Society 5.0 is a new term used to indicate the future world. This society is based on ubiquity, learning machines, the internet of things, big data, cloud computing, cryptography, and biometrics. All these technologies will be merged to create a new mode of life. The new way of life will inevitably influence human beings’ values, concepts, and conduct. The result of these changes will consequently bring challenges to many legal areas. This paper addresses the challenges that brought society 5.0 to legal norms. It utilises the analytical approach to examine the capability of pre-existing legal norms to cope with new realities created by society 5.0. The paper analyses the legal implications of society 5.0 in their sociological context. It presents a jurisprudential vision to establish legal norms compatible with the new society. Three fundamental principles should be considered to establish new legal. First, social facts that trigger legal regulation can simultaneously occur in multiple places. Secondly, what the study called duality of legal rules will not survive in society 5.0 era. Third, the paper turns the spotlight on new intelligent systems which may introduce new law addressees.

A combination of 3D printing techniques and synthetic biology, 3D bioprinting is a promising field. It is expected that 3D bioprinting technologies will have applications across an array of fields, spanning biotechnology, medical surgery and the pharmaceutical industry. Nonetheless, the progress of these technologies could be hindered, unless there is adequate and effective protection for related applications. In this article, the authors examine the patent eligibility of 3D bioprinting technologies. This issue raises concern given that existing patent systems are generally averse to nature-derived inventions and many of them exclude products of nature or discoveries from patentability. This qualitative study analyses the current patent systems in key jurisdictions, particularly, the U.S. and the EU, and their applicability, as well as effectiveness, in the context of 3D bioprinting. The study argues that the main reason for the apathy of existing patent systems towards bio-inventions is that they were designed to deal with mechanical inventions. It suggests an innovation framework that encompasses both mechanical and biological inventions to cater adequately to emerging technologies.

Lockdowns were among the control measures taken by many countries to hinder the virus from rapidly spreading. Public places had to be closed, including schools, as children are among the vulnerable groups that must always be protected. The primary purpose of this article is to explain children’s rights to education based on the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and the Sustainable Development Goals 2030 (SDG 2030). This article further investigates the consequences of COVID-19 lockdowns for ensuring that privilege for children. The article applies a qualitative method and observed that the lockdown strategy created challenges for all children with respect to receiving education, as the traditional learning pedagogy involving face-to-face meetings forcibly replaced by online learning. The principle of the best interest of the child is a primary consideration. In conclusion, governments must be responsible for providing all necessities to support education for all children, which is essential for human development.

The rapid evolution of digital technology and the widespread demand for online content have facilitated the rise of digital piracy, posing significant challenges to copyright protection. In Malaysia, digital piracy undermines copyright owners' revenue potential and creative incentives, causing substantial financial losses across various industries. Malaysia has incorporated site-blocking mechanisms under section 263 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 and section 43C(2) of the Copyright Act 1987 to combat this issue. These measures aim to disrupt access to websites hosting pirated content, deterring illegal copyright consumption. However, the effectiveness of these mechanisms is continually challenged by the adaptive tactics of digital pirates, jurisdictional limitations, and technical workarounds that allow access to pirated content despite blocking attempts. Determining whether these site-blocking mechanisms effectively protect copyright owners' content against digital piracy necessitates a thorough evaluation of their strengths and weaknesses and a consideration of modern strategies for improvement within those acts. This paper hence will explore the current overview of site-blocking in Malaysia, identify the gaps in improvements and propose recommendations for enhancing the site-blocking frameworks to more effectively combat digital piracy and protect copyright owners' content against digital piracy in the currently evolving digital space.