Ralf Wuthenow

Dr. Ralf Wuthenow

Institut für Maschinelle Anlagentechnik und Betriebsfestigkeit, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Lower Saxony, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 July 2021 in Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RWRalf Wuthenow
Ralf Wuthenow
MWMichael Wächter
Michael Wächter
LMLukas Masendorf
Lukas Masendorf
AEAlfons Esderts
Alfons Esderts
The prediction of fatigue lives of metallic components using the notch strain approach is based on local stresses and strains. These can be determined either by analytical approximation formulas such as Neuber's rule based on linear elastic stresses or by finite element analysis with elastic–plastic material behavior. The latter has the disadvantage of longer computation times.This paper discusses a draft for application of artificial neural networks as an alternative approach for estimating uniaxial and multiaxial proportional elastic–plastic stresses and strains in notch roots based on linear elastic stresses. These networks are trained on results from elastic–plastic finite element analyses on flat bars notched on both sides and circumferentially notched shafts to predict local stresses. The resulting accuracy is compared to the analytical approximation formulas.The research findings confirm that neural networks can estimate local stresses with similar scatter and better mean value compared to analytical formulas.

8 March 2022 in Applied Mechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MWMichael Wächter
Michael Wächter
ALAlexander Linn
Alexander Linn
RWRalf Wuthenow
Ralf Wuthenow
AEAlfons Esderts
Alfons Esderts
CGChristian Gaier
Christian Gaier
MVMichael Vormwald
Michael Vormwald
The approaches used to calculate the fatigue life of components must inevitably consider multiaxial stresses. Compared to proportional loading, the calculation of nonproportional loading is particularly challenging, especially since different materials exhibit the effects of nonproportional hardening and shifts in fatigue life. In this paper, the critical plane approach of scaled normal stresses, first proposed by Gaier and Dannbauer and later published in a modified version by Riess et al., is investigated in detail. It is shown that, on the one hand, compatibilities exist or can be established with known proportional strength criteria that can account for the varying ductility of different materials. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the scaled normal stress approach can be formulated in such a way that different strength criteria can be used therein. As an example, the generally formulated approach for scaled normal stresses is applied to test results from ductile cast iron material EN-GJS-500-14. Different correction factors accounting for nonproportional loading are investigated. Through appropriate parameterization of one of the studied corrections, proportional and nonproportional test results were observed to fall within one common scatter band.

3 November 2021 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RWRalf Wuthenow
Ralf Wuthenow
LMLukas Masendorf
Lukas Masendorf
MWMichael Wächter
Michael Wächter
AEAlfons Esderts
Alfons Esderts
An estimation of the elastic-plastic stress state using elasticity-theoretical input data is an essential part of the service life estimation with the local strain approach in general and a German guideline based on it, in particular. This guideline uses two different notch root approximations (an extended version of Neuber’s rule and an approach according to Seeger and Beste) for this estimation. Both require the implementation of Newton’s method to be iteratively solved. However, many options are left open to the user concerning implementation in program code. This paper discusses ways in which notch root approximation methods can be implemented efficiently for use in software systems and elaborates an application recommendation. The following aspects and their influence on the computational accuracy and performance of Newton’s method are considered in detail: influence of the formulation of the root finding problem, determination of the derivative required for Newton’s method and influence of the termination criterion. The investigation shows that the advice given in the abovementioned guideline indeed leads to a conservative implementation. By carefully considering the investigated aspects, however, the computational performance can be increased by approximately a factor of 2–3 without influencing the accuracy of the service life estimation.

8 December 2021 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLukas Masendorf
Lukas Masendorf
RWRalf Wuthenow
Ralf Wuthenow
MWMichael Wächter
Michael Wächter
AEAlfons Esderts
Alfons Esderts
For the service life estimation of metallic components under cyclic loading according to strain-based approaches, a simulation of the elastic-plastic stress–strain path at the point of interest is necessary. An efficient method for determining this stress–strain path is the use of the load–notch-strain curve, as this is also implemented within the FKM guideline nonlinear. The load–notch-strain curve describes the relationship between the load on the component and the local elastic-plastic strain. On the one hand, this can be estimated from loads or theoretical elastic stresses by using notch root approximations. On the other hand, this can be determined in a finite element analysis based on the elastic-plastic material behaviour. This contribution describes how this latter option is carried out in general and how it can be optimised in such a way that the FEA requires significantly less calculation time. To show the benefit of this optimisation, a comparative calculation on an exemplary geometry is carried out.

2 June 2022
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
RWRalf Wuthenow
Ralf Wuthenow
MWMichael Wächter
Michael Wächter
LML. Masendorf
L. Masendorf
AEA. Esderts
A. Esderts