Rudolf Suppes

Mr. Rudolf Suppes

RWTH Aachen University, Institute of Mineral Resources Engineering (MRE)
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2021 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Rudolf SuppesRudolf Suppes
Rudolf Suppes
SHSoraya Heuss-Aßbichler
Soraya Heuss-Aßbichler

1 September 2019 in Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Rudolf SuppesRudolf Suppes
Rudolf Suppes
AEArian Ebrahimi
Arian Ebrahimi
JKJonas Krampe
Jonas Krampe

16 March 2021 in Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Rudolf SuppesRudolf Suppes
Rudolf Suppes
SHSoraya Heuss-Aßbichler
Soraya Heuss-Aßbichler
Mapping the raw material (RM) potential of anthropogenic RMs, such as tailings, requires a comprehensive assessment and classification. However, a simple procedure to quickly screen for potentially viable RMs recovery projects similar to reconnaissance exploration of natural mineral RMs is missing. In this article, a quick and efficient approach to systematically screen tailings storage facilities (TSFs) is presented to evaluate if a particular TSF meets the criteria to be assessed in a more advanced study including costly on-site exploration. Based on aspects related to a TSF’s contents, physical structure, surroundings, potential environmental and social impacts, and potentially affected stakeholders, it guides its user in compiling the information at local scale in a structured manner compliant with the United Nations Framework Classification for Resources (UNFC). The test application to the TSF Bollrich (Germany), situated in a complex environment close to various stakeholders, demonstrates that a quick and remote assessment with publicly accessible information is possible. Since an assessment of tailings under conventional classification codes from the primary mining industry neglects relevant aspects, it is concluded that tailings should be considered as anthropogenic RMs. The developed screening approach can help to create a TSF inventory which captures project potentials and barriers comprehensively.

29 October 2021 in Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Rudolf SuppesRudolf Suppes
Rudolf Suppes
SHSoraya Heuss-Aßbichler
Soraya Heuss-Aßbichler
A sustainable raw materials (RMs) recovery from waste requires a comprehensive generation and communication of knowledge on project potentials and barriers. However, a standardised procedure to capture sustainability aspects in early project development phases is currently missing. Thus, studies on different RM sources are not directly comparable. In this article, an approach is presented which guides its user through a practical interpretation of on-site exploration data on tailings compliant with the United Nations Framework Classification for Resources (UNFC). The development status of the overall project and the recovery of individual RMs are differentiated. To make the assessment results quickly comparable across different studies, they are summarised in a heat-map-like categorisation matrix. In Part I of this study, it is demonstrated with the case study tailings storage facility Bollrich (Germany) how a tailings mining project can be assessed by means of remote screening. In Part II, it is shown how to develop a project from first on-site exploration to a decision whether to intensify costly on-site exploration. It is concluded that with a UNFC-compliant assessment and classification approach, local sustainability aspects can be identified, and a commonly acceptable solution for different stakeholder perspectives can be derived.

6 December 2021 in Journal of Spectroscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YOYaron Ogen
Yaron Ogen
MDMichael Denk
Michael Denk
CGCornelia Glaesser
Cornelia Glaesser
HEHolger Eichstaedt
Holger Eichstaedt
RKRene Kahnt
Rene Kahnt
TOTsedendamba Oyunbuyan
Tsedendamba Oyunbuyan
Reflectance spectroscopy is a nondestructive, rapid, and easy-to-use technique which can be used to assess the composition of rocks qualitatively or quantitatively. Although it is a powerful tool, it has its limitations especially when it comes to measurements of rocks with a phaneritic texture. The external variability is reflected only in spectroscopy and not in the chemical-mineralogical measurements that are performed on crushed rock in certified laboratories. Hence, the spectral variability of the surface of an uncrushed rock will, in most cases, be higher than the internal chemical-mineralogical variability, which may impair statistical models built on field measurements. For this reason, studying ore-bearing rocks and evaluating their spectral variability in different scales is an important procedure to better understand the factors that may influence the qualitative and quantitative analysis of the rocks. The objectives are to quantify the spectral variability of three types of altered granodiorite using well-established statistical methods with an upscaling approach. With this approach, the samples were measured in the laboratory under supervised ambient conditions and in the field under semisupervised conditions. This study further aims to conclude which statistical method provides the best practical and accurate classification for use in future studies. Our results showed that all statistical methods enable the separation of the rock types, although two types of rocks have exhibited almost identical spectra. Furthermore, the statistical methods that supplied the most significant results for classification purposes were principal component analysis combined with k-nearest neighbor with a classification accuracy for laboratory and field measurements of 68.1 and 100, respectively.