Samuel Marashli

Mr. Samuel Marashli

Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 August 2022 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MOManfred J. Oswald
Manfred J. Oswald
YHYechao Han
Yechao Han
HLHan Li
Han Li
Samuel MarashliSamuel Marashli
Samuel Marashli
DODeniz Nouri Oglo
Deniz Nouri Oglo
Rohini KunerRohini Kuner
Rohini Kuner
The basal nucleus of Meynert (NBM) subserves critically important functions in attention, arousal and cognition via its profound modulation of neocortical activity and is emerging as a key target in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s dementias. Despite the crucial role of neocortical domains in pain perception, however, the NBM has not been studied in models of chronic pain. Here, using in vivo tetrode recordings in behaving mice, we report that beta and gamma oscillatory activity is evoked in the NBM by noxious stimuli and is facilitated at peak inflammatory pain-like behavior. Optogenetic and chemogenetic cell-specific, reversible manipulations of NBM cholinergic-GABAergic neurons reveal their role in endogenous control of nociceptive hypersensitivity, which are manifest via projections to the prelimbic cortex, resulting in layer 5-mediated antinociception. Our data unravel the importance of the NBM in top-down control of neocortical processing of pain-like behavior.

28 October 2022 in Translational Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PJPhilipp Janz
Philipp Janz
MBMarie Bainier
Marie Bainier
Samuel MarashliSamuel Marashli
Samuel Marashli
PSPhilipp Schoenenberger
Philipp Schoenenberger
Miguel ValenciaMiguel Valencia
Miguel Valencia
RRRoger L. Redondo
Roger L. Redondo
Neurexins are presynaptic transmembrane proteins crucial for synapse development and organization. Deletion and missense mutations in all three Neurexin genes have been identified in psychiatric disorders, with mutations in the NRXN1 gene most strongly linked to schizophrenia (SZ) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). While the consequences of NRXN1 deletion have been extensively studied on the synaptic and behavioral levels, circuit endophenotypes that translate to the human condition have not been characterized yet. Therefore, we investigated the electrophysiology of cortico-striatal-thalamic circuits in Nrxn1α−/−rats and wildtype littermates focusing on a set of translational readouts, including spontaneous oscillatory activity, auditory-evoked oscillations and potentials, as well as mismatch negativity-like (MMN) responses and responses to social stimuli. On the behavioral level Nrxn1α−/−rats showed locomotor hyperactivity. In vivo freely moving electrophysiology revealed pronounced increases of spontaneous oscillatory power within the gamma band in all studied brain areas and elevation of gamma coherence in cortico-striatal and thalamocortical circuits of Nrxn1α−/−rats. In contrast, auditory-evoked oscillations driven by chirp-modulated tones showed reduced power in cortical areas confined to slower oscillations. Finally, Nrxn1α−/−rats exhibited altered auditory evoked-potentials and profound deficits in MMN-like responses, explained by reduced prediction error. Despite deficits for auditory stimuli, responses to social stimuli appeared intact. A central hypothesis for psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders is that a disbalance of excitation-to-inhibition is underlying oscillatory and sensory deficits. In a first attempt to explore the impact of inhibitory circuit modulation, we assessed the effects of enhancing tonic inhibition via δ-containing GABAAreceptors (using Gaboxadol) on endophenotypes possibly associated with network hyperexcitability. Pharmacological experiments applying Gaboxadol showed genotype-specific differences, but failed to normalize oscillatory or sensory processing abnormalities. In conclusion, our study revealed endophenotypes in Nrxn1α−/−rats that could be used as translational biomarkers for drug development in psychiatric disorders.

11 October 2024 in Neuropharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PJPhilipp Janz
Philipp Janz
MBMarie Bainier
Marie Bainier
Samuel MarashliSamuel Marashli
Samuel Marashli
SGSimon Gross
Simon Gross
RRRoger L. Redondo
Roger L. Redondo
Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein (FMRP) deficiency. Electroencephalogram (EEG) changes in FXS include alterations of oscillatory activity and responses to sensory stimuli, some of which have been back-translated into rodent models by knocking-out the Fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein 1 gene (Fmr1-KO). However, the validity of these EEG phenotypes as objective biomarkers requires further investigation. Potential pharmacotherapies such as mGluR5 inhibitors (e.g. CTEP; 2-chloro-4-((2,5-dimethyl-1-(4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl)-1H-imidazole-4-yl)ethynyl)pyridine), GABABR agonists (e.g. arbaclofen) and δ-containing GABAAR agonists (e.g. gaboxadol) have not translated into clinical success despite rescuing many phenotypes in the Fmr1-KO model. Yet none of these treatments have been assessed on EEG phenotypes in the Fmr1-KO model. Therefore, we set out to discover new EEG phenotypes in Fmr1-KO mice, using "task-free" and auditory-evoked (AEPs) and visually-evoked potential (VEP) paradigms, and probe their modulation by CTEP, arbaclofen and gaboxadol, using within-subjects designs. First, we report Fmr1-KO-associated EEG abnormalities that closely resemble those observed in FXS, including elevated gamma-band power, reduced alpha/beta-band coherence, increased AEPs and delayed VEPs. Secondly, we found that pharmacological treatment, at best, only partially normalized EEG phenotypes. CTEP restored alpha/beta-band coherence and AEP amplitudes but failed to normalize gamma power and VEP latencies. Conversely, arbaclofen reduced gamma power but did not restore coherence or AEP amplitudes and further delayed VEPs. Gaboxadol did not normalize any EEG phenotypes. We conclude that these compounds have limited ability to normalize these EEG phenotypes.

