Background: this study aims to investigate the accuracy and completeness of ChatGPT in answering questions and solving clinical scenarios of interceptive orthodontics. Materials and Methods: ten specialized orthodontists from ten Italian postgraduate orthodontics schools developed 21 clinical open-ended questions encompassing all of the subspecialities of interceptive orthodontics and 7 comprehensive clinical cases. Questions and scenarios were inputted into ChatGPT4, and the resulting answers were evaluated by the researchers using predefined accuracy (range 1–6) and completeness (range 1–3) Likert scales. Results: For the open-ended questions, the overall median score was 4.9/6 for the accuracy and 2.4/3 for completeness. In addition, the reviewers rated the accuracy of open-ended answers as entirely correct (score 6 on Likert scale) in 40.5% of cases and completeness as entirely correct (score 3 n Likert scale) in 50.5% of cases. As for the clinical cases, the overall median score was 4.9/6 for accuracy and 2.5/3 for completeness. Overall, the reviewers rated the accuracy of clinical case answers as entirely correct in 46% of cases and the completeness of clinical case answers as entirely correct in 54.3% of cases. Conclusions: The results showed a high level of accuracy and completeness in AI responses and a great ability to solve difficult clinical cases, but the answers were not 100% accurate and complete. ChatGPT is not yet sophisticated enough to replace the intellectual work of human beings.

The aim of our study was to demonstrate the role of certain risk factors in reconstructive head and neck surgery with free flaps. The data taken from the charts of all patients who received free flap for head and neck reconstruction in our department between January 2001 and December 2004 were analyzed. We evaluated the association of preexisting risk factors with the onset of surgical complications such as orocutaneous fistulae, flap infections, hematomas, thrombosis, and necrosis. One hundred and twenty-two free flaps have been used for the reconstruction of head and neck area in 118 patients. Preoperative risk factors included smoking habit (77 patients), alcohol use (6 patients), hypertension (9 patients), diabetes mellitus (8 patients), family history positive for vascular disorders (27 patients), and hypercholesterolemia/hypertriglyceridemia (5 patients). The percentage of full flap survival was 95.08%. Statistical analysis showed that diabetes mellitus (P < 0.01) is significantly associated with a negative prognosis for free flap reconstructive operation, whereas a smoking habit seemed to be at the verge of statistical significance. Therefore, our current practice is to prefer as much as possible the use of local flaps as opposed to free flaps in the reconstruction of head and neck defects in diabetic patients.

Composite tissue defects of the mandible and maxilla, after resection of head and neck malignancies, osteoradionecrosis, malformations, or traumas, cause functional and aesthetic problems. Nowadays, microvascular free flaps represent the main choice for the reconstruction of these defects. Among the various flaps proposed, the scapula flap has favorable characteristics that make it suitable for bone, soft tissue, or combined defects. We report 7 cases of reconstruction of complex maxillofacial defects with subscapular system flaps. The patients treated had Romberg syndrome (1 case), malignant tumors (5 cases), and result of previous trauma (1 case). Location of deficit was the maxilla (3 cases), the mandible (2 case), the ethmoidal-maxillary region (1 case) and the upper and middle thirds of the face in the last case. In 2 cases, a parascapular system flap was used; in 5 cases, a composite flap with latissimus dorsi muscle and scapular bone. Neither failure of the harvested flaps nor complications in the donor site were evidenced. A good aesthetic and functional outcome was obtained in all cases. Many free flaps have been proposed for the reconstruction of defects in the maxillofacial region such as fibula, deep circumflex iliac artery, scapula, among the bone flaps; and forearm, rectus abdominis, and anterolateral thigh, among the soft tissue flaps. The choice of the flap to use depends on the length of the bone defect and the amount of soft tissues required. The subscapular system has the advantage of providing different flaps based on the same pedicle. The osteofasciocutaneous scapular free flap, in particular, allows wide mobility of soft tissues (parascapular flap) with respect to its bone component (scapular bone), resulting suitable for defects of large size involving both the soft tissues and the bone. Although the fibula flap and the deep circumflex iliac artery flap remain the first choice for bone reconstructions of the mandible and maxilla, the scapula flap has some features that make its use extremely advantageous in some circumstances. In particular, we advocate the use of the osteomuscular latissimus dorsi-scapula flap for reconstruction of large-volume defects involving the bone and soft tissues, whereas fasciocutaneous parascapular flaps represent a valid alternative to forearm flap and anterolateral thigh flap in the reconstruction of soft tissue defects.