Cell differentiation, proliferation and migration are essential processes in tissue regeneration. Experimental evidence confirms that cell differentiation or proliferation can be regulated according to the extracellular matrix stiffness. For instance, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can differentiate to neuroblast, chondrocyte or osteoblast within matrices mimicking the stiffness of their native substrate. However, the precise mechanisms by which the substrate stiffness governs cell differentiation or proliferation are not well known. Therefore, a mechano-sensing computational model is here developed to elucidate how substrate stiffness regulates cell differentiation and/or proliferation during cell migration. In agreement with experimental observations, it is assumed that internal deformation of the cell (a mechanical signal) together with the cell maturation state directly coordinates cell differentiation and/or proliferation. Our findings indicate that MSC differentiation to neurogenic, chondrogenic or osteogenic lineage specifications occurs within soft (0.1-1 kPa), intermediate (20-25 kPa) or hard (30-45 kPa) substrates, respectively. These results are consistent with well-known experimental observations. Remarkably, when a MSC differentiate to a compatible phenotype, the average net traction force depends on the substrate stiffness in such a way that it might increase in intermediate and hard substrates but it would reduce in a soft matrix. However, in all cases the average net traction force considerably increases at the instant of cell proliferation because of cell-cell interaction. Moreover cell differentiation and proliferation accelerate with increasing substrate stiffness due to the decrease in the cell maturation time. Thus, the model provides insights to explain the hypothesis that substrate stiffness plays a key role in regulating cell fate during mechanotaxis.

In silico models and computer simulation are invaluable tools to better understand complex biological processes such as cancer evolution. However, the complexity of the biological environment, with many cell mechanisms in response to changing physical and chemical external stimuli, makes the associated mathematical models highly non-linear and multiparametric. One of the main problems of these models is the determination of the parameters’ values, which are usually fitted for specific conditions, making the conclusions drawn difficult to generalise. We analyse here an important biological problem: the evolution of hypoxia-driven migratory structures in Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM), the most aggressive and lethal primary brain tumour. We establish a mathematical model considering the interaction of the tumour cells with oxygen concentration in what is called the go or grow paradigm. We reproduce in this work three different experiments, showing the main GBM structures (pseudopalisade and necrotic core formation), only changing the initial and boundary conditions. We prove that it is possible to obtain versatile mathematical tools which, together with a sound parametric analysis, allow to explain complex biological phenomena. We show the utility of this hybrid “biomimetic in vitro-in silico” platform to help to elucidate the mechanisms involved in cancer processes, to better understand the role of the different phenomena, to test new scientific hypotheses and to design new data-driven experiments.

The broad possibilities offered by microfluidic devices in relation to massive data monitoring and acquisition open the door to the use of deep learning technologies in a very promising field: cell culture monitoring. In this work, we develop a methodology for parameter identification in cell culture from fluorescence images using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). We apply this methodology to the in vitro study of glioblastoma (GBM), the most common, aggressive and lethal primary brain tumour. In particular, the aim is to predict the three parameters defining the go or grow GBM behaviour, which is determinant for the tumour prognosis and response to treatment. The data used to train the network are obtained from a mathematical model, previously validated with in vitro experimental results. The resulting CNN provides remarkably accurate predictions (Pearson's ρ > 0.99 for all the parameters). Besides, it proves to be sound, to filter noise and to generalise. After training and validation with synthetic data, we predict the parameters corresponding to a real image of a microfluidic experiment. The obtained results show good performance of the CNN. The proposed technique may set the first steps towards patient-specific tools, able to predict in real-time the tumour evolution for each particular patient, thanks to a combined in vitro-in silico approach.