Federica Di Nicolantionio

Prof. Federica Di Nicolantionio

Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Strada Provinciale, 10060 Candiolo, Turin, Italy; Candiolo Cancer Institute – FPO, IRCCS, Torino, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 January 2012 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APAnirudh Prahallad
Anirudh Prahallad
CSChong Sun
Chong Sun
SHSidong Huang
Sidong Huang
Federica Di NicolantionioFederica Di Nicolantionio
Federica Di Nicolantionio
RSRamon Salazar
Ramon Salazar
RBRené Bernards
René Bernards

13 June 2012 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SMSandra Misale
Sandra Misale
RYRona Yaeger
Rona Yaeger
SHSebastijan Hobor
Sebastijan Hobor
ESElisa Scala
Elisa Scala
MJManickam Janakiraman
Manickam Janakiraman
ABAlberto Bardelli
Alberto Bardelli

9 July 2013 in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ECEmily Crowley
Emily Crowley
Federica Di NicolantionioFederica Di Nicolantionio
Federica Di Nicolantionio
FLFotios Loupakis
Fotios Loupakis
ABAlberto Bardelli
Alberto Bardelli

10 December 2008 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Federica Di NicolantionioFederica Di Nicolantionio
Federica Di Nicolantionio
MMMiriam Martini
Miriam Martini
FMFrancesca Molinari
Francesca Molinari
Andrea Sartore-BianchiAndrea Sartore-Bianchi
Andrea Sartore-Bianchi
SASabrina Arena
Sabrina Arena
ABAlberto Bardelli
Alberto Bardelli
Purpose: Cetuximab or panitumumab are effective in 10% to 20% unselected metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. KRAS mutations account for approximately 30% to 40% patients who are not responsive. The serine-threonine kinase BRAF is the principal effector of KRAS. We hypothesized that, in KRAS wild-type patients, BRAF mutations could have a predictive/prognostic value. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed objective tumor responses, time to progression, overall survival (OS), and the mutational status of KRAS and BRAF in 113 tumors from cetuximab- or panitumumab-treated metastatic CRC patients. The effect of the BRAF V600E mutation on cetuximab or panitumumab response was also assessed using cellular models of CRC. Results: KRAS mutations were present in 30% of the patients and were associated with resistance to cetuximab or panitumumab (P = .011). The BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 11 of 79 patients who had wild-type KRAS. None of the BRAF-mutated patients responded to treatment, whereas none of the responders carried BRAF mutations (P = .029). BRAF-mutated patients had significantly shorter progression-free survival (P = .011) and OS (P < .0001) than wild-type patients. In CRC cells, the introduction of BRAF V600E allele impaired the therapeutic effect of cetuximab or panitumumab. Treatment with the BRAF inhibitor sorafenib restored sensitivity to panitumumab or cetuximab of CRC cells carrying the V600E allele. Conclusion: BRAF wild-type is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab and could be used to select patients who are eligible for the treatment. Double-hit therapies aimed at simultaneous inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor and BRAF warrant exploration in CRC patients carrying the V600E oncogenic mutation.

26 March 2014 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CSChong Sun
Chong Sun
LWLiqin Wang
Liqin Wang
SHSidong Huang
Sidong Huang
GHGuus J. J. E. Heynen
Guus J. J. E. Heynen
APAnirudh Prahallad
Anirudh Prahallad
RBRené Bernards
René Bernards

1 November 2011 in Cancer Discovery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAndrea Bertotti
Andrea Bertotti
GMGiorgia Migliardi
Giorgia Migliardi
FGFrancesco Galimi
Francesco Galimi
FSFrancesco Sassi
Francesco Sassi
DTDavide Torti
Davide Torti
LTLivio Trusolino
Livio Trusolino
Only a fraction of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receive clinical benefit from therapy with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies, which calls for the identification of novel biomarkers for better personalized medicine. We produced large xenograft cohorts from 85 patient-derived, genetically characterized metastatic colorectal cancer samples (“xenopatients”) to discover novel determinants of therapeutic response and new oncoprotein targets. Serially passaged tumors retained the morphologic and genomic features of their original counterparts. A validation trial confirmed the robustness of this approach: xenopatients responded to the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab with rates and extents analogous to those observed in the clinic and could be prospectively stratified as responders or nonresponders on the basis of several predictive biomarkers. Genotype–response correlations indicated HER2 amplification specifically in a subset of cetuximab-resistant, KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type cases. Importantly, HER2 amplification was also enriched in clinically nonresponsive KRAS wild-type patients. A proof-of-concept, multiarm study in HER2-amplified xenopatients revealed that the combined inhibition of HER2 and EGFR induced overt, long-lasting tumor regression. Our results suggest promising therapeutic opportunities in cetuximab-resistant patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, whose medical treatment in the chemorefractory setting remains an unmet clinical need. Significance: Direct transfer xenografts of tumor surgical specimens conserve the interindividual diversity and the genetic heterogeneity typical of the tumors of origin, combining the flexibility of preclinical analysis with the informative value of population-based studies. Our suite of patient-derived xenografts from metastatic colorectal carcinomas reliably mimicked disease response in humans, prospectively recapitulated biomarker-based case stratification, and identified HER2 as a predictor of resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies and of response to combination therapies against HER2 and epidermal growth factor receptor in this tumor setting. Cancer Discovery; 1(6); 508–23. ©2011 AACR. Read the Commentary on this article by Ciardiello and Normanno, p. 472 This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 457