Parampreet Singh

Prof. Dr. Parampreet Singh

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 September 2011 in Classical and Quantum Gravity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAbhay Ashtekar
Abhay Ashtekar
Parampreet SinghParampreet Singh
Parampreet Singh

2 October 2006 in Physical Review D
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAAbhay Ashtekar
Abhay Ashtekar
TPTomasz Pawlowski
Tomasz Pawlowski
Parampreet SinghParampreet Singh
Parampreet Singh
An improved Hamiltonian constraint operator is introduced in loop quantum cosmology. Quantum dynamics of the spatially flat, isotropic model with a massless scalar field is then studied in detail using analytical and numerical methods. The scalar field continues to serve as “emergent time”, the big bang is again replaced by a quantum bounce, and quantum evolution remains deterministic across the deep Planck regime. However, while with the Hamiltonian constraint used so far in loop quantum cosmology the quantum bounce can occur even at low matter densities, with the new Hamiltonian constraint it occurs only at a Planck-scale density. Thus, the new quantum dynamics retains the attractive features of current evolutions in loop quantum cosmology but, at the same time, cures their main weakness.

12 April 2006 in Physical Review Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAAbhay Ashtekar
Abhay Ashtekar
TPTomasz Pawlowski
Tomasz Pawlowski
Parampreet SinghParampreet Singh
Parampreet Singh
Some long-standing issues concerning the quantum nature of the big bang are resolved in the context of homogeneous isotropic models with a scalar field. Specifically, the known results on the resolution of the big-bang singularity in loop quantum cosmology are significantly extended as follows: (i) the scalar field is shown to serve as an internal clock, thereby providing a detailed realization of the “emergent time” idea; (ii) the physical Hilbert space, Dirac observables, and semiclassical states are constructed rigorously; (iii) the Hamiltonian constraint is solved numerically to show that the big bang is replaced by a big bounce. Thanks to the nonperturbative, background independent methods, unlike in other approaches the quantum evolution is deterministic across the deep Planck regime.

29 June 2006 in Physical Review D
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAAbhay Ashtekar
Abhay Ashtekar
TPTomasz Pawlowski
Tomasz Pawlowski
Parampreet SinghParampreet Singh
Parampreet Singh
Analytical and numerical methods are developed to analyze the quantum nature of the big bang in the setting of loop quantum cosmology. They enable one to explore the effects of quantum geometry both on the gravitational and matter sectors and significantly extend the known results on the resolution of the big bang singularity. Specifically, the following results are established for the homogeneous isotropic model with a massless scalar field: (i) the scalar field is shown to serve as an internal clock, thereby providing a detailed realization of the “emergent time” idea; (ii) the physical Hilbert space, Dirac observables, and semiclassical states are constructed rigorously; (iii) the Hamiltonian constraint is solved numerically to show that the big bang is replaced by a big bounce. Thanks to the nonperturbative, background independent methods, unlike in other approaches the quantum evolution is deterministic across the deep Planck regime. Our constructions also provide a conceptual framework and technical tools which can be used in more general models. In this sense, they provide foundations for analyzing physical issues associated with the Planck regime of loop quantum cosmology as a whole.

29 January 2008 in Physical Review D
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAAbhay Ashtekar
Abhay Ashtekar
Alejandro CorichiAlejandro Corichi
Alejandro Corichi
Parampreet SinghParampreet Singh
Parampreet Singh
A small simplification based on well-motivated approximations is shown to make loop quantum cosmology of the k=0 Friedman-Robertson-Walker model (with a massless scalar field) exactly soluble. Analytical methods are then used i) to show that the quantum bounce is generic; ii) to establish that the matter density has an absolute upper bound which, furthermore, equals the critical density that first emerged in numerical simulations and effective equations; iii) to bring out the precise sense in which the Wheeler-DeWitt theory approximates loop quantum cosmology and the sense in which this approximation fails; and iv) to show that discreteness underlying loop quantum cosmology is fundamental. Finally, the model is compared to analogous discussions in the literature and it is pointed out that some of their expectations do not survive a more careful examination. An effort has been made to make the underlying structure transparent also to those who are not familiar with details of loop quantum gravity.

26 January 2007 in Physical Review D
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAAbhay Ashtekar
Abhay Ashtekar
TPTomasz Pawlowski
Tomasz Pawlowski
Parampreet SinghParampreet Singh
Parampreet Singh
KVKevin Vandersloot
Kevin Vandersloot
The closed, k=1, FRW model coupled to a massless scalar field is investigated in the framework of loop quantum cosmology using analytical and numerical methods. As in the k=0 case, the scalar field can be again used as emergent time to construct the physical Hilbert space and introduce Dirac observables. The resulting framework is then used to address a major challenge of quantum cosmology: resolving the big-bang singularity while retaining agreement with general relativity at large scales. It is shown that the framework fulfills this task. In particular, for states which are semiclassical at some late time, the big bang is replaced by a quantum bounce and a recollapse occurs at the value of the scale factor predicted by classical general relativity. Thus, the “difficulties” pointed out by Green and Unruh in the k=1 case do not arise in a more systematic treatment. As in k=0 models, quantum dynamics is deterministic across the deep Planck regime. However, because it also retains the classical recollapse, in contrast to the k=0 case one is now led to a cyclic model. Finally, we clarify some issues raised by Laguna’s recent work addressed to computational physicists.