Stefano Panzeri

Dr. Stefano Panzeri

Neural Computation Laboratory, Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems@UniTn, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 38068 Rovereto (TN), Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 October 2013 in Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GEGaute T. Einevoll
Gaute T. Einevoll
CKChristoph Kayser
Christoph Kayser
NLNikos K. Logothetis
Nikos K. Logothetis
Stefano PanzeriStefano Panzeri
Stefano Panzeri

1 March 2009 in Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RQRodrigo Quian Quiroga
Rodrigo Quian Quiroga
Stefano PanzeriStefano Panzeri
Stefano Panzeri

31 December 2013 in PLOS Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJoachim Gross
Joachim Gross
NHNienke Hoogenboom
Nienke Hoogenboom
GTGregor Thut
Gregor Thut
PSPhilippe Schyns
Philippe Schyns
Stefano PanzeriStefano Panzeri
Stefano Panzeri
SGSimon Garrod
Simon Garrod
Cortical oscillations are likely candidates for segmentation and coding of continuous speech. Here, we monitored continuous speech processing with magnetoencephalography (MEG) to unravel the principles of speech segmentation and coding. We demonstrate that speech entrains the phase of low-frequency (delta, theta) and the amplitude of high-frequency (gamma) oscillations in the auditory cortex. Phase entrainment is stronger in the right and amplitude entrainment is stronger in the left auditory cortex. Furthermore, edges in the speech envelope phase reset auditory cortex oscillations thereby enhancing their entrainment to speech. This mechanism adapts to the changing physical features of the speech envelope and enables efficient, stimulus-specific speech sampling. Finally, we show that within the auditory cortex, coupling between delta, theta, and gamma oscillations increases following speech edges. Importantly, all couplings (i.e., brain-speech and also within the cortex) attenuate for backward-presented speech, suggesting top-down control. We conclude that segmentation and coding of speech relies on a nested hierarchy of entrained cortical oscillations. Continuous speech is organized into a nested hierarchy of quasi-rhythmic components (prosody, syllables, phonemes) with different time scales. Interestingly, neural activity in the human auditory cortex shows rhythmic modulations with frequencies that match these speech rhythms. Here, we use magnetoencephalography and information theory to study brain oscillations in participants as they process continuous speech. We show that auditory brain oscillations at different frequencies align with the rhythmic structure of speech. This alignment is more precise when participants listen to intelligible rather than unintelligible speech. The onset of speech resets brain oscillations and improves their alignment to speech rhythms; it also improves the alignment between the different frequencies of nested brain oscillations in the auditory cortex. Since these brain oscillations reflect rhythmic changes in neural excitability, they are strong candidates for mediating the segmentation of continuous speech at different time scales corresponding to key speech components such as syllables and phonemes.

1 February 2009 in Neuron
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CKChristoph Kayser
Christoph Kayser
MMMarcelo A. Montemurro
Marcelo A. Montemurro
NLNikos K. Logothetis
Nikos K. Logothetis
Stefano PanzeriStefano Panzeri
Stefano Panzeri

1 March 2010 in Trends in Neurosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Stefano PanzeriStefano Panzeri
Stefano Panzeri
NBNicolas Brunel
Nicolas Brunel
NLNikos K. Logothetis
Nikos K. Logothetis
CKChristoph Kayser
Christoph Kayser

1 September 2007 in Journal of Neurophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Stefano PanzeriStefano Panzeri
Stefano Panzeri
RSRiccardo Senatore
Riccardo Senatore
MMMarcelo A. Montemurro
Marcelo A. Montemurro
RPRasmus S. Petersen
Rasmus S. Petersen
Information Theory enables the quantification of how much information a neuronal response carries about external stimuli and is hence a natural analytic framework for studying neural coding. The main difficulty in its practical application to spike train analysis is that estimates of neuronal information from experimental data are prone to a systematic error (called “bias”). This bias is an inevitable consequence of the limited number of stimulus-response samples that it is possible to record in a real experiment. In this paper, we first explain the origin and the implications of the bias problem in spike train analysis. We then review and evaluate some recent general-purpose methods to correct for sampling bias: the Panzeri-Treves, Quadratic Extrapolation, Best Universal Bound, Nemenman-Shafee-Bialek procedures, and a recently proposed shuffling bias reduction procedure. Finally, we make practical recommendations for the accurate computation of information from spike trains. Our main recommendation is to estimate information using the shuffling bias reduction procedure in combination with one of the other four general purpose bias reduction procedures mentioned in the preceding text. This provides information estimates with acceptable variance and which are unbiased even when the number of trials per stimulus is as small as the number of possible discrete neuronal responses.