Antony Brown

Prof. Antony Brown

Natural Sciences, Tromsø University Museum, UiT - The Arctic University, Kvaløyvegen 30, 9013 Tromsø, Norway

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2018 in Earth-Science Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Antony BrownAntony Brown
Antony Brown
LLLaurent Lespez
Laurent Lespez
DSDavid A. Sear
David A. Sear
JMJean-Jacques Macaire
Jean-Jacques Macaire
PHPeter Houben
Peter Houben
BPBen Pears
Ben Pears

13 February 2021 in Quaternary
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ECEric Capo
Eric Capo
Charline Giguet-CovexCharline Giguet-Covex
Charline Giguet-Covex
ARAlexandra Rouillard
Alexandra Rouillard
KNKevin Nota
Kevin Nota
PHPeter Heintzman
Peter Heintzman
Laura ParducciLaura Parducci
Laura Parducci
The use of lake sedimentary DNA to track the long-term changes in both terrestrial and aquatic biota is a rapidly advancing field in paleoecological research. Although largely applied nowadays, knowledge gaps remain in this field and there is therefore still research to be conducted to ensure the reliability of the sedimentary DNA signal. Building on the most recent literature and seven original case studies, we synthesize the state-of-the-art analytical procedures for effective sampling, extraction, amplification, quantification and/or generation of DNA inventories from sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA) via high-throughput sequencing technologies. We provide recommendations based on current knowledge and best practises.

22 March 2016 in Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Antony BrownAntony Brown
Antony Brown
STStephen Tooth
Stephen Tooth
JBJoanna E. Bullard
Joanna E. Bullard
DTDavid S. G. Thomas
David S. G. Thomas
RCRichard Christopher Chiverrell
Richard Christopher Chiverrell
RARolf Aalto
Rolf Aalto
The Anthropocene is proposed as a new interval of geological time in which human influence on Earth and its geological record dominates over natural processes. A major challenge in demarcating the Anthropocene is that the balance between human‐influenced and natural processes varies over spatial and temporal scales owing to the inherent variability of both human activities (as associated with culture and modes of development) and natural drivers (e.g. tectonic activity and sea level variation). Against this backdrop, we consider how geomorphology might contribute towards the Anthropocene debate by focusing on human impact on aeolian, fluvial, cryospheric and coastal process domains, and how evidence of this impact is preserved in landforms and sedimentary records. We also consider the evidence for an explicitly anthropogenic geomorphology that includes artificial slopes and other human‐created landforms. This provides the basis for discussing the theoretical and practical contributions that geomorphology can make to defining an Anthropocene stratigraphy. It is clear that the relevance of the Anthropocene concept varies considerably amongst different branches of geomorphology, depending on the history of human actions in different process domains. For example, evidence of human dominance is more widespread in fluvial and coastal records than in aeolian and cryospheric records, so geomorphologically the Anthropocene would inevitably comprise a highly diachronous lower boundary. Even to identify this lower boundary, research would need to focus on the disambiguation of human effects on geomorphological and sedimentological signatures. This would require robust data, derived from a combination of modelling and new empirical work rather than an arbitrary ‘war of possible boundaries' associated with convenient, but disputed, ‘golden’ spikes. Rather than being drawn into stratigraphical debates, the primary concern of geomorphology should be with the investigation of processes and landform development, so providing the underpinning science for the study of this time of critical geological transition. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1 June 2010 in Global and Planetary Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
THThomas Hoffmann
Thomas Hoffmann
VTV.R. Thorndycraft
V.R. Thorndycraft
Antony BrownAntony Brown
Antony Brown
TCT.J. Coulthard
T.J. Coulthard
BDB. Damnati
B. Damnati
DWD.E. Walling
D.E. Walling

1 August 2017 in Quaternary Science Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BPB.T. Pennington
B.T. Pennington
FSFraser Sturt
Fraser Sturt
PWP. Wilson
P. Wilson
JRJ. Rowland
J. Rowland
Antony BrownAntony Brown
Antony Brown
The evolution of the Nile Delta, the largest delta system in the Mediterranean Sea, has both high palaeoenvironmental and archaeological significance. A dynamic model of the landscape evolution of this delta system is presented for the period c.8000–4500 cal BP. Analysis of sedimentary data and chronostratigraphic information contained within 1640 borehole records has allowed for a redefinition of the internal stratigraphy of the Holocene delta, and the construction of a four-dimensional landscape model for the delta's evolution through time. The mid-Holocene environmental evolution is characterised by a transition from an earlier set of spatially varied landscapes dominated by swampy marshland, to better-drained, more uniform floodplain environments. Archaeologically important Pleistocene inliers in the form of sandy hills protruding above the delta plain surface (known as “turtlebacks”), also became smaller as the delta plain continued to aggrade, while the shoreline and coastal zone prograded north. These changes were forced by a decrease in the rate of relative sea-level rise under high rates of sediment-supply. This dynamic environmental evolution needs to be integrated within any discussion of the contemporary developments in the social sphere, which culminated in the emergence of the Ancient Egyptian State c.5050 cal BP

11 November 2015 in The Holocene
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IAInger Alsos
Inger Alsos
PSPer Sjögren
Per Sjögren
MEMary E Edwards
Mary E Edwards
JLJon Y Landvik
Jon Y Landvik
LGLudovic Gielly
Ludovic Gielly
MPMikkel W Pedersen
Mikkel W Pedersen
Reconstructing past vegetation and species diversity from arctic lake sediments can be challenging because of low pollen and plant macrofossil concentrations. Information may be enhanced by metabarcoding of sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA). We developed a Holocene record from Lake Skartjørna, Svalbard, using sedaDNA, plant macrofossils and sediment properties, and compared it with published records. All but two genera of vascular plants identified as macrofossils in this or a previous study were identified with sedaDNA. Six additional vascular taxa were found, plus two algal and 12 bryophyte taxa, by sedaDNA analysis, which also detected more species per sample than macrofossil analysis. A shift from Salix polaris-dominated vegetation, with Koenigia islandica, Ranunculaceae and the relatively thermophilic species Arabis alpina and Betula, to Dryas octopetala-dominated vegetation ~6600–5500 cal. BP suggests a transition from moist conditions 1–2°C warmer than today to colder/drier conditions. This coincides with a decrease in runoff, inferred from core lithology, and an independent record of declining lacustrine productivity. This mid-Holocene change in terrestrial vegetation is broadly coincident with changes in records from marine sediments off the west coast of Svalbard. Over the Holocene sedaDNA records little floristic change, and it clearly shows species persisted near the lake during time intervals when they are not detected as macrofossils. The flora has shown resilience in the presence of a changing climate, and, if future warming is limited to 2°C or less, we might expect only minor floristic changes in this region. However, the Holocene record provides no analogues for greater warming.