Maria Goulielmaki

Dr. Maria Goulielmaki

National Hellenic Research Foundation, Athens, Attikí, Greece
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 December 2018 in Stem Cell Research & Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ICIoannis Christodoulou
Ioannis Christodoulou
MGMaria Goulielmaki
Maria Goulielmaki
MDMarina Devetzi
Marina Devetzi
Mihalis PanayiotidisMihalis Panayiotidis
Mihalis Panayiotidis
Georgios KoliakosGeorgios Koliakos
Georgios Koliakos
VZVassilis Zoumpourlis
Vassilis Zoumpourlis
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) comprise a heterogeneous population of rapidly proliferating cells that can be isolated from adult (e.g., bone marrow, adipose tissue) as well as fetal (e.g., umbilical cord) tissues (termed bone marrow (BM)-, adipose tissue (AT)-, and umbilical cord (UC)-MSC, respectively) and are capable of differentiation into a wide range of non-hematopoietic cell types. An additional, unique attribute of MSC is their ability to home to tumor sites and to interact with the local supportive microenvironment which rapidly conceptualized into MSC-based experimental cancer cytotherapy at the turn of the century. Towards this purpose, both naïve (unmodified) and genetically modified MSC (GM-MSC; used as delivery vehicles for the controlled expression and release of antitumorigenic molecules) have been employed using well-established in vitro and in vivo cancer models, albeit with variable success. The first approach is hampered by contradictory findings regarding the effects of naïve MSC of different origins on tumor growth and metastasis, largely attributed to inherent biological heterogeneity of MSC as well as experimental discrepancies. In the second case, although the anti-cancer effect of GM-MSC is markedly improved over that of naïve cells, it is yet apparent that some protocols are more efficient against some types of cancer than others. Regardless, in order to maximize therapeutic consistency and efficacy, a deeper understanding of the complex interaction between MSC and the tumor microenvironment is required, as well as examination of the role of key experimental parameters in shaping the final cytotherapy outcome. This systematic review represents, to the best of our knowledge, the first thorough evaluation of the impact of experimental anti-cancer therapies based on MSC of human origin (with special focus on human BM-/AT-/UC-MSC). Importantly, we dissect the commonalities and differences as well as address the shortcomings of work accumulated over the last two decades and discuss how this information can serve as a guide map for optimal experimental design implementation ultimately aiding the effective transition into clinical trials.

21 October 2014 in Oncotarget
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EOEftychia Oikonomou
Eftychia Oikonomou
EKEvangelos Koustas
Evangelos Koustas
MGMaria Goulielmaki
Maria Goulielmaki
APAlexander Pintzas
Alexander Pintzas
BRAF vs RAS oncogenes: Are mutations of the same pathway equal? Differential signalling and therapeutic implications BRAF vs RAS oncogenes: are mutations of the same pathway equal? differential signalling and therapeutic implications

9 July 2020 in Molecular Medicine Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBStella Baliou
Stella Baliou
AKAnthony M. Kyriakopoulos
Anthony M. Kyriakopoulos
MGMaria Goulielmaki
Maria Goulielmaki
Mihalis PanayiotidisMihalis Panayiotidis
Mihalis Panayiotidis
DSDemetrios A. Spandidos
Demetrios A. Spandidos
VZVassilis Zoumpourlis
Vassilis Zoumpourlis
Taurine (2‑aminoethanesulfonic acid) contributes to homeostasis, mainly through its antioxidant and osmoregulatory properties. Taurine's influx and efflux are mainly mediated through the ubiquitous expression of the sodium/chloride‑dependent taurine transporter, located on the plasma membrane. The significance of the taurine transporter has been shown in various organ malfunctions in taurine‑transporter‑null mice. The taurine transporter differentially responds to various cellular stimuli including ionic environment, electrochemical charge, and pH changes. The renal system has been used as a model to evaluate the factors that significantly determine the regulation of taurine transporter regulation.

