LUCAS NOGUEIRA

Dr. LUCAS NOGUEIRA

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2009 in Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RTR. Houston Thompson
R. Houston Thompson
JKJordan M. Kurta
Jordan M. Kurta
MKMatthew Kaag
Matthew Kaag
STSatish K. Tickoo
Satish K. Tickoo
SKShilajit Kundu
Shilajit Kundu
PRPaul Russo
Paul Russo
We evaluated our experience with renal cortical tumors to determine whether tumor size is associated with malignant histology and/or nuclear grade. We identified 2,675 patients treated surgically at our institution for renal cell carcinoma or a benign tumor between 1989 and 2007. Histological subtype and tumor size were obtained from our kidney cancer database and logistic regression analysis was performed. Of the 2,675 tumors 311 (12%) were benign and 2,364 (88%) were renal cell carcinoma. The OR for the association of malignancy with tumor size was 1.16 (95% CI 1.11-1.22, p <0.001), indicating that each 1 cm increase in tumor size was associated with a 16% increase in the odds of malignancy. The incidence of benign tumors decreased from 38% for tumors less than 1 cm to 7% for tumors 7 cm or greater. In patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma each 1 cm increase in tumor size increased the odds of high grade disease (Fuhrman grade 3-4) compared with low grade disease (Fuhrman grade 1-2) by 25% (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.21-1.30, p <0.001). In this subset the incidence of high grade lesions increased from 0% for tumors less than 1 cm to 59% for tumors greater than 7 cm. Our results confirm previous observations suggesting that the risks of malignancy and high grade tumors increase with tumor size. Patients with small renal masses are at low risk for harboring a high grade clear cell malignancy, which may be useful during initial consultation.

1 March 2010 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FRFarhang Rabbani
Farhang Rabbani
LYLuis Herran Yunis
Luis Herran Yunis
RPRodrigo Pinochet
Rodrigo Pinochet
LNLUCAS NOGUEIRA
LUCAS NOGUEIRA
KVKinjal C. Vora
Kinjal C. Vora
KTKarim Touijer
Karim Touijer

1 July 2012 in The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SZStênio C. Zequi
Stênio C. Zequi
GGGustavo Cardoso Guimarães
Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães
FFFrancisco Paulo da Fonseca
Francisco Paulo da Fonseca
UFUbirajara Ferreira
Ubirajara Ferreira
WMWagner Eduardo de Matheus
Wagner Eduardo de Matheus
ALAdemar Lopes
Ademar Lopes

1 October 2009 in International braz j urol
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LNLUCAS NOGUEIRA
LUCAS NOGUEIRA
RCRenato Corradi
Renato Corradi
JEJames A. Eastham
James A. Eastham
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been used for prostate cancer detection since 1994. PSA testing has revolutionized our ability to diagnose, treat, and follow-up patients. In the last two decades, PSA screening has led to a substantial increase in the incidence of prostate cancer (PC). This increased detection caused the incidence of advanced-stage disease to decrease at a dramatic rate, and most newly diagnosed PC today are localized tumors with a high probability of cure. PSA screening is associated with a 75% reduction in the proportion of men who now present with metastatic disease and a 32.5% reduction in the age-adjusted prostate cancer mortality rate through 2003. Although PSA is not a perfect marker, PSA testing has limited specificity for prostate cancer detection, and its appropriate clinical application remains a topic of debate. Due to its widespread use and increased over-detection, the result has been the occurrence of over-treatment of indolent cancers. Accordingly, several variations as regards PSA measurement have emerged as useful adjuncts for prostate cancer screening. These procedures take into consideration additional factors, such as the proportion of different PSA isoforms (free PSA, complexed PSA, pro-PSA and B PSA), the prostate volume (PSA density), and the rate of change in PSA levels over time (PSA velocity or PSA doubling time). The history and evidence underlying each of these parameters are reviewed in the following article.

1 May 2010 in Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DYDavid S. Yee
David S. Yee
DKDarren J. Katz
Darren J. Katz
GGGuilherme Godoy
Guilherme Godoy
LNLUCAS NOGUEIRA
LUCAS NOGUEIRA
KCKian Tai Chong
Kian Tai Chong
JCJonathan Coleman
Jonathan Coleman

1 February 2010 in Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LNLUCAS NOGUEIRA
LUCAS NOGUEIRA
LWLiang Wang
Liang Wang
SFSamson W. Fine
Samson W. Fine
RPRodrigo Pinochet
Rodrigo Pinochet
JKJordan M. Kurta
Jordan M. Kurta
JCJonathan Coleman
Jonathan Coleman