Ghrelin, a hormone produced and secreted from the stomach, is prim arily known as an appetite stimulant. Recently, it has emerged as a potential regulator/biomarker of cancer progression. Inconsistent results on this subject make this body of literature difficult to interpret. Here, we attempt to identify commonalities in the relationships between ghrelin and various cancers, and summarize important considerations for future research. The main players in the ghrelin family axis are unacylated ghrelin (UAG), acylated ghrelin (AG), the enzyme ghrelin O-acyltransferase (GOAT), and the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR). GOAT is responsible for the acylation of ghrelin, after which ghrelin can bind to the functional ghrelin receptor GHSR-1a to initiate the activation cascade. Splice variants of ghrelin also exist, with the most prominent being In1-ghrelin. In this review, we focus primarily on the potential of In1-ghrelin as a biomarker for cancer progression, the unique characteristics of UAG and AG, the importance of the two known receptor variants GHSR-1a and 1b, as well as the possible mechanisms through which the ghrelin axis acts. Further understanding of the role of the ghrelin axis in tumor cell proliferation could lead to the development of novel therapeutic approaches for various cancers.

Background Women with obesity and/or type-II-diabetes have an increased breast cancer risk, increased metastasis, and poorer prognosis, especially after menopause. In a rat model of high-fat-diet and menopause-induced weight gain, we previously reported that treatment with the anti-diabetic drug metformin for 8-weeks after ovariectomy (OVX; modeling menopause) reduced growth of existing mammary tumors and inhibited new tumor formation. This identified the menopause transition as a potential window-of-opportunity for interventions to decrease obesity-associated breast cancer incidence and disease progression. Here, we extend these findings to determine if limiting metformin to the peak window of OVX-induced weight gain would have similar anti-cancer effects. Findings Metformin during the first four weeks following OVX is critical to reducing tumor burden, as rats treated with metformin early (weeks0-4-postOVX) had reduced tumor burden. Conversely, initiating metformin later in the postOVX period (weeks 4-8postOVX) did not reduce cancer burden. Despite improved tumor outcomes, metformin withdrawal after the early postOVX time had detrimental metabolic effects, including weight gain and increased adiposity, insulin, IGF1, and HOMA-IR, which correlate with increased cancer risk. Conclusions These data reveal early-postmenopause as a critical window when metformin decreases progression of existing disease and highlights the importance of maintaining treatment to prevent metabolic dysregulation, which could promote secondary tumors/metastasis. These findings also help explain the disconnect between epidemiological studies reporting anticancer benefits of metformin and more recent clinical trials that failed to see similar efficacy, potentially due to issues of timing and/or inclusion of women outside the early postmenopausal window and/or without underlying metabolic dysfunction.