Glyn Howatson

Prof. Glyn Howatson

University of Northumbria, Newcastle, United Kingdom
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 April 2015 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCTom Clifford
Tom Clifford
Glyn HowatsonGlyn Howatson
Glyn Howatson
DWDaniel West
Daniel West
ESEmma Stevenson
Emma Stevenson
In recent years there has been a growing interest in the biological activity of red beetroot (Beta vulgaris rubra) and its potential utility as a health promoting and disease preventing functional food. As a source of nitrate, beetroot ingestion provides a natural means of increasing in vivo nitric oxide (NO) availability and has emerged as a potential strategy to prevent and manage pathologies associated with diminished NO bioavailability, notably hypertension and endothelial function. Beetroot is also being considered as a promising therapeutic treatment in a range of clinical pathologies associated with oxidative stress and inflammation. Its constituents, most notably the betalain pigments, display potent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and chemo-preventive activity in vitro and in vivo. The purpose of this review is to discuss beetroot’s biological activity and to evaluate evidence from studies that specifically investigated the effect of beetroot supplementation on inflammation, oxidative stress, cognition and endothelial function.

1 January 2008 in Sports Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Glyn HowatsonGlyn Howatson
Glyn Howatson
KSKen A van Someren
Ken A van Someren

17 October 2020 in Experimental Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PAPaul Ansdell
Paul Ansdell
KTKevin Thomas
Kevin Thomas
Kirsty HicksKirsty Hicks
Kirsty Hicks
SHSandra K. Hunter
Sandra K. Hunter
Glyn HowatsonGlyn Howatson
Glyn Howatson
Stuart GoodallStuart Goodall
Stuart Goodall
New Findings: What is the topic of this review?We review sex differences within physiological systems implicated in exercise performance; specifically, how they integrate to determine metabolic thresholds and fatigability. Thereafter, we discuss the implications that these sex differences might have for long‐term adaptation to exercise. What advances does it highlight?The review collates evidence from recent physiological studies that have investigated sex as a biological variable, demonstrating that the physiological response to equivalent ‘dosages’ of exercise is not the same in males and females; thus, highlighting the need to research diversity in physiological responses to interventions. The anatomical and physiological differences between males and females are thought to determine differences in the limits of human performance. The notion of studying sex as a biological variable has recently been emphasized in the biosciences as a vital step in enhancing human health. In this review, we contend that the effects of biological sex on acute and chronic responses must be studied and accounted for when prescribing aerobic exercise, much like any intervention targeting the optimization of physiological function. Emerging evidence suggests that the response of physiological systems to exercise differs between males and females, potentially mediating the beneficial effects in healthy and clinical populations. We highlight evidence that integrative metabolic thresholds during exercise are influenced by phenotypical sex differences throughout many physiological systems. Furthermore, we discuss evidence that female skeletal muscle is more resistant to fatigue elicited by equivalent dosages of high‐intensity exercise. How the different acute responses affect the long‐term trainability of males and females is considered, with discussion about tailoring exercise to the characteristics of the individual presented within the context of biological sex. Finally, we highlight the influence of endogenous and exogenous sex hormones on physiological responses to exercise in females. Sex is one of many mediating influences on the outcomes of exercise, and with careful experimental designs, physiologists can advance the collective understanding of diversity in physiology and optimize outcomes for both sexes.

21 October 2009 in Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Glyn HowatsonGlyn Howatson
Glyn Howatson
MMM. P. McHugh
M. P. McHugh
JHJ. A. Hill
J. A. Hill
JBJ. Brouner
J. Brouner
AJA. P. Jewell
A. P. Jewell
SHS. A. Howatson
S. A. Howatson

15 August 2018 in European Journal of Sport Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DODaniel J. Owens
Daniel J. Owens
CTCraig Twist
Craig Twist
JCJames N. Cobley
James N. Cobley
Glyn HowatsonGlyn Howatson
Glyn Howatson
GCGraeme Close
Graeme Close
Exercise‐induced muscle damage (EIMD) is characterized by symptoms that present both immediately and for up to 14 days after the initial exercise bout. The main consequence of EIMD for the athlete is the loss of skeletal muscle function and soreness. As such, numerous nutrients and functional foods have been examined for their potential to ameliorate the effects of EIMD and accelerate recovery, which is the purpose of many nutritional strategies for the athlete. However, the trade‐off between recovery and adaptation is rarely considered. For example, many nutritional interventions described in this review target oxidative stress and inflammation, both thought to contribute to EIMD but are also crucial for the recovery and adaptation process. This calls into question whether long term administration of supplements and functional foods used to target EIMD is indeed best practice. This rapidly growing area of sports nutrition will benefit from careful consideration of the potential hormetic effect of long term use of nutritional aids that ameliorate muscle damage. This review provides a concise overview of what EIMD is, its causes and consequences and critically evaluates potential nutritional strategies to ameliorate EIMD. We present a pragmatic practical summary that can be adopted by practitioners and direct future research, with the purpose of pushing the field to better consider the fine balance between recovery and adaptation and the potential that nutritional interventions have in modulating this balance.

22 September 2011 in British Journal of Sports Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJonathan Leeder
Jonathan Leeder
CGConor Gissane
Conor Gissane
KSKen van Someren
Ken van Someren
WGWarren Gregson
Warren Gregson
Glyn HowatsonGlyn Howatson
Glyn Howatson
Physiological stress induced by intense exercise is associated with energy substrate depletion, hyperthermia, mechanical muscle damage, oxidative stress, inflammation and nervous system fatigue. The resulting symptoms manifest as reduced performance potential, likely due to increased muscle soreness and decreased muscle function,2 disturbed muscle position sense and reaction time3 as well as increased stiffness and swelling that can last for several days.4 The aetiology of reduced performance potential will vary depending upon the exact physiological stress being recovered from. For example, eccentric exercise is associated with a large mechanical stress and relatively low metabolic cost,5 whereas intermittent sprint exercise may involve both a large mechanical stress and a heightened metabolic cost.6 It is possible that the underlying time course of recovery between different exercise stressors is different, and this consequently may influence how recovery strategies could be implemented. For the purpose of this review, exercise will be subdivided into two categories: ‘eccentric exercise’ that refers to the stress caused from exercise incorporating high mechanical stress (eg, eccentric contractions) and ‘high-intensity exercise’ that refers to stress caused from exercise with a high metabolic cost as well as some elements of eccentric muscle contractions (eg, repeat sprint sports).