having essential tremor, essential tremor plus, or essential tremor-Parkinson’s disease combination, and features between these groups were compared. Of the 300 patients, 20.7% were classified as isolated essential tremor, 53.3% as essential tremor plus, and 26.0% as essential tremor-Parkinson’s disease. There was no significant difference in the duration of tremor symptoms. Essential tremor plus patients were more likely to have dystonia, tandem gait abnormalities, head tremor and greater tremor severity. Essential tremor-Parkinson’s disease patients were more likely to have RBD symptoms. There was no significant difference in cognitive impairment between essential tremor plus and essential tremor-Parkinson’s disease patients. Additional motor and non-motor features, including parkinsonism, are common in patients with essential tremor. Further studies are needed to clarify essential tremor phenotypes and to provide insights into possible subtypes. 300 patients with essential tremor from a movement disorders clinic were re-classified based on the Movement Disorder Society Consensus Statement on the Classification of Tremors. Additional motor and non-motor features, including parkinsonism, were common, and only 20.7% of patients remained classified as isolated essential tremor.

ACS Style

Steven T. Bellows; Joseph Jankovic. Phenotypic Features of Isolated Essential Tremor, Essential Tremor Plus, and Essential Tremor-Parkinson’s Disease in a Movement Disorders Clinic. Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements 2021, 11, 1 .

AMA Style

Steven T. Bellows, Joseph Jankovic. Phenotypic Features of Isolated Essential Tremor, Essential Tremor Plus, and Essential Tremor-Parkinson’s Disease in a Movement Disorders Clinic. Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements. 2021; 11 (1):1.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Steven T. Bellows; Joseph Jankovic. 2021. "Phenotypic Features of Isolated Essential Tremor, Essential Tremor Plus, and Essential Tremor-Parkinson’s Disease in a Movement Disorders Clinic." Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements 11, no. 1: 1.

Reply
Published: 23 January 2020 in Toxins
Reads 0
Downloads 0

We appreciate the commentary on our article by Foster and Beard, both employees of Ipsen

ACS Style

Steven Bellows; Joseph Jankovic. Reply to Comment on Re-Visiting Immunogenicity Associated with Botulinum Toxin Treatment. Toxins 2019, 11, 491. Toxins 2020, 12, 72 .

AMA Style

Steven Bellows, Joseph Jankovic. Reply to Comment on Re-Visiting Immunogenicity Associated with Botulinum Toxin Treatment. Toxins 2019, 11, 491. Toxins. 2020; 12 (2):72.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Steven Bellows; Joseph Jankovic. 2020. "Reply to Comment on Re-Visiting Immunogenicity Associated with Botulinum Toxin Treatment. Toxins 2019, 11, 491." Toxins 12, no. 2: 72.

Review
Published: 26 August 2019 in Toxins
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) has been used for the treatment of a variety of neurologic, medical and cosmetic conditions. Two serotypes, type A (BoNT-A) and type B (BoNT-B), are currently in clinical use. While considered safe and effective, their use has been rarely complicated by the development of antibodies that reduce or negate their therapeutic effect. The presence of antibodies has been attributed to shorter dosing intervals (and booster injections), higher doses per injection cycle, and higher amounts of antigenic protein. Other factors contributing to the immunogenicity of BoNT include properties of each serotype, such as formulation, manufacturing, and storage of the toxin. Some newer formulations with purified core neurotoxin devoid of accessory proteins may have lower overall immunogenicity. Several assays are available for the detection of antibodies, including both structural assays such as ELISA and mouse-based bioassays, but there is no consistent correlation between these antibodies and clinical response. Prevention and treatment of antibody-associated non-responsiveness is challenging and primarily involves the use of less immunogenic formulations of BoNT, waiting for the spontaneous disappearance of the neutralizing antibody, and switching to an immunologically alternate type of BoNT.

ACS Style

Steven Bellows; Joseph Jankovic. Immunogenicity Associated with Botulinum Toxin Treatment. Toxins 2019, 11, 491 .

AMA Style

Steven Bellows, Joseph Jankovic. Immunogenicity Associated with Botulinum Toxin Treatment. Toxins. 2019; 11 (9):491.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Steven Bellows; Joseph Jankovic. 2019. "Immunogenicity Associated with Botulinum Toxin Treatment." Toxins 11, no. 9: 491.