Pil Joo Kim

Prof. Dr. Pil Joo Kim

Division of Applied Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, Korea

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2015 in Applied Soil Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJennifer P. Cuello
Jennifer P. Cuello
HHHyun Young Hwang
Hyun Young Hwang
JGJessie Gutierrez
Jessie Gutierrez
SKSang Yoon Kim
Sang Yoon Kim
PKPil Joo Kim
Pil Joo Kim

1 April 2007 in Chemosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NANagib Ahsan
Nagib Ahsan
DLDong-Gi Lee
Dong-Gi Lee
SLSang-Hoon Lee
Sang-Hoon Lee
KKKyu Young Kang
Kyu Young Kang
JLJeung Joo Lee
Jeung Joo Lee
BLByung-Hyun Lee
Byung-Hyun Lee

27 August 2008 in Proteomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NANagib Ahsan
Nagib Ahsan
DLDong‐Gi Lee
Dong‐Gi Lee
IAIftekhar Alam
Iftekhar Alam
PKPil Joo Kim
Pil Joo Kim
JLJeung Joo Lee
Jeung Joo Lee
L Byung-Hyun Lee
Byung-Hyun Lee

5 September 2017 in Frontiers in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SDSuvendu Das
Suvendu Das
SJSeung Tak Jeong
Seung Tak Jeong
SDSubhasis Das
Subhasis Das
PKPil Joo Kim
Pil Joo Kim
The livestock waste composts with minimum inorganic fertilizer as a soil amendment in low-input intensive farming are a feasible agricultural practice to improve soil fertility and productivity and to mitigate soil degradation. The key benefits of the practice rely on the activities of soil microorganisms. However, the role of different livestock composts (composted cattle manure vs. composted swine manure) on soil microbes, their activities and the overall impact on soil fertility and productivity in a flooded paddy remains elusive. This study compared the effectiveness of composted cattle manure (CCM) and composted swine manure (CSM) amendment on bacterial communities, activities, nutrient availability and crop yield in a flooded rice cropping system. We used deep 16S amplicon sequencing and soil enzyme activities to decipher bacterial communities and activities, respectively. Both CCM and CSM amendment significantly increased soil pH, nutrient availability (C, N, and P), microbial biomass, soil enzyme activities indicative for C and N cycles, aboveground plant biomass and grain yield. And the increase in above-mentioned parameters was more prominent in the CCM treatment compared to the CSM treatment. The CCM amendment increased species richness and stimulated copiotrophic microbial groups (Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria and Firmicutes) which are often involved in degradation of complex organic compounds. Moreover, some dominant species (e.g., Azospirillum zeae, Azospirillum halopraeferens, Azospirillum rugosum, Clostridium alkalicellulosi, Clostridium caenicola, Clostridium termitidis, Clostridium cellulolyticum, Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum, Pleomorphomonas oryzae, Variovorax boronicumulans, Pseudomonas xanthomarina, Pseudomonas stutzeri, and Bacillus niacini) which have a key role in plant growth promotion and/or lignocellulose degradation were enhanced under CCM treatment compared to CSM treatment. Multivariate analysis revealed that soil pH and available C and N were the major, while TOC, TN, and available P were the minor drivers of variation in bacterial communities. Together, it could be suggested that CCM amendment is better than CSM amendment to improve soil fertility and crop yield in a submerged rice cropping system.

1 December 2008 in Waste Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLChang Hoon Lee
Chang Hoon Lee
DLDo Kyoung Lee
Do Kyoung Lee
MAMuhammad aslam Ali
Muhammad aslam Ali
PKPil Joo Kim
Pil Joo Kim

1 August 2010 in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLChang Hoon Lee
Chang Hoon Lee
KPKi Do Park
Ki Do Park
KJKi Yuol Jung
Ki Yuol Jung
MAMuhammad aslam Ali
Muhammad aslam Ali
DLDokyoung Lee
Dokyoung Lee
PKPil Joo Kim
Pil Joo Kim