Alex E Hoetink

Dr. Alex E Hoetink

Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 June 2004 in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHAlex E Hoetink
Alex E Hoetink
TFTh.J.C. Faes
Th.J.C. Faes
KVK.R. Visser
K.R. Visser
RHR.M. Heethaar
R.M. Heethaar
Experiments presented in the literature show that the electrical conductivity of flowing blood depends on flow velocity. The aim of this study is to extend the Maxwell-Fricke theory, developed for a dilute suspension of ellipsoidal particles in an electrolyte, to explain this flow dependency of the conductivity of blood for stationary laminar flow in a rigid cylindrical tube. Furthermore, these theoretical results are compared to earlier published measurement results. To develop the theory, we assumed that blood is a Newtonian fluid and that red blood cells can be represented by oblate ellipsoids. If blood flows through a cylindrical tube, shear stresses will deform and align the red blood cells with one of their long axes aligned parallel to the stream lines. The pathway of a low-frequency (<1 MHz) alternating electrical current will be altered by this orientation and deformation of the red blood cells. Consequently, the electrical conductivity in the flow direction of blood increases. The theoretically predicted flow dependency of the conductivity of blood corresponds well with experimental results. This theoretical study shows that red blood cell orientation and deformation can explain quantitatively the flow dependency of blood conductivity.

1 October 2021 in JAMA Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMAnnelot J. M. Meijer
Annelot J. M. Meijer
MHMarry M. van Den Heuvel-Eibrink
Marry M. van Den Heuvel-Eibrink
BBBeth Brooks
Beth Brooks
AZAntoinette G. Am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen
Antoinette G. Am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen
KKKristin R. Knight
Kristin R. Knight
RBRalf A. Boerboom
Ralf A. Boerboom
Importance Ototoxicity is an irreversible direct and late effect of certain childhood cancer treatments. Audiologic surveillance during therapy as part of the supportive care pathway enables early detection of hearing loss, decision-making about ongoing cancer treatment, and, when applicable, the timely use of audiologic interventions. Pediatric oncologic clinical practice and treatment trials have tended to be driven by tumor type and tumor-specific working groups. Internationally accepted standardized recommendations for monitoring hearing during treatment have not previously been agreed on. Objective To provide standard recommendations on hearing loss monitoring during childhood cancer therapy for clinical practice. Methods An Ototoxicity Task Force was formed under the umbrella of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology, consisting of international audiologists, otolaryngologists, and leaders in the field of relevant pediatric oncology tumor groups. Consensus meetings conducted by experts were organized, aimed at providing standardized recommendations on age-directed testing, timing, and frequency of monitoring during cancer treatment based on literature and consensus. Consensus statements were prepared by the core group, adapted following several videoconferences, and finally agreed on by the expert panel. Findings The consensus reached was that children who receive ototoxic cancer treatment (platinum agents, cranial irradiation, and/or brain surgery) require a baseline case history, monitoring of their middle ear and inner ear function, and assessment of tinnitus at each audiologic follow-up. As a minimum, age-appropriate testing should be performed before and at the end of treatment. Ideally, audiometry with counseling before each cisplatin cycle should be considered in the context of the individual patient, specific disease, feasibility, and available resources. Conclusions and Relevance This is an international multidisciplinary consensus report providing standardized supportive care recommendations on hearing monitoring in children undergoing potentially ototoxic cancer treatment. The recommendations are intended to improve the care of children with cancer and facilitate comparative research on the timing and development of hearing loss caused by different cancer treatment regimens.

