Simon Judd

Prof. Dr. Simon Judd

Cranfield Water Science Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2002 in Journal of Environmental Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ICIn-Soung Chang
In-Soung Chang
Pierre LeClechPierre LeClech
Pierre LeClech
JBJefferson Raja Bose
Jefferson Raja Bose
Simon JuddSimon Judd
Simon Judd
Membrane bioreactors (MBRs), in which membranes are applied to biological wastewater treatment for biomass separation, provide many advantages over conventional treatment. However, membrane fouling in MBRs restricts their widespread application because it reduces productivity and increases maintenance and operating costs. Recently much research and development has taken place to investigate, model, and control membrane fouling processes. However, unified and well-structured theories on membrane fouling are not currently available because of the complexity of the biomass matrix, which is highly heterogeneous and includes living microorganisms. Membrane fouling in MBR systems can be reversible (i.e., removable by physical washing) or irreversible (removable by chemical cleaning only), and can take place on the membrane surface or into the membrane pores. Although establishing a general model to describe membrane fouling in such a process is made extremely difficult by the inherent heterogeneity of the system, the nature and extent of fouling in MBRs is strongly influenced by three factors: biomass characteristics, operating conditions, and membrane characteristics. Fouling control techniques which have been investigated include low-flux operation, high-shear slug flow aeration in submerged configuration, periodical air or permeate backflushing, intermittent suction operation or addition of powdered activated carbon (PAC). Of these, only PAC addition is currently not used in existing large-scale installations.

1 February 2008 in Trends in Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Simon JuddSimon Judd
Simon Judd

1 October 1994 in Environmental Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VCVenceslau M. Correia
Venceslau M. Correia
TSTom Stephenson
Tom Stephenson
Simon JuddSimon Judd
Simon Judd
The characteristics of wastewater from textile processing operations are comprehensively reviewed. The categorisation of wastewaters proceeds through a consideration of the nature of the various industrial processes employed by the industry and the chemicals associated with these operations. Chemical pollutants arise both from the raw material itself and a broad range of additives used to produce the finished product. The industrial categories considered include sizing and desizing, weaving, scouring, bleaching, mercerizing, carbonizing, fulling, dyeing and finishing. Pollutants of concern range from non‐biodegradable highly‐coloured organic dyes to pesticides from special finishes such as insect‐proofing. It is evident that the textile wastewater chemical composition is subject to considerable change due to both the diversity in the textile processes employed and the range of chemicals employed within each industrial category.

1 December 2003 in Journal of Membrane Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Pierre LeClechPierre LeClech
Pierre LeClech
JBJefferson Raja Bose
Jefferson Raja Bose
ICIn Soung Chang
In Soung Chang
Simon JuddSimon Judd
Simon Judd

1 May 1999 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DTD.N. Thomas
D.N. Thomas
Simon JuddSimon Judd
Simon Judd
NFN. Fawcett
N. Fawcett

18 February 2010 in Separation and Purification Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NPNicandro Porcelli
Nicandro Porcelli
Simon JuddSimon Judd
Simon Judd