Jonathan M Bunker

Prof. Jonathan M Bunker

Civil and Environmental Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
FGFahimeh (Fay) Golbabaei
Fahimeh (Fay) Golbabaei
Tan YigitcanlarTan Yigitcanlar
Tan Yigitcanlar
Alexander PazAlexander Paz
Alexander Paz
Jonathan M BunkerJonathan M Bunker
Jonathan M Bunker
Fully autonomous vehicles (AV) would potentially be one of the most disruptive technologies of our time. The extent of the prospective benefits of AVs is strongly linked to how widely they will be accepted and adopted. Monitoring and tracking of individuals’ reactions and intentions to use AVs are critical. The current study aims to explore and classify individual predictors (i.e., influential factors or determinants) of public acceptance of, and intention to use AVs, by conducting a systematic literature review and developing a conceptual framework to map out the individual influential factors that shape public attitudes towards AVs, which influence user acceptance and adoption preferences. This framework contains the key factors identified in the systematic review—i.e., demographic, psychological, and mobility behavior characteristics. The findings of the review disclose that public perceptions and adoption intentions vary significantly among different socio-demographic cohorts. Commuters value different aspects concerning AVs, which shape their intentions on acceptance and adoption. Thus, direct experience with AVs along with education and communication would be helpful to change people’s attitudes towards AVs in a positive way. The study informs urban and transport policymakers, managers, and planners, and helps in planning for a healthy AV adoption process with minimal societal disruption.


20 October 2010 in Transport Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YLYulin Liu
Yulin Liu
Jonathan M BunkerJonathan M Bunker
Jonathan M Bunker
LFLuis Ferreira
Luis Ferreira
This paper reviews the main studies on transit users’ route choice in the context of transit assignment. The studies are categorized into three groups: static transit assignment, within‐day dynamic transit assignment, and emerging approaches. The motivations and behavioural assumptions of these approaches are re‐examined. The first group includes shortest‐path heuristics in all‐or‐nothing assignment, random utility maximization route‐choice models in stochastic assignment, and user equilibrium based assignment. The second group covers within‐day dynamics in transit users’ route choice, transit network formulations, and dynamic transit assignment. The third group introduces the emerging studies on behavioural complexities, day‐to‐day dynamics, and real‐time dynamics in transit users’ route choice. Future research directions are also discussed.

1 December 2010 in Journal of Transportation Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SJSumeet Jaiswal
Sumeet Jaiswal
Jonathan M BunkerJonathan M Bunker
Jonathan M Bunker
LFLuis Ferreira
Luis Ferreira
The common approach to estimate bus dwell time at a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) station platform is to apply the traditional dwell-time methodology derived for suburban bus stops. Current dwell-time models are sensitive toward bus type and fare collection policy along with the number of boarding and alighting passengers. However, they fall short in accounting for the effects of passengers walking on a relatively longer BRT station platform. Analysis presented in this paper shows that the average walking time of a passenger at a BRT platform is 10 times more than that of a bus stop. The requirement of walking to the bus entry door at the BRT station platform may lead to the bus experiencing a higher dwell time. This paper presents a theory for a BRT network that explains the loss of station capacity during peak period operation. It also highlights shortcomings of present available bus dwell-time models suggested for the analysis of BRT operation.

23 November 2009
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
MBMargot Brereton
Margot Brereton
PRPaul Roe
Paul Roe
MFMarcus Foth
Marcus Foth
Jonathan M BunkerJonathan M Bunker
Jonathan M Bunker
Laurie BuysLaurie Buys
Laurie Buys
Growing participation is a key challenge for the viability of sustainability initiatives, many of which require enactment at a local community level in order to be effective. This paper undertakes a review of technology assisted carpooling in order to understand the challenge of designing participation and consider how mobile social software and interface design can be brought to bear. It was found that while persuasive technology and social networking approaches have roles to play, critical factors in the design of carpooling are convenience, ease of use and fit with contingent circumstances, all of which\ud require a use-centred approach to designing a technological system and building participation. Moreover, the reach of technology platform-based global approaches may be limited if they do not cater to local needs. An approach that focuses on iteratively designing technology to support and grow mobile social ridesharing networks in particular locales is proposed. The paper contributes an understanding of HCI approaches in the context of other designing participation approaches

1 June 2016 in Journal of Transport Geography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKSyeed Anta Kashfi
Syeed Anta Kashfi
Jonathan M BunkerJonathan M Bunker
Jonathan M Bunker
Tan YigitcanlarTan Yigitcanlar
Tan Yigitcanlar