Edoardo Monfrini

Dr. Edoardo Monfrini

Neurology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Lombardy, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 July 2020 in Movement Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SPSimona Petrucci
Simona Petrucci
MGMonia Ginevrino
Monia Ginevrino
ITIlaria Trezzi
Ilaria Trezzi
Edoardo MonfriniEdoardo Monfrini
Edoardo Monfrini
LRLucia Ricciardi
Lucia Ricciardi
EVEnza Maria Valente
Enza Maria Valente


27 January 2024 in British Medical Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LTL Trevisan
L Trevisan
AGAndrea Gaudio
Andrea Gaudio
Edoardo MonfriniEdoardo Monfrini
Edoardo Monfrini
LAL Avanzino
L Avanzino
Alessio Di FonzoAlessio Di Fonzo
Alessio Di Fonzo
PMPaola Mandich
Paola Mandich
Background: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder and is clinically characterized by the presence of motor (bradykinesia, rigidity, rest tremor and postural instability) and non-motor symptoms (cognitive impairment, autonomic dysfunction, sleep disorders, depression and hyposmia). The aetiology of PD is unknown except for a small but significant contribution of monogenic forms. Sources of data: No new data were generated or analyzed in support of this review. Areas of agreement: Up to 15% of PD patients carry pathogenic variants in PD-associated genes. Some of these genes are associated with mendelian inheritance, while others act as risk factors. Genetic background influences age of onset, disease course, prognosis and therapeutic response. Areas of controversy: Genetic testing is not routinely offered in the clinical setting, but it may have relevant implications, especially in terms of prognosis, response to therapies and inclusion in clinical trials. Widely adopted clinical guidelines on genetic testing are still lacking and open to debate. Some new genetic associations are still awaiting confirmation, and selecting the appropriate genes to be included in diagnostic panels represents a difficult task. Finally, it is still under study whether (and to which degree) specific genetic forms may influence the outcome of PD therapies. Growing points: Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) may represent a useful tool to genetically stratify the population in terms of disease risk, prognosis and therapeutic outcomes. Areas timely for developing research: The application of PRS and integrated multi-omics in PD promises to improve the personalized care of patients.

19 April 2021 in Brain
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Edoardo MonfriniEdoardo Monfrini
Edoardo Monfrini
MZMichael Zech
Michael Zech
DSDora Steel
Dora Steel
MKManju A Kurian
Manju A Kurian
JWJuliane Winkelmann
Juliane Winkelmann
Alessio Di FonzoAlessio Di Fonzo
Alessio Di Fonzo
The “homotypic fusion and protein sorting” (HOPS) complex is the structural bridge necessary for the fusion of late endosomes and autophagosomes with lysosomes. Recent publications linked mutations in genes encoding HOPS complex proteins with the etiopathogenesis of inherited dystonias (i.e., VPS16, VPS41, and VPS11). Functional and microstructural studies conducted on patient-derived fibroblasts carrying mutations of HOPS complex subunits displayed clear abnormalities of the lysosomal and autophagic compartments. We propose to name HOPS-associated Neurological Disorders (HOPSANDs) this group of diseases, which are mainly characterized by dystonic presentations. The delineation of HOPSANDs further confirms the connection of lysosomal and autophagic dysfunction with the pathogenesis of dystonia, prompting researchers to find innovative therapies targeting this pathway.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Edoardo MonfriniEdoardo Monfrini
Edoardo Monfrini
FAFederica Arienti
Federica Arienti
PRPaola Rinchetti
Paola Rinchetti
FLFrancesco Lotti
Francesco Lotti
GRGiulietta Maria Riboldi
Giulietta Maria Riboldi
Many conditions can present with accumulation of calcium in the brain and manifest with a variety of neurological symptoms. Brain calcifications can be primary (idiopathic or genetic) or secondary to various pathological conditions (e.g., calcium–phosphate metabolism derangement, autoimmune disorders and infections, among others). A set of causative genes associated with primary familial brain calcification (PFBC) has now been identified, and include genes such as SLC20A2, PDGFB, PDGFRB, XPR1, MYORG, and JAM2. However, many more genes are known to be linked with complex syndromes characterized by brain calcifications and additional neurologic and systemic manifestations. Of note, many of these genes encode for proteins involved in cerebrovascular and blood–brain barrier functions, which both represent key anatomical structures related to these pathological phenomena. As a growing number of genes associated with brain calcifications is identified, pathways involved in these conditions are beginning to be understood. Our comprehensive review of the genetic, molecular, and clinical aspects of brain calcifications offers a framework for clinicians and researchers in the field.

23 May 2018 in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Alessio Di FonzoAlessio Di Fonzo
Alessio Di Fonzo
Edoardo MonfriniEdoardo Monfrini
Edoardo Monfrini
RERoberto Erro
Roberto Erro