14 July 2021 in npj Precision Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMA. J. M. Meijer
A. J. M. Meijer
FDFranciscus Antonius Diepstraten
Franciscus Antonius Diepstraten
TLT. Langer
T. Langer
LBL. Broer
L. Broer
IDI. K. Domingo
I. K. Domingo
TCthe CPNDS Consortium
the CPNDS Consortium
In children with cancer, the heterogeneity in ototoxicity occurrence after similar treatment suggests a role for genetic susceptibility. Using a genome-wide association study (GWAS) approach, we identified a genetic variant in TCERG1L (rs893507) to be associated with hearing loss in 390 non-cranial irradiated, cisplatin-treated children with cancer. These results were replicated in two independent, similarly treated cohorts (n = 192 and 188, respectively) (combined cohort: P = 5.3 × 10−10, OR 3.11, 95% CI 2.2–4.5). Modulating TCERG1L expression in cultured human cells revealed significantly altered cellular responses to cisplatin-induced cytokine secretion and toxicity. These results contribute to insights into the genetic and pathophysiological basis of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity.

14 December 2021 in JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FDF A Diepstraten
F A Diepstraten
AHAlex E Hoetink
Alex E Hoetink
MGM van Grotel
M van Grotel
AHA D R Huitema
A D R Huitema
RSR J Stokroos
R J Stokroos
AMA J M Meijer
A J M Meijer
Background: Ototoxicity has been reported after administration of aminoglycosides and glycopeptides.Objectives: To identify available evidence for the occurrence and determinants of aminoglycoside- and glycopeptide-related ototoxicity in children.Materials and methods: Systematic electronic literature searches that combined ototoxicity (hearing loss, tinnitus and/or vertigo) with intravenous aminoglycoside and/or glycopeptide administration in children were performed in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. Studies with sample sizes of ≥50 children were included. The QUIPS tool and Cochrane criteria were used to assess the quality and risk of bias of included studies.Results: Twenty-nine aminoglycoside-ototoxicity studies met the selection criteria (including 7 randomized controlled trials). Overall study quality was medium/low. The frequency of hearing loss within these studies ranged from 0%–57%, whereas the frequency of tinnitus and vertigo ranged between 0%–53% and 0%–79%, respectively. Two studies met the criteria on glycopeptide-induced ototoxicity and reported hearing loss frequencies of 54% and 55%. Hearing loss frequencies were higher in gentamicin-treated children compared to those treated with other aminoglycosides. In available studies aminoglycosides had most often been administered concomitantly with platinum agents, diuretics and other co-medication.Conclusions: In children the reported occurrence of aminoglycoside/glycopeptide ototoxicity highly varies and seems to depend on the diagnosis, aminoglycoside subtype and use of co-administered medication. More research is needed to investigate the prevalence and determinants of aminoglycoside/glycopeptide ototoxicity. Our results indicate that age-dependent audiological examination may be considered for children frequently treated with aminoglycosides/glycopeptides especially if combined with other ototoxic medication.

1 January 2009 in International Journal of Audiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHAlex E Hoetink
Alex E Hoetink
LKLaszlo Körössy
Laszlo Körössy
WDWouter A. Dreschler
Wouter A. Dreschler
Digital noise reduction systems in modern digital hearing aids aim to improve either speech intelligibility or listening comfort. Little is known, however, about the actual gain reduction produced by different noise reduction systems. The aim of this study is to compare the gain reduction of different noise reduction systems. We applied a systematic variation of different presentation levels of the input signal, different signal-to-noise ratios, and different target hearing loss configurations. The gain reduction of 12 different hearing aids was compared both qualitatively and quantitatively by means of principal value decomposition. The results show that these hearing aids differ considerably in their responses. These differences are presented qualitatively by plotting contour maps that give the gain reduction as function of signal-to-noise-ratio and frequency. The quantitative analysis shows that the gain reduction produced by most hearing aids can be characterized by two transfer functions. The most important being an overall gain reduction. In addition to this, the frequency response is tilted to achieve either more low-frequency reduction and less high-frequency reduction, or the opposite.

1 March 2019 in Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAnnelot J.M. Meijer
Annelot J.M. Meijer
ECEva Clemens
Eva Clemens
AHAlex E Hoetink
Alex E Hoetink
MGMartine van Grotel
Martine van Grotel
MHMarry M. van Den Heuvel-Eibrink
Marry M. van Den Heuvel-Eibrink