Silvia Corcione

Dr. Silvia Corcione

1. Department of Medical Sciences, Infectious Diseases, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
+1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 April 2015 in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MTMario Tumbarello
Mario Tumbarello
ETEnrico Maria Trecarichi
Enrico Maria Trecarichi
FRFrancesco Giuseppe De Rosa
Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa
Maddalena GiannellaMaddalena Giannella
Maddalena Giannella
Daniele Roberto GiacobbeDaniele Roberto Giacobbe
Daniele Roberto Giacobbe
OAon behalf of ISGRI-SITA (Italian Study Group on Resistant Infections of the Società Italiana Terapia Antinfettiva)
on behalf of ISGRI-SITA (Italian Study Group on Resistant Infections of the Società Italiana Terapia Antinfettiva)
Infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kp) carbapenemase (KPC)-producing strains of Kp have become a significant threat in recent years. To assess their outcomes and identify risk factors for 14 day mortality, we conducted a 4 year (2010–13) retrospective cohort study in five large Italian teaching hospitals. The cohort included 661 adults with bloodstream infections (BSIs; n = 447) or non-bacteraemic infections (lower respiratory tract, intra-abdominal structure, urinary tract or other sites) caused by a KPC-Kp isolate. All had received ≥48 h of therapy (empirical and/or non-empirical) with at least one drug to which the isolate was susceptible. Most deaths occurred within 2 weeks of infection onset (14 day mortality: 225/661, 34.1%). Logistic regression analysis identified BSI (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.34–3.29), presentation with septic shock (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.47–4.08), inadequate empirical antimicrobial therapy (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.01–2.18), chronic renal failure (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.44–3.58), high APACHE III score (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04–1.07) and colistin-resistant isolates (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.37–3.46) as independent predictors of 14 day mortality. Combination therapy with at least two drugs displaying in vitro activity against the isolate was associated with lower mortality (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.35–0.77), in particular in patients with BSIs, lung infections or high APACHE III scores and/or septic shock at infection onset. Combinations that included meropenem were associated with significantly higher survival rates when the KPC-Kp isolate had a meropenem MIC of ≤8 mg/L. KPC-Kp infections are associated with high mortality. Treatment with two or more drugs displaying activity against the isolate improves survival, mainly in patients who are critically ill.

14 June 2019 in Critical Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMatteo Bassetti
Matteo Bassetti
Daniele Roberto GiacobbeDaniele Roberto Giacobbe
Daniele Roberto Giacobbe
AVAntonio Vena
Antonio Vena
CTCecilia Trucchi
Cecilia Trucchi
FAFilippo Ansaldi
Filippo Ansaldi
PMphilippe montravers
philippe montravers
The objective of this study was to assess the cumulative incidence of invasive candidiasis (IC) in intensive care units (ICUs) in Europe. A multinational, multicenter, retrospective study was conducted in 23 ICUs in 9 European countries, representing the first phase of the candidemia/intra-abdominal candidiasis in European ICU project (EUCANDICU). During the study period, 570 episodes of ICU-acquired IC were observed, with a cumulative incidence of 7.07 episodes per 1000 ICU admissions, with important between-center variability. Separated, non-mutually exclusive cumulative incidences of candidemia and IAC were 5.52 and 1.84 episodes per 1000 ICU admissions, respectively. Crude 30-day mortality was 42%. Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04 per year, 95% CI 1.02–1.06, p < 0.001), severe hepatic failure (OR 3.25, 95% 1.31–8.08, p 0.011), SOFA score at the onset of IC (OR 1.11 per point, 95% CI 1.04–1.17, p 0.001), and septic shock (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.24–3.63, p 0.006) were associated with increased 30-day mortality in a secondary, exploratory analysis. The cumulative incidence of IC in 23 European ICUs was 7.07 episodes per 1000 ICU admissions. Future in-depth analyses will allow explaining part of the observed between-center variability, with the ultimate aim of helping to improve local infection control and antifungal stewardship projects and interventions.

1 December 2014 in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maddalena GiannellaMaddalena Giannella
Maddalena Giannella
ETEnrico Maria Trecarichi
Enrico Maria Trecarichi
FRFrancesco Giuseppe De Rosa
Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa
VBV. Del Bono
V. Del Bono
MBM. Bassetti
M. Bassetti
MTM. Tumbarello
M. Tumbarello
Knowledge of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-KP) colonization is important to prevent nosocomial spread but also to start prompt adequate antibiotic therapy in patients with suspicion of infection. However, few studies have examined the incidence and risk factors for CR-KP bloodstream infection (BSI) among rectal carriers. To identify risk factors for CR-KP BSI among carriers, we performed a multicentre prospective matched case-control study of all adult CR-KP rectal carriers hospitalized in five tertiary teaching hospitals in Italy over a 2-year period. Carriers who developed CR-KP BSI were compared with those who did not develop subsequent BSI. Overall, 143 CR-KP BSIs were compared with 572 controls without a documented infection during their hospitalization. Multivariate analysis revealed that admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.05-2.59; p 0.03), abdominal invasive procedure (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.16-3.04; p 0.01), chemotherapy/radiation therapy (OR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.78-5.29; p <0.0001), and number of additional colonization sites (OR, 3.37 per site; 95% CI, 2.56-4.43; p <0.0001) were independent risk factors for CR-KP BSI development among CR-KP rectal carriers. A CR-KP BSI risk score ranging from 0 to 28 was developed based on these four independent variables. At a cut-off of ≥2 the model exhibited a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 93%, 42%, 29% and 93%, respectively. Colonization at multiple sites with CR-KP was the strongest predictor of BSI development in our large cohort of CR-KP rectal carriers.

