Plastic, an offer of modernity, has become one of the essential parts of our everyday life. However, it is presenting a massive threat in altered forms, to our health and environment. Plastic does not only pollute the surface environment, freshwater, and marine ecosystems, but toxic elements released from plastics also percolate down the surface and contaminate groundwater, which we often use as ‘safe’ drinking water. This probable future risk is deeply rooted in the entire governance infrastructure of plastic waste which could potentially lead to contamination of groundwater. Thus, a state-sponsored ‘safe drinking water’ initiative could contrarily produce a ‘risk society’. A recent study finds 81% of tap water samples collected worldwide contained plastic pollutants, which means that annually we may be ingesting between 3000 and 4000 microparticles of plastic from tap water. Based on review, ethnographic observations and interviews, and lived experience in a plastic-wrapped city (Dhaka), this paper sheds light on the complex interface of plastic, water, and public health, on the relevance of Beck’s ‘risk society’ to understand this complexity, and on replicating the idea of ‘risk society’ in the case of Bangladesh. Through understanding the plastic–groundwater–waste management nexus, this paper highlights and advocates for a new strategy of plastic governance in modern states.

Most empirical research on drinking water governance and regional transformations in Bangladesh has focused on developed and urban regions. We focus on coastal rural areas to address this gap and employ a three-step methodology for the systematic analysis of the broader and site-specific drinking water landscape, involving (i) stakeholder analysis and mapping to identify key actors and characteristics, (ii) field work to identify case study sites, meet stakeholders and identify local water technologies, and (iii) in-depth analysis, triangulating stakeholders, drinking water technologies and governance structures, to identify synergies, differences, gaps and overlaps within them. Taking four different but illustrative case study areas in the Southwestern coastal region of Bangladesh, we identify key stakeholders and capture the multiplicity and dynamism of governance models. We provide the first in-depth mapping of the drinking water landscape in coastal rural Bangladesh. Results reveal a fragmented rural water governance landscape, marked by failed or non-functional technologies due to disputes, poor maintenance, high costs, and lack of accountability after project completion, leaving communities to seek alternative water resources for themselves. We argue that informal water provision currently needs to exist beyond well-known governance models due to system inefficiencies and short legacies of implemented technologies. As the water deficit is predicted to increase, it is imperative to identify the complexities and inefficiencies in governance structures to construct collaborative, sustainable approaches to ensuring drinking water security.