30 September 2024 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Samuel MarashliSamuel Marashli
Samuel Marashli
PJPhilipp Janz
Philipp Janz
RRRoger L Redondo
Roger L Redondo
Abnormal sensory processing is core to neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders, such as schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders. Developing efficient therapies requires understanding the basic sensory pathways and identifying circuit abnormalities during early development. Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) are well-established biomarkers for auditory processing on the brainstem level. Beyond their advantage of being easily applicable in clinics (given their non-invasive nature), ABRs have high reproducibility in rodents and translate well to humans (e.g. wave identity), despite species differences (e.g. wave features). We hypothesized that ABRs would reveal sensory abnormalities in neurodevelopmental models with construct validity, such as Neurexin1α knockout (Nrxn1α KO) rats during their development. In a previous study, adult Nrxn1α KO rats showed altered cortical auditory-evoked potentials and impaired prediction error to auditory stimuli (Janz in Transl Psychiat, 12:455, 2022 ). This study used ABR measurements to assess brainstem physiology during auditory processing in Nrxn1α KO rats and their wild-type littermates. Therefore, we followed the development trajectories of ABRs from the age of 3 weeks to 12 weeks longitudinally. We found that juvenile Nrxn1α KO rats (3 weeks of age) show altered ABRs, which normalized during further development. This alteration was confined to increased latency in waves II, III, and IV of the ABRs, suggesting impaired auditory processing on the level of the superior olivary complex and inferior colliculus. In conclusion, our results suggest that early but transient deficits in the processing of auditory information on the level of the brainstem are present in Nrxn1α KO rats, which may contribute to later cortical auditory processing deficits observed in adulthood. Our study emphasizes the value of ABRs as a functional readout of auditory brainstem circuit function with potential value as a translational biomarker.

15 March 2024 in BMC Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Samuel MarashliSamuel Marashli
Samuel Marashli
PJPhilipp Janz
Philipp Janz
RRRoger L Redondo
Roger L Redondo
Sensory processing in the auditory brainstem can be studied with auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) across species. There is, however, a limited understanding of ABRs as tools to assess the effect of pharmacological interventions. Therefore, we set out to understand how pharmacological agents that target key transmitter systems of the auditory brainstem circuitry affect ABRs in rats. Given previous studies, demonstrating that Nrxn1α KO Sprague Dawley rats show substantial auditory processing deficits and altered sensitivity to GABAergic modulators, we used both Nrxn1α KO and wild-type littermates in our study. First, we probed how different commonly used anesthetics (isoflurane, ketamine/xylazine, medetomidine) affect ABRs. In the next step, we assessed the effects of different pharmacological compounds (diazepam, gaboxadol, retigabine, nicotine, baclofen, and bitopertin) either under isoflurane or medetomidine anesthesia. We found that under our experimental conditions, ABRs are largely unaffected by diverse pharmacological modulation. Significant modulation was observed with (i) nicotine, affecting the late ABRs components at 90 dB stimulus intensity under isoflurane anesthesia in both genotypes and (ii) retigabine, showing a slight decrease in late ABRs deflections at 80 dB stimulus intensity, mainly in isoflurane anesthetized Nrxn1α KO rats. Our study suggests that ABRs in anesthetized rats are resistant to a wide range of pharmacological modulators, which has important implications for the applicability of ABRs to study auditory brainstem physiology.

1 November 2024 in Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JDJulia Uriach Dasca
Julia Uriach Dasca
Samuel MarashliSamuel Marashli
Samuel Marashli
EHEric C Holland
Eric C Holland
MWMichael Weller
Michael Weller
HWHans-Georg Wirsching
Hans-Georg Wirsching
The neurotransmitter glutamate plays a fundamental role in promoting epilepsy and tumor progression in glioblastoma. Glioblastoma cells secrete glutamate into the tumor microenvironment via the cystine-glutamate antiporter system Xc, leading to neuronal hyperexcitability, excitotoxicity, and tumor cell invasion. Additionally, glutamatergic neuroglioma synapses drive glioma progression in preclinical tumor models. To pharmacologically counteract effects of glutamate in glioblastoma, we employed a triple combination of anti-glutamatergic drugs: gabapentin, sulfasalazine, and memantine, which target glutamate synthesis, release, and post-synaptic signaling, respectively. In genetically engineered murine glioblastoma models, daily treatment with this triple combination prolonged median survival. This survival benefit was not observed with single or double drug combinations, nor with the standard antiepileptic drug levetiracetam, indicating the potential synergy and efficacy of this drug combination beyond merely treating epilepsy. Importantly, these preliminary results support the rationale for the ongoing phase Ib/II randomized clinical trial GLUGLIO, which explores the efficacy of combined gabapentin, sulfasalazine, and memantine in conjunction with standard chemoradiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (NCT05664464).