1 December 2015 in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Daniele Roberto GiacobbeDaniele Roberto Giacobbe
Daniele Roberto Giacobbe
VBV. Del Bono
V. Del Bono
ETEnrico Maria Trecarichi
Enrico Maria Trecarichi
FRFrancesco Giuseppe De Rosa
Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa
Maddalena GiannellaMaddalena Giannella
Maddalena Giannella
MTM. Tumbarello
M. Tumbarello

3 February 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Daniele Roberto GiacobbeDaniele Roberto Giacobbe
Daniele Roberto Giacobbe
Denise BattagliniDenise Battaglini
Denise Battaglini
EEElisa Martina Enrile
Elisa Martina Enrile
CDChiara Dentone
Chiara Dentone
AVAntonio Vena
Antonio Vena
MBMatteo Bassetti
Matteo Bassetti
The primary objective of this multicenter, observational, retrospective study was to assess the incidence rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in intensive care units (ICU). The secondary objective was to assess predictors of 30-day case-fatality of VAP. From 15 February to 15 May 2020, 586 COVID-19 patients were admitted to the participating ICU. Of them, 171 developed VAP (29%) and were included in the study. The incidence rate of VAP was of 18 events per 1000 ventilator days (95% confidence intervals [CI] 16–21). Deep respiratory cultures were available and positive in 77/171 patients (45%). The most frequent organisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (27/77, 35%) and Staphylococcus aureus (18/77, 23%). The 30-day case-fatality of VAP was 46% (78/171). In multivariable analysis, septic shock at VAP onset (odds ratio [OR] 3.30, 95% CI 1.43–7.61, p = 0.005) and acute respiratory distress syndrome at VAP onset (OR 13.21, 95% CI 3.05–57.26, p < 0.001) were associated with fatality. In conclusion, VAP is frequent in critically ill COVID-19 patients. The related high fatality is likely the sum of the unfavorable prognostic impacts of the underlying viral and the superimposed bacterial diseases.

9 February 2020 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AVAntonio Vena
Antonio Vena
Daniele Roberto GiacobbeDaniele Roberto Giacobbe
Daniele Roberto Giacobbe
NCNadia Castaldo
Nadia Castaldo
ACANNA MARIA CATTELAN
ANNA MARIA CATTELAN
CMCristina Mussini
Cristina Mussini
FGfor the Ceftabuse Study Group
for the Ceftabuse Study Group
Background: Experience in real clinical practice with ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of serious infections due to gram−negative bacteria (GNB) other than carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) is very limited. Methods: We carried out a retrospective multicenter study of patients hospitalized in 13 Italian hospitals who received ≥72 h of ceftazidime-avibactam for GNB other than CRE to assess the rates of clinical success, resistance development, and occurrence of adverse events. Results: Ceftazidime-avibactam was used to treat 41 patients with GNB infections other than CRE. Median age was 62 years and 68% of them were male. The main causative agents were P. aeruginosa (33/41; 80.5%) and extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales (4/41, 9.8%). Four patients had polymicrobial infections. All strains were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. The most common primary infection was nosocomial pneumonia (n = 20; 48.8%), primary bacteremia (n = 7; 17.1%), intra-abdominal infection (n = 4; 9.8%), and bone infection (n = 4; 9.8%). Ceftazidime-avibactam was mainly administered as a combination treatment (n = 33; 80.5%) and the median length of therapy was 13 days. Clinical success at the end of the follow-up period was 90.5%, and the only risk factor for treatment failure at multivariate analysis was receiving continuous renal replacement therapy during ceftazidime-avibactam. There was no association between clinical failures and type of primary infection, microbiological isolates, and monotherapy with ceftazidime-avibactam. Only one patient experienced recurrent infection 5 days after the end of treatment. Development of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam was not detected in any case during the whole follow-up period. No adverse events related to ceftazidime-avibactam were observed in the study population. Conclusions: Ceftazidime-avibactam may be a valuable therapeutic option for serious infections due to GNB other than CRE.