Wilson Ozuem

Prof. Wilson Ozuem

Institute of Business, Industry and Leadership, University of Cumbria, Lancaster LA1 3JD, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2023 in International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MNMuhammad Naeem
Muhammad Naeem
WOWilson Ozuem
Wilson Ozuem
KHKerry Howell
Kerry Howell
SRSilvia Ranfagni
Silvia Ranfagni
Thematic analysis is a highly popular technique among qualitative researchers for analyzing qualitative data, which usually comprises thick descriptive data. However, the application and use of thematic analysis has also involved complications due to confusion regarding the final outcome’s presentation as a conceptual model. This paper develops a systematic thematic analysis process for creating a conceptual model from qualitative research findings. It explores the adaptability of the proposed process across various research methodologies, including constructivist methodologies, positivist methodologies, grounded theory, and interpretive phenomenology, and justifies their application. The paper distinguishes between inductive and deductive coding approaches and emphasizes the merits of each. It suggests that the derived systematic thematic analysis model is valuable across multiple disciplines, particularly in grounded theory, ethnographic approaches, and narrative approaches, while also being adaptable to more descriptive, positivist-based methodologies. By providing a methodological roadmap, this study enhances the rigor and replicability of thematic analysis and offers a comprehensive strategy for theoretical conceptualization in qualitative research. The contribution of this paper is a systematic six-step thematic analysis process that leads to the development of a conceptual model; each step is described in detail and examples are given.

18 June 2021 in Psychology & Marketing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WOWilson Ozuem
Wilson Ozuem
SRSilvia Ranfagni
Silvia Ranfagni
MWMichelle Willis
Michelle Willis
SRSerena Rovai
Serena Rovai
KHKerry Howell
Kerry Howell
While the debate on online service failure and recovery strategies has been given considerable attention in the marketing and information systems literature, the evolving Covid‐19 pandemic has brought about new challenges both theoretically and empirically in the consumption landscape. To fully understand customers' responses to service failure during a crisis we asked 70 millennials from three European Countries—Italy, France, and the UK—to describe their responses to service failure during the Covid‐19 pandemic (30 completed a 4‐week diary and 40 completed a 4‐week qualitative survey). Drawing on phenomenological, constructivist, and hermeneutical approaches, and utilizing an actor–network theory perspective, the current study proposes a new framework for understanding customers' responses to online service failure and recovery strategies during the Covid‐19 pandemic. Conclusions highlight implications for theory, policy, and management practice through extending comprehensions of service failure recovery processes by examining how marketing policies generate different social impacts during a crisis situation which facilitate the achievement of customer satisfaction and positive outcomes.

9 January 2020 in Psychology & Marketing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YAYllka Azemi
Yllka Azemi
WOWilson Ozuem
Wilson Ozuem
KHKerry E. Howell
Kerry E. Howell

27 October 2021 in Information Technology & People
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MNMuhammad Naeem
Muhammad Naeem
WOWilson Ozuem
Wilson Ozuem
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to understand how socially shared misinformation and rumors can enhance the motivation to protect personal interests and enhance social practices of panic buying.Design/methodology/approach: The study employed a number of qualitative data collection methods for the purpose of triangulation, as it can offer thick interpretation and can help to develop a context specific research framework.Findings: The shared misinformation and rumors on social media developed into psychological, physical and social threats; therefore, people started panic buying to avoid these negative consequences. People believed that there were differences between the information shared by politicians and government officials and reality, such as “everything is under control,” whereas social media showed people standing in long queues and struggling to buy the necessities of life. The shared misinformation and rumors on social media became viral and received social validation, which created panic buying in many countries.Research limitations/implications: It is the responsibility of government, politicians, leaders, media and the public to control misinformation and rumors, as many people were unable to buy groceries due either to socio-economic status or their decisions of late buying, which increased depression among people.Originality/value: The study merged the theory of rumor (TORT) transmission and protection motivation theory (PMT) to understand how misinformation and rumors shared through social media increased global uncertainty and the desire to panic buy across the world.

5 March 2021 in Psychology & Marketing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WOWilson Ozuem
Wilson Ozuem
MWMichelle Willis
Michelle Willis
KHKerry Howell
Kerry Howell
GLGeoff Lancaster
Geoff Lancaster
RNRaye Ng
Raye Ng
Online communities have evolved to allow larger numbers of individuals to interact with other users to form a collective virtual environment influenced by members within the community. Existing studies on online brand communities (OBCs) tied millennials’ participation and interactions to a unidimensional view. Specifically, OBCs scholars generally aggregate individual millennials’ participation and commitment, ignoring the variance among the demographic cohort. Our exploration challenges not only the existing ensemble interpretation within studies of OBC but also the characterisation of millennials’ burgeoning participation in OBCs. Unlike other competing epistemologies, the authors developed a conceptual framework that links a holistic set of OBCs’ characteristics (brand sentiment, identification with source, affirmative experience, conspicuous effect) to consumers’ perceptions in the fashion sector. Drawing on social influence theory along with a constructivist perspective, we conducted fine‐grained in‐depth interviews to explore millennials’ participation in online communities and brand perceptions in the fashion industry. The main findings reveal four categories of customer engagement in OBCs (bias situators, sugar‐coaters, rationalisers, judgmentalists). These key categories are explored to create a framework for future research in this area, and further contribute to the field of online brand engagement, particularly in the fashion industry.

2 March 2021 in Psychology & Marketing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WOWilson Ozuem
Wilson Ozuem
MWMichelle Willis
Michelle Willis
KHKerry Howell
Kerry Howell
GHGuida Helal
Guida Helal
SRSilvia Ranfagni
Silvia Ranfagni
GLGeoff Lancaster
Geoff Lancaster