Khalid Hasan

Dr. Khalid Hasan

Orthopedics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, California, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 February 2018 in International Orthopaedics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MAMalik Ahmed
Malik Ahmed
YAYousef Abuodeh
Yousef Abuodeh
AAAbdulJabbar Alhammoud
AbdulJabbar Alhammoud
MSMotasem Salameh
Motasem Salameh
KHKhalid Hasan
Khalid Hasan
GAGhalib Ahmed
Ghalib Ahmed

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSPrasenjit Saha
Prasenjit Saha
MSMatthew Smith
Matthew Smith
KHKhalid Hasan
Khalid Hasan
Intra-articular injections are widely used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes of joint pathologies throughout the body. These injections can be performed blind by utilizing anatomical landmarks or with the use of imaging modalities to directly visualize the joint space during injections. This review of the literature aims to comprehensively identify differences in the accuracy of intra-articular injections via palpation vs. image guidance in the most commonly injected joints in the upper and lower extremities. To our knowledge, there are no such comprehensive reviews available. A narrative literature review was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar databases to identify studies focusing on the accuracy of blind or image-guided intra-articular injections for each joint. A total of 75 articles was included in this review, with blind and image-guided strategies being discussed for the most commonly injected joints of the upper and lower extremities. Varying ranges of accuracy with blind and image-guided modalities were found throughout the literature, though an improvement in accuracy was seen in nearly all joints when using image guidance. Differences are pronounced, particularly in deep joints such as the hip or in the small joints such as those in the hand or foot. Image guidance is a useful adjunct for most intra-articular injections, if available. Though there is an increase in accuracy in nearly all joints, minor differences in accuracy seen in large, easily accessed joints, such as the knee, may not warrant image guidance.

27 June 2017 in International Orthopaedics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EBElhadi Musaab Elhadi Babikir
Elhadi Musaab Elhadi Babikir
EAEyad Daood Al-Maqdassy
Eyad Daood Al-Maqdassy
KHKhalid Hasan
Khalid Hasan
SHShamsi Abdul Hameed
Shamsi Abdul Hameed
AAAbduljabbar Alhammoud
Abduljabbar Alhammoud
MAMohammed Mubarak Al-Ateeq Al-Dosari
Mohammed Mubarak Al-Ateeq Al-Dosari

4 January 2023 in Cureus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSSalman Shiraz
Salman Shiraz
MSMohammad Shujauddin
Mohammad Shujauddin
KHKhalid Hasan
Khalid Hasan
AEAhmed Elramadi
Ahmed Elramadi
GAGhalib Ahmed
Ghalib Ahmed
Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) are two well-accepted modes of surgical treatments for intertrochanteric (IT) hip fractures. While studies have extensively explored the efficacy of one over the other in unstable fractures, the comparison is sparsely available for stable fractures. The main aim of this study is to compare DHS or PFN corrective surgeries in cases of stable IT fractures operated at the Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar, between 2016 and 2018. We conducted a retrospective data review of all stable IT fractures operated at the Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar, between 2016 and 2018. Data were extracted from electronic medical CERNER records, including demographics, clinical notes, operative reports, radiographs, and imaging reports. Data review was followed by prospective data collection via phone about the current post-operative functional status of all cases. Data analysis was done on SPSS v.23. Study was approved by Medical Research Center (MRC) and Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC). Study Protocol ID: MRC-01-19-108 Out of 62 stable IT fractures operated at our center during the study period, 42 underwent DHS correction, while 20 had PFN. The mean age of the studied cohort was 66.56 years (± 15.95). Males were twice more than females. The mean duration of surgery was 83.73 minutes for DHS and 120.25 minutes for PFN. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Differences in intraoperative blood loss, duration between fracture and surgery, and length of hospital stay were all statistically insignificant. Patients who underwent PFN showed a higher frequency of return to ambulation (assisted and unassisted), while the number of patients with DHS was less for the functional outcome. Similarly, more post-PFN radiographs displayed union than post-DHS radiographs (55% and 38%, respectively). This difference was statistically insignificant. Our study showed promising results for stable IT fractures treated with PFN. However, more data and prospective observational studies are required to establish more statistically significant results.

2 December 2022 in Medicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KHKhalid Hasan
Khalid Hasan
SMSreenivasulu Metikala
Sreenivasulu Metikala
MVMadan Vallem
Madan Vallem
Diabetic Charcot arthropathy of the ankle, due to the presence of multiplanar deformities, and associated medical comorbidities, poses a challenge for treating physicians. The situation becomes more complicated when accompanied by ulceration and osteomyelitis, leaving limited salvage options. We present a case of advanced Charcot ankle arthropathy with osteomyelitis and ulcerated hindfoot. It was managed by talectomy and antibiotic-impregnated cement beads, followed by hindfoot arthrodesis using a retrograde intramedullary nail six weeks later. This two-stage reconstruction approach resulted in an ulcer-free, stable, plantigrade foot at one-year postoperative follow-up.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KHKhalid Hasan
Khalid Hasan
SKShahin Kayum
Shahin Kayum
Patient experience and satisfaction are the keystones in evaluating the effectiveness of clinical care in musculoskeletal medicine. Although all orthopedic settings work on the same principles of providing safe and quality health care, community hospitals represent a unique environment. There may be key differences with regard to patient experience between these settings. Accessibility to care, choices of provider, personalized care, availability of and access to resources, cultural and social variances, and waiting times are a few of the many elements that may impact patient experience and satisfaction. This narrative review aims to explore the core differences in these settings and how they can reflect on patient experience and satisfaction.