Background/Objectives: Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are extremely uncommon tumors with a high rate of local recurrence that often require very demolitive surgery. The aim of our study is to propose a specific rehabilitation protocol for patients with STSs, based on the kind of demolition and reconstructive surgery performed, and evaluate its effects. Methods: The protocol was developed on the basis of the clinical experiences of physiatrists and surgeons, as well as data from the literature, recommending timelines for postural steps, verticalization, walking, and therapeutic exercises, in accordance with wound healing times and in order to prevent complications from disuse and immobility. The Barthel Index Scale (BI), the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Adapted Patient Evaluation Conference System (APECS), and the 10 Meter Walk Test (10 MWT) were used to clinically evaluate patients before and after the rehabilitation treatment. Results: Thirty-one patients with primary STSs were enrolled. Following the rehabilitation program, we found a statistically significant improvement in mBI (p < 0.001), APECS (p ≤ 0.001), and NRS (p = 0.001). In a subgroup of patients (n = 18) assessed with the 10 MWT, a statistically significant increase in walking speed was observed (p = 0.012). Conclusions: Patients who completed rehabilitation following the proposed protocol, customized according to the surgical intervention type, demonstrated marked improvements in motor performance, ability in daily activities, walking, and pain. The proposed protocol can assist the multidisciplinary team of surgeons, oncologists, and rehabilitators in maintaining alignment on patient management, thereby ensuring clear indications regarding the activities that patients can and cannot undertake during the recovery period.

Background/Objectives: Robotic rehabilitation holds great potential for improving patient outcomes, but the integration of these technologies into clinical practice is hindered by a lack of comprehensive tools for assessing patients’ needs. This systematic review aimed to identify gaps in the current literature, with a focus on methodologies and tools for evaluating such needs, particularly those based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework. Methods: A systematic review of qualitative studies published between 2021 and 2023 was conducted, updating a previous (2020) review. Studies were identified through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using inclusion criteria focused on qualitative methods capturing patients’ experiences with robotic and technological rehabilitation devices. Results: The review analyzed 19 new studies and 20 from the prior review, revealing a reliance on semi-structured interviews targeting small, heterogeneous populations. No studies employed standardized ICF-based tools, and gaps were noted in the exploration of conditions such as Parkinson’s disease, frailty, or conditions that allowed for multi-device experiences. Conclusions: The findings emphasize the necessity for tailored surveys grounded in the ICF framework to completely evaluate the needs of patients suffering from sensory, motor, and/or cognitive disorders caused by different health conditions. This work lays the foundation for more inclusive, effective, and patient-centered robotic rehabilitation strategies.

The COVID-19 sequelae have been shown to affect respiratory and cardiological functions as well as neuro-psychological functions, and, in some cases, metabolic/nutritional aspects. The Italian National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work (Istituto Nazionale Assicurazione Infortuni sul Lavoro, INAIL) recorded that, until December 2022, 315,055 workers were affected by COVID-19; therefore, there is a need to identify an effective approach to treat such patients. Robotic and technological devices could be integrated into the rehabilitation programme of people with long COVID conditions. A review of the literature showed that telerehabilitation may improve functional capacity, dyspnoea, performance, and quality of life in these patients, but no studies were found evaluating the effects of robot-mediated therapy or virtual reality systems. Considering the above, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi and INAIL propose a multi-axial rehabilitation for workers with COVID-19 sequelae. To accomplish this goal, the two institutions merged the epidemiological information gathered by INAIL, the expertise in robotic and technological rehabilitation of Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, and the literature review. Our proposal aims to facilitate a multi-axial rehabilitation approach customized to meet the unique needs of each individual, with a particular emphasis on utilizing advanced technologies to address the current and future challenges of patient care.

Background/Objectives: Despite the well-documented gender differences observed during hospitalisation, research in post-stroke recovery remains limited. This study aims to clarify this topic in subacute post-stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation, considering not only functional and cognitive outcomes but also nutritional status and food consumption. Methods: At admission (T0), patients were assessed for demographic, anamnestic, and clinical data and were diagnosed for malnutrition according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. At T0 and after a six-week rehabilitation program (T1), nutritional status was assessed by anthropometric measurements, serum analysis of albumin, glucose, lipidic, metal, and oxidative stress panel, and the calculation of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index; food consumption was recorded daily. Functional independence in Activities of Daily Living was measured at both T0 and T1 by the modified Barthel Index (mBI), and cognitive impairment was assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), adjusted for age and education. Results: We enrolled 87 patients (mean age 69 ± 12 years; 42 women and 45 men); of these 52.4% of women were malnourished, compared to 33.3% of men. After rehabilitation (T1), women showed higher oxidative stress (549 ± 143 vs. 491 ± 121 UCARR; p = 0.041) and poorer functional outcomes (55.3 ± 26.1 vs. 67.1 ± 21.8; p = 0.032), despite similar cognitive improvements (19.5 ± 6.4 vs. 21.9 ± 5.2; p = 0.060) compared with men. Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of personalised treatment strategies that account for gender-specific differences to optimise recovery in post-stroke patients.

During the COVID-19 emergency, institutional social distancing conditions were established, preventing family and caregivers’ access to rehabilitation departments. Our study goal was to assess inpatients’ and caregivers’ anxiety, depression, and Quality of Life (QoL) during the Italian lockdown due to the pandemic. We investigated anxiety, depression, and QoL in 53 patients and 51 caregivers, using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), and the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF36). These questionnaires were given to patients after one (T0) and two months (T1) since the hospitalization. The BAI showed that anxiety was moderate for 7.5% of patients and 23.5% of caregivers, and severe for 35.8% of patients and 17.6% of caregivers. The BDI found moderate depression in 11.3% of patients and 15.7% of caregivers, and severe depression in 34.0% of patients and 9.8% of caregivers. Depression was higher in patients than caregivers, while no differences were detected in anxiety. Compared to normative data, patients’ QoL declined in all eight SF36 dimensions, while caregivers’ QoL declined only in social, emotional, and mental components. Unexpectedly, patients still hospitalized at T1 showed significant improvements in both anxiety and three QoL subscores. These findings emphasize the importance of psychological support for patients and their families.

Background: Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare and heterogeneous malignancies requiring a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment. Advances in surgical techniques, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy have improved survival rates but often result in significant functional impairments, particularly in patients undergoing limb-sparing procedures. Rehabilitation is crucial for restoring mobility and independence, with recent studies emphasizing the importance of personalized rehabilitation protocols tailored to specific surgical interventions. Quantitative assessments, such as 3D motion capture and surface electromyography, provide objective insights into gait performance and motor function, enabling more precise rehabilitation strategies to optimize recovery. Methods: This study evaluated gait performance in 21 patients with lower-limb impairment following limb-sparing surgery for STS. Patients underwent two instrumented gait assessments using marker-based 3D motion capture and surface electromyography to measure spatiotemporal gait parameters, joint kinematics, and muscle activity. Independence in the activity of daily living was assessed with the modified Barthel Index in both timepoints. Results: Following rehabilitation, patients demonstrated significant improvements in functional independence, as reflected by an increase in the modified Barthel Index (p < 0.001). Gait analysis revealed increased walking speed, stride length, cadence, and improved joint range of motion at the hip, knee, and ankle, though electromyographic analysis showed no statistically significant differences in muscle activation patterns or co-contraction indices. Conclusions: These findings underscore the importance of a rehabilitation programs personalized on gait strategies. A deeper understanding of motor adaptations based on sarcoma location and surgical approach could further refine rehabilitation protocols, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes and quality of life.