Esra Capanoglu

Dr. Esra Capanoglu

Department of Food Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, Istanbul 34469, Turkey
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2013 in Food Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TOTugba Ozdal
Tugba Ozdal
Esra CapanogluEsra Capanoglu
Esra Capanoglu
FAFiliz Altay
Filiz Altay

27 January 2016 in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Resat ApakResat Apak
Resat Apak
Mustafa ÖzyürekMustafa Özyürek
Mustafa Özyürek
KGKubilay Güçlü
Kubilay Güçlü
Esra CapanogluEsra Capanoglu
Esra Capanoglu
Because there is no widely adopted “total antioxidant parameter” as a nutritional index for labeling food and biological fluids, it is desirable to establish and standardize methods that can measure the total antioxidant capacity (TAC) level directly from plant-based food extracts and biological fluids. In this review, we (i) present and classify the widely used analytical approaches (e.g., in vitro and in vivo, enzymatic and nonenzymatic, electron transfer (ET)- and hydrogen atom transfer (HAT)-based, direct and indirect assays) for evaluating antioxidant capacity/activity; (ii) discuss total antioxidant capacity/activity assays in terms of chemical kinetics and thermodynamics, reaction mechanisms, and analytical performance characteristics, together with advantages and drawbacks; and (iii) critically evaluate ET-based methods for analytical, food chemical, biomedical/clinical, and environmental scientific communities so that they can effectively use these assays in the correct places to meet their needs.

16 September 2020 in Food Frontiers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSenem Kamiloglu
Senem Kamiloglu
GSGulce SARI
Gulce SARI
TOTugba Ozdal
Tugba Ozdal
Esra CapanogluEsra Capanoglu
Esra Capanoglu
Recently, the interest in the application of cell viability assays has been increasing in various fields. Cell viability assays may be broadly classified as (a) dye exclusion assays, (b) colorimetric assays, (c) fluorometric assays, (d) luminometric assays, and (e) flow cytometric assays. Dye exclusion assays include trypan blue, eosin, congo red, and erythrosine B stain assays, whereas 3‐[4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl]‐2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT), 3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐5‐(3‐carboxymethoxyphenyl)‐2‐(4‐sulfophenyl)‐2H‐tetrazolium (MTS), 2,3‐bis‐(2‐methoxy‐4‐nitro‐5‐sulfophenyl)‐2H‐tetrazolium‐5‐carboxanilide (XTT), 2‐(4‐iodophenyl)‐3‐(4‐nitrophenyl)‐5‐(2,4‐disulfophenyl)‐2H tetrazolium, monosodium salt (WST‐1), 2‐(2‐methoxy‐4‐nitrophenyl)‐3‐(4‐nitrophenyl)‐5‐(2,4‐disulfophenyl)‐2H‐tetrazolium, monosodium salt (WST‐8), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), sulforhodamine B (SRB), neutral red uptake (NRU), and crystal violet stain (CVS) assays are among the colorimetric assays. Similarly, resazurin and 5‐carboxyfluorescein diacetate acetoxymethyl ester (5‐CFDA‐AM) assays are based on fluorometric measurements, whereas luminometric assays comprise adenosine triphosphate and real‐time viability assays. Major flow cytometric assays include membrane asymmetry, membrane permeability, and mitochondria assays. In this guideline, the mechanisms and the practice of assessment of the most common cell viability assays applied in research labs are discussed in detail. An ideal cell viability assay should be safe, rapid, reliable, efficient, and time‐ and cost‐effective, and should not interfere with the test compound. Overall, it can be concluded that more than one cell viability assay should be applied in order to obtain reliable results.

6 February 2016 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TOTugba Ozdal
Tugba Ozdal
DSDavid Sela
David Sela
Jianbo XiaoJianbo Xiao
Jianbo Xiao
DBDilek Boyacioglu
Dilek Boyacioglu
Fang ChenFang Chen
Fang Chen
Esra CapanogluEsra Capanoglu
Esra Capanoglu
As of late, polyphenols have increasingly interested the scientific community due to their proposed health benefits. Much of this attention has focused on their bioavailability. Polyphenol–gut microbiota interactions should be considered to understand their biological functions. The dichotomy between the biotransformation of polyphenols into their metabolites by gut microbiota and the modulation of gut microbiota composition by polyphenols contributes to positive health outcomes. Although there are many studies on the in vivo bioavailability of polyphenols, the mutual relationship between polyphenols and gut microbiota is not fully understood. This review focuses on the biotransformation of polyphenols by gut microbiota, modulation of gut microbiota by polyphenols, and the effects of these two-way mutual interactions on polyphenol bioavailability, and ultimately, human health.

10 June 2022 in ACS Omega
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EPElif Piskin
Elif Piskin
DCDanila Cianciosi
Danila Cianciosi
SGSukru Gulec
Sukru Gulec
Merve TomasMerve Tomas
Merve Tomas
Esra CapanogluEsra Capanoglu
Esra Capanoglu
Iron is an essential element for human life since it participates in many functions in the human body, including oxygen transport, immunity, cell division and differentiation, and energy metabolism. Iron homeostasis is mainly controlled by intestinal absorption because iron does not have active excretory mechanisms for humans. Thus, efficient intestinal iron bioavailability is essential to reduce the risk of iron deficiency anemia. There are two forms of iron, heme and nonheme, found in foods. The average daily dietary iron intake is 10 to 15 mg in humans since only 1 to 2 mg is absorbed through the intestinal system. Nutrient-nutrient interactions may play a role in dietary intestinal iron absorption. Dietary inhibitors such as calcium, phytates, polyphenols and enhancers such as ascorbic acid and proteins mainly influence iron bioavailability. Numerous studies have been carried out for years to enhance iron bioavailability and combat iron deficiency. In addition to traditional methods, innovative techniques are being developed day by day to enhance iron bioavailability. This review will provide information about iron bioavailability, factors affecting absorption, iron deficiency, and recent studies on improving iron bioavailability.

1 February 2022 in Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SDSema Demirci-Çekiç
Sema Demirci-Çekiç
GÖGülay Özkan
Gülay Özkan
AAAslı Neslihan Avan
Aslı Neslihan Avan
SUSeda Uzunboy
Seda Uzunboy
Esra CapanogluEsra Capanoglu
Esra Capanoglu
Resat ApakResat Apak
Resat Apak