To investigate the risk of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different routes of hysterectomy and methods of cuff closure. A multi-institutional analysis of 12,398 patients who underwent hysterectomy for both benign and malignant disease between 1994 and 2008 was performed. We analyzed how different routes of hysterectomy and approaches to cuff suture may influence the risk of development of vaginal dehiscence. Women who had total laparoscopic (n=3,573), abdominal (n=4,291), and vaginal (n=4,534) hysterectomies experienced 23 (0.64%), 9 (0.2%), and 6 (0.13%) cases of vaginal cuff dehiscence, respectively. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a higher incidence of cuff separations, compared with abdominal hysterectomy (0.64% compared with 0.21%, P=.003) and vaginal hysterectomy (0.64% compared with 0.13%, P<.001). Within the endoscopic group, patients who underwent vaginal closure with laparoscopic knots had a higher rate of cuff dehiscence than patients who had suture with transvaginal knots (20 of 2,332 [0.86%] compared with 3 of 1,241 [0.24%], P=.028). When vaginal suture was performed transvaginally, no statistical difference in vaginal cuff dehiscence rate was observed compared with both abdominal hysterectomy (0.24% compared with 0.21%, P=.83) and vaginal hysterectomy (0.24% compared with 0.13%, P=.38). Use of monopolar energy at the time of colpotomy and reducing the power of monopolar energy from 60 watts to 50 watts when colpotomy was performed at the end of total laparoscopic hysterectomy did not alter the rate of cuff separations. Transvaginal suturing appears to reduce the risk of vaginal dehiscence after total laparoscopic hysterectomy. II

The aim of the present review is to summarize the current evidence on the role of pelvic and para‐aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. In 1988, the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology recommended surgical staging for endometrial cancer patients. However, 25 years later, the role of lymph node dissection remains controversial. Although the findings of two large independent randomized trials suggested that pelvic lymphadenectomy provides only adjunctive morbidity with no clear influence on survival outcomes, the studies have many pitfalls that limit interpretation of the results. Theoretically, lymphadenectomy may help identify patients with metastatic dissemination, who may benefit from adjuvant therapy, thus reducing radiation‐related morbidity. Also, lymphadenectomy may eradicate metastatic disease. Because lymphatic spread is relatively uncommon, our main effort should be directed at identifying patients who may potentially benefit from lymph node dissection, thus reducing the rate of unnecessary treatment and associated morbidity. This review will discuss the role of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer, focusing on patient selection, extension of the surgical procedure, postoperative outcomes, quality of life and costs. The need for new surgical studies and efficacious systemic drugs is recommended.