Background: A significant number of critically ill neonates face potentially adverse prognoses and outcomes, with some of them fulfilling the criteria for perinatal palliative care. When counselling parents about the critical health condition of their child, neonatal healthcare professionals require extensive skills and competencies in palliative care and communication. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the communication patterns and contents between neonatal healthcare professionals and parents of neonates with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions regarding options such as life-sustaining treatment and palliative care in the decision-making process. Methods: A qualitative approach to analysing audio-recorded conversations between neonatal team and parents. Eight critically ill neonates and a total of 16 conversations from two Swiss level III neonatal intensive care units were included. Results: Three main themes were identified: the weight of uncertainty in diagnosis and prognosis, the decision-making process, and palliative care. Uncertainty was observed to impede the discussion about all options of care, including palliative care. Regarding decision-making, neonatologists oftentimes conveyed to parents that this was a shared endeavour. However, parental preferences were not ascertained in the conversations analysed. In most cases, healthcare professionals were leading the discussion and parents expressed their opinion reactively to the information or options received. Only few couples proactively participated in decision-making. The continuation of therapy was often the preferred course of action of the healthcare team and the option of palliative care was not mentioned. However, once the option for palliative care was raised, the parents’ wishes and needs regarding the end-of-life care of their child were obtained, respected, and implemented by the team. Conclusion: Although shared decision-making was a familiar concept in Swiss neonatal intensive care units, parental involvement in the decision-making process illustrated a somewhat different and complex picture. Strict adherence to the concept of certainty might impede the process of decision-making, thereby not discussing palliation and missing opportunities to include parental values and preferences.

Background/Objectives: Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) in late preterm and term neonates accounts for neonatal mortality and unfavorable neurodevelopmental outcomes in survivors despite therapeutic hypothermia (TH) for neuroprotection. The circumstances of death in neonates with HIE, including involvement of neonatal palliative care (NPC) specialists and neurodevelopmental follow-up at 18–24 months in survivors, warrant further evaluation. Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study including neonates ≥ 35 weeks gestational age with moderate to severe HIE receiving TH, registered in the Swiss National Asphyxia and Cooling Register between 2011 and 2021. Neurodevelopmental follow-up at 18–24 months in survivors was assessed. The groups of survivors and deaths were compared regarding perinatal demographic and HIE data. Prognostic factors leading to redirection of care (ROC) were depicted. Results: A total of 137 neonates were included, with 23 (16.8%) deaths and 114 (83.2%) survivors. All but one death (95.7%) occurred after ROC, with death on a median of 3.5 (2–6) days of life. Severe encephalopathy was indicated by a Sarnat score of 3 on admission, seizures were more frequent, and blood lactate values were higher on postnatal days 1 to 4 in neonates who died. Lactate in worst blood gas analysis (unit-adjusted odds ratio 1.25, 95% CI 1.02–1.54, p = 0.0352) was the only variable independently associated with ROC. NPC specialists were involved in one case. Of 114 survivors, 88 (77.2%) had neurodevelopmental assessments, and 21 (23.9%) of those had unfavorable outcomes (moderate to severe disability). Conclusions: Death in neonates with moderate to severe HIE receiving TH almost exclusively occurred after ROC. Parents thus had to make critical decisions and accompany their neonate at end-of-life within the first week of life. Involvement of NPC specialists is encouraged in ROC so that there is continuity of care for the families whether the neonate survives or not.

Background/Objectives: Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) in (near)term neonates accounts for neonatal mortality and unfavorable neurodevelopmental outcome in survivors, despite therapeutic hypothermia (TH) for neuroprotection. The circumstances of death in neonates with HIE and involvement of neonatal palliative care (NPC) specialists warrant further evaluation. Methods: Retrospective multicenter cohort study including neonates ≥ 35 weeks gestational age with moderate to severe HIE receiving TH, registered in the Swiss National Asphyxia and Cooling Register between 2011 and 2021. Neurodevelopmental follow-up at 18-24 months in survivors was assessed. The groups of survivors and deaths were compared regarding perinatal demographic and HIE data. Prognostic factors leading to redirection of care (ROC) were depicted. Results: 137 neonates were included, 23 (16.8%) deaths and 114 (83.2%) survivors. All but one death (95.7%) occurred after ROC with death on median 3.5 (2-6) days of life. Severe encephalopathy indicated by Sarnat score 3 on admission and seizures were more frequent, and blood lactate values were higher on postnatal days 1 to 4 in neonates who died. Lactate in worst blood gas analysis (unit aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.54, p=0.0352) was the only variable independently associated with ROC. NPC specialists were involved in one case. Of 114 survivors, 88 (77.2%) had neurodevelopmental assessments, and 21 (23.9%) of those had unfavorable outcome (moderate to severe disability). Conclusions: Death in neonates with moderate to severe HIE receiving TH almost exclusively occurred after ROC. Parents thus had to take critical decisions and accompany their neonate at end-of-life within the first week of life. To ensure continuity of care for the family, also beyond the death of the neonate, involvement of NPC specialists is encouraged in ROC.

Background: A significant number of critically ill neonates face potentially adverse prognoses and fulfil the criteria for perinatal palliative care. When counselling parents about the critical health condition of their child, neonatal healthcare professionals require extensive skills and competencies in palliative care and communication. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the communication patterns and contents between neonatal healthcare professionals and parents of neonates with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions regarding treatment options such as curative and palliative care in the decision-making process. Methods: A mixed methods research design was employed with a qualitative and quantitative approach to analysing audio-recorded conversations between neonatal team and parents.Eight critically ill neonates and a total of 16 conversations from two Swiss level III neonatal intensive care units were included. Results:Three main themes were identified: the weight of uncertainty in diagnosis and prognosis, the decision-making process, and palliative care. Uncertainty was observed to impede the discussion about all options of care, including palliative care. Regarding decision-making, neonatologists oftentimes conveyed to parents that this was a shared endeavour. However, parental preferences were not ascertained in the conversations analysed. In most cases, healthcare professionals were leading the discussion and parents expressed their opinion reactively to the information or options received. Only few couples proactively participated in decision-making. With regards to palliative care, oftentimes the continuation of therapy was the preferred course of action of the healthcare team and the option of palliative care was not mentioned. However, once the option for palliative care was raised, the parents' wishes and needs regarding the end-of-life care of their child were obtained, respected, and implemented by the team. Conclusion: Although shared decision-making was a familiar concept in Swiss neonatal intensive care units, parental involvement in the decision-making process illustrated a somewhat different and complex picture. Strict adherence to the concept of certainty might impede the process of decision-making, thereby not discussing palliation and missing opportunities to include parental values and preferences.