Tiancheng Li

Prof. Tiancheng Li

Key Laboratory of Information Fusion Technology, School of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 April 2015 in IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Tiancheng LiTiancheng Li
Tiancheng Li
MBMiodrag Bolic
Miodrag Bolic
Petar M. DjuricPetar M. Djuric
Petar M. Djuric
Two decades ago, with the publication, we witnessed the rebirth of particle filtering (PF) as a methodology for sequential signal processing. Since then, PF has become very popular because of its ability to process observations represented by nonlinear state-space models where the noises of the model can be non-Gaussian. This methodology has been adopted in various fields, including finance, geophysical systems, wireless communications, control, navigation and tracking, and robotics. The popularity of PF has also spurred the publication of several review articles. In this article, the state of the art of resampling methods was reviewed. The methods were classified and their properties were compared in the framework of the proposed classifications. The emphasis in the article was on the classification and qualitative descriptions of the algorithms. The intention was to provide guidelines to practitioners and researchers.

1 June 2014 in Expert Systems with Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Tiancheng LiTiancheng Li
Tiancheng Li
SSShudong Sun
Shudong Sun
TSTariq Pervez Sattar
Tariq Pervez Sattar
Juan CorchadoJuan Corchado
Juan Corchado
During the last two decades there has been a growing interest in Particle Filtering (PF). However, PF suffers from two long-standing problems that are referred to as sample degeneracy and impoverishment. We are investigating methods that are particularly efficient at Particle Distribution Optimization (PDO) to fight sample degeneracy and impoverishment, with an emphasis on intelligence choices. These methods benefit from such methods as Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, Mean-shift algorithms, artificial intelligence algorithms (e.g., Particle Swarm Optimization, Genetic Algorithm and Ant Colony Optimization), machine learning approaches (e.g., clustering, splitting and merging) and their hybrids, forming a coherent standpoint to enhance the particle filter. The working mechanism, interrelationship, pros and cons of these approaches are provided. In addition, Approaches that are effective for dealing with high-dimensionality are reviewed. While improving the filter performance in terms of accuracy, robustness and convergence, it is noted that advanced techniques employed in PF often causes additional computational requirement that will in turn sacrifice improvement obtained in real life filtering. This fact, hidden in pure simulations, deserves the attention of the users and designers of new filters.Comment: Expert Systems with Applications, 201

23 November 2017 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XWXuedong Wang
Xuedong Wang
Tiancheng LiTiancheng Li
Tiancheng Li
SSShudong Sun
Shudong Sun
Juan CorchadoJuan Corchado
Juan Corchado
We review some advances of the particle filtering (PF) algorithm that have been achieved in the last decade in the context of target tracking, with regard to either a single target or multiple targets in the presence of false or missing data. The first part of our review is on remarkable achievements that have been made for the single-target PF from several aspects including importance proposal, computing efficiency, particle degeneracy/impoverishment and constrained/multi-modal systems. The second part of our review is on analyzing the intractable challenges raised within the general multitarget (multi-sensor) tracking due to random target birth and termination, false alarm, misdetection, measurement-to-track (M2T) uncertainty and track uncertainty. The mainstream multitarget PF approaches consist of two main classes, one based on M2T association approaches and the other not such as the finite set statistics-based PF. In either case, significant challenges remain due to unknown tracking scenarios and integrated tracking management.

1 November 2019 in Information Fusion
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Tiancheng LiTiancheng Li
Tiancheng Li
HFHongqi Fan
Hongqi Fan
JGJesús García
Jesús García
Juan CorchadoJuan Corchado
Juan Corchado

6 April 2020 in IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Tiancheng LiTiancheng Li
Tiancheng Li
XWXiaoxu Wang
Xiaoxu Wang
YLYan Liang
Yan Liang
QPQuan Pan
Quan Pan

1 July 2012 in Signal Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Tiancheng LiTiancheng Li
Tiancheng Li
TSTariq Pervez Sattar
Tariq Pervez Sattar
SSShudong Sun
Shudong Sun