Delay to formalin fixation may invalidate hormone receptors and HER2 analyses. Invalid results of tumor markers could significantly alter the type of adjuvant therapy a patient receives and potentially impact outcome. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of progressive delay to formalin fixation on breast cancer biomarkers. Ten palpable invasive breast cancers were resected and underwent immediate gross evaluation. For each case, the procured tumor was divided into eight parts and consecutively fixed after 0, 10, 30 min, 1, 2, 4, and 8 h; one section was kept in saline and stored overnight at 4°C. Two tissue microarray blocks were constructed. Estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization were carried out. Statistical analyses including non-parametric sign test, exact McNemar's test and Page's L test were used. All 10 cases were invasive ductal carcinomas. Q score 6 was identified in five cases for estrogen receptor and four for progesterone receptor. Mean Q score started to decline at the 2 h mark for estrogen receptor and 1 h mark for progesterone receptor. Lowest score was at 8 h mark for estrogen receptor and overnight for progesterone receptor. HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization started to be compromised for interpretation at the 1 h mark and became statistically significant at the 2 h mark (P<0.03). To avoid delay to formalin fixation as a factor negatively affecting on breast biomarkers, we recommend not to delay formalin fixation for more than 1 h and not to store specimens overnight.

Studies have shown that ALDH1A1 expression in the breast is associated with worse clinical outcome. ALDH1A1 inactivates cyclophosphamide, which is an integral agent in breast cancer chemotherapy regimens. The purposes of this study were to verify these results, to correlate ALDH1A1 expression with clinical outcome in patients treated with cyclophosphamide as part of the chemotherapy (adjuvant or neoadjuvant), and to evaluate ALDH1A1 as a useful marker to predict the clinical outcome of breast cancer subsets. A total of 513 primary breast cancers were studied. Tissue microarrays of the studied cases were stained with ALDH1A1. Key clinicopathological information was obtained. Disease-free survival and overall survival were calculated. Patients with neoadjuvant therapy who had substantial residual cancer burden (RCB) were included in the study. Fisher's exact test and Kaplan–Meier methods were used for statistical analysis. ALDH1A1 was expressed in 53 (10%) patients, with a higher frequency in triple negative, followed by HER2+, and finally hormonal receptor+/HER2− (P<0.0001). Tumors with advanced stage, node-positive, or larger tumor size were correlated with ALDH1A1 expression (P=0.006, P<0.0001, and P=0.05, respectively). ALDH1A1 expression was also correlated with worse disease-free survival (P<0.006) and overall survival (P<0.01) in patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In all, 8 of 22 (36%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and died of disease-expressed ALDH1A1 (P=0.008). Similarly, 8 of 23 (35%) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and had tumor recurrence expressed this marker (P=0.002). The risk of recurrence was fivefold greater than negative ALDH1A1 tumors. The risk of recurrence became 11-fold greater when cyclophosphamide but not trastuzumab was part of the regimen. Our results are consistent with previous studies. Moreover, we found that ALDH1A1 could be a useful marker to predict worse clinical outcome after chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting with substantial RCB. However, a larger cohort is required to verify our results.

Background: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has been shown to be associated with gastric cancer. However, inconsistent findings have been reported regarding the distribution of EBV infected cells (in normal gastric epithelium vs. intestinal metaplastic cells vs. in neoplastic cells) and the characteristics of EBV-associated gastric cancer. Lymph node positive EBV-associated gastric cancer has not been systematically studied. The aims of this study were to evaluate EBV-associated gastric cancer, to assess the distribution of EBV infected cells including all positive lymph nodes, and to define the characteristics of EBV-associated gastric cancer. Design: The study included primary gastric cancer patients who underwent surgical resection with no preoperative treatment at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1987 and 2006. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from these resection specimens were assessed for EBV by in situ hybridization, the gold standard for EBV detection in tissue. EBV status was analyzed along with clinicopathologic parameters including age, gender, tumor type, lymph node status, and pathologic stage of the tumor. Results: Among 235 patients, 12 had intranuclear expression of EBV. EBV staining was seen only in tumor cells and no detectable EBV was observed in normal gastric mucosa, intestinal metaplasia or stromal cells. Eight of 12 patients with EBV-associated gastric cancer had regional lymph node metastasis. Of note, metastatic tumor cells in all of the involved lymph nodes of these 8 cases contained EBV. The epidemiologic data showed 11 of the 12 patients with EBV-associated gastric cancer were men, ranging in age from 54 to 78 years (mean age, 60 years; median age, 62.1 years). The age distribution for non-EBV associated gastric cancer patients ranged from 21 to 93 years (mean age, 67 years; median age, 66.4 years). Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that EBV is present exclusively in gastric cancer cells. The detection of EBV in tumor cells in all of the lymph nodes involved with metastatic gastric carcinoma suggests simultaneous replication of EBV and tumor cells. The predominantly male gender and relatively younger age observed for the EBV-infected gastric cancer cases suggest an association between this disease and other factors, such as life style.

The gold standard of examining breast biomarkers, including estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/Ki-67, is to perform these assays on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. However, preanalytical variables may confound these assays. One of these factors is delay to formalin fixation (DFF). The purpose of this review is to evaluate each study that investigated the effect of DFF on breast biomarkers and other molecules. Thirteen primary research articles were identified by the literature search. The credibility of the studies was judged based on the degree of controlling other confounding factors. Nine studies had a prospective design with a high number of controlled variables. Most of the studies concluded that DFF had an effect on ER/PR/HER2. Some of these studies showed that DFF had negative effect on other markers used either clinically or for research purposes. The vast majority of the studies agree that DFF has negative effect on breast biomarkers.