30 July 2020 in Molecular Medicine Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VZVassilis Zoumpourlis
Vassilis Zoumpourlis
MGMaria Goulielmaki
Maria Goulielmaki
EREmmanouil Rizos
Emmanouil Rizos
Stella BaliouStella Baliou
Stella Baliou
DSDemetrios A. Spandidos
Demetrios A. Spandidos
The coronavirus disease‑2019 (COVID‑19) pandemic, caused by the new coronavirus SARS‑CoV‑2, has spread around the globe with unprecedented consequences for the health of millions of people. While the pandemic is still in progress, with new incidents being reported every day, the resilience of the global society is constantly being challenged. Under these circumstances, the future seems uncertain. SARS‑CoV‑2 coronavirus has spread panic among civilians and insecurity at all socio‑political and economic levels, dramatically disrupting everyday life, global economy, international travel and trade. The disease has also been linked to the onset of depression in many individuals due to the extreme restriction measures that have been taken for the prevention of the rapid spreading of COVID‑19. First, the socio‑economic, political and psychological implications of the COVID‑19 pandemic were explored. Substantial evidence is provided for the consequences of the pandemic on all aspects of everyday life, while at the same time we unravel the role and the pursuits of national regimes during this unforeseen situation. The second goal of this review is related to the scientific aspect of the pandemic. Hence, we explain why SARS‑CoV‑2 is not a so‑called ‘invisible enemy’, and also attempt to give insight regarding the origin of the virus, in an effort to reject the conspiracy theories that have arisen during the pandemic. Finally, rational strategies were investigated for successful vaccine development. We are optimistic that this review will complement the knowledge of specialized scientists and inform non‑specialized readers on basic scientific questions, and also on the social and economic implications of the COVID‑19 pandemic.

18 January 2016 in Oncotarget
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MGMaria Goulielmaki
Maria Goulielmaki
EKEvangelos Koustas
Evangelos Koustas
EMEirini Moysidou
Eirini Moysidou
MVMargarita Vlassi
Margarita Vlassi
TSTakehiko Sasazuki
Takehiko Sasazuki
APAlexander Pintzas
Alexander Pintzas
BRAF associated autophagy exploitation: BRAF and autophagy inhibitors synergise to efficiently overcome resistance of BRAF mutant colorectal cancer cells

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ATArsinoe C. Thomaidou
Arsinoe C. Thomaidou
PBPanagiota Batsaki
Panagiota Batsaki
MAMaria Adamaki
Maria Adamaki
MGMaria Goulielmaki
Maria Goulielmaki
Constantin N. BaxevanisConstantin N. Baxevanis
Constantin N. Baxevanis
SFSotirios P. Fortis
Sotirios P. Fortis
Head and neck cancers (HNCs) comprise a heterogeneous group of tumors that extend from the oral cavity to the upper gastrointestinal tract. The principal etiologic factors for oral tumors include tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption, while human papillomavirus (HPV) infections have been accused of a high incidence of pharyngeal tumors. Accordingly, HPV detection has been extensively used to categorize carcinomas of the head and neck. The diverse nature of HNC highlights the necessity for novel, sensitive, and precise biomarkers for the prompt diagnosis of the disease, its successful monitoring, and the timely prognosis of patient clinical outcomes. In this context, the identification of certain microRNAs (miRNAs) and/or the detection of alterations in their expression patterns, in a variety of somatic fluids and tissues, could serve as valuable biomarkers for precision oncology. In the present review, we summarize some of the most frequently studied miRNAs (including miR-21, -375, -99, -34a, -200, -31, -125a/b, -196a/b, -9, -181a, -155, -146a, -23a, -16, -29, and let-7), their role as biomarkers, and their implication in HNC pathogenesis. Moreover, we designate the potential of given miRNAs and miRNA signatures as novel diagnostic and prognostic tools for successful patient stratification. Finally, we discuss the currently ongoing clinical trials that aim to identify the diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic utility of miRNAs in HNC.