Emily Avery

Dr. Emily Avery

Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 February 2020 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MRMonica D. Rosenberg
Monica D. Rosenberg
DSDustin Scheinost
Dustin Scheinost
AGAbigail S. Greene
Abigail S. Greene
EAEmily Avery
Emily Avery
YKYoung Hye Kwon
Young Hye Kwon
MCMarvin M. Chun
Marvin M. Chun
The ability to sustain attention differs across people and changes within a single person over time. Although recent work has demonstrated that patterns of functional brain connectivity predict individual differences in sustained attention, whether these same patterns capture fluctuations in attention within individuals remains unclear. Here, across five independent studies, we demonstrate that the sustained attention connectome-based predictive model (CPM), a validated model of sustained attention function, generalizes to predict attentional state from data collected across minutes, days, weeks, and months. Furthermore, the sustained attention CPM is sensitive to within-subject state changes induced by propofol as well as sevoflurane, such that individuals show functional connectivity signatures of stronger attentional states when awake than when under deep sedation and light anesthesia. Together, these results demonstrate that fluctuations in attentional state reflect variability in the same functional connectivity patterns that predict individual differences in sustained attention.

1 February 2020 in Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EAEmily Avery
Emily Avery
KYKwangsun Yoo
Kwangsun Yoo
MRMonica D. Rosenberg
Monica D. Rosenberg
AGAbigail S. Greene
Abigail S. Greene
SGSiyuan Gao
Siyuan Gao
MCMarvin M. Chun
Marvin M. Chun
Individual differences in working memory relate to performance differences in general cognitive ability. The neural bases of such individual differences, however, remain poorly understood. Here, using a data-driven technique known as connectome-based predictive modeling, we built models to predict individual working memory performance from whole-brain functional connectivity patterns. Using n-back or rest data from the Human Connectome Project, connectome-based predictive models significantly predicted novel individuals' 2-back accuracy. Model predictions also correlated with measures of fluid intelligence and, with less strength, sustained attention. Separate fluid intelligence models predicted working memory score, as did sustained attention models, again with less strength. Anatomical feature analysis revealed significant overlap between working memory and fluid intelligence models, particularly in utilization of prefrontal and parietal regions, and less overlap in predictive features between working memory and sustained attention models. Furthermore, showing the generality of these models, the working memory model developed from Human Connectome Project data generalized to predict memory in an independent data set of 157 older adults (mean age = 69 years; 48 healthy, 54 amnestic mild cognitive impairment, 55 Alzheimer disease). The present results demonstrate that distributed functional connectivity patterns predict individual variation in working memory capability across the adult life span, correlating with constructs including fluid intelligence and sustained attention.

3 March 2022 in Nature Human Behaviour
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KYKwangsun Yoo
Kwangsun Yoo
MRMonica D. Rosenberg
Monica D. Rosenberg
YKYoung Hye Kwon
Young Hye Kwon
QLQi Lin
Qi Lin
EAEmily Avery
Emily Avery
MCMarvin M. Chun
Marvin M. Chun

1 December 2016 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EAEmily Avery
Emily Avery
JCJocalyn Clark
Jocalyn Clark

1 May 2020 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DSDustin Scheinost
Dustin Scheinost
THTiffany W. Hsu
Tiffany W. Hsu
EAEmily Avery
Emily Avery
MHMichelle Hampson
Michelle Hampson
RCR. Todd Constable
R. Todd Constable
MRMonica D. Rosenberg
Monica D. Rosenberg
Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rt-fMRI) neurofeedback is a non-invasive, non-pharmacological therapeutic tool that may be useful for training behavior and alleviating clinical symptoms. Although previous work has used rt-fMRI to target brain activity in or functional connectivity between a small number of brain regions, there is growing evidence that symptoms and behavior emerge from interactions between a number of distinct brain areas. Here, we propose a new method for rt-fMRI, connectome-based neurofeedback, in which intermittent feedback is based on the strength of complex functional networks spanning hundreds of regions and thousands of functional connections. We first demonstrate the technical feasibility of calculating whole-brain functional connectivity in real-time and provide resources for implementing connectome-based neurofeedback. We next show that this approach can be used to provide accurate feedback about the strength of a previously defined connectome-based model of sustained attention, the saCPM, during task performance. Although, in our initial pilot sample, neurofeedback based on saCPM strength did not improve performance on out-of-scanner attention tasks, future work characterizing effects of network target, training duration, and amount of feedback on the efficacy of rt-fMRI can inform experimental or clinical trial designs.

5 September 2019 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NHNicholas Hindy
Nicholas Hindy
EAEmily Avery
Emily Avery
NTNicholas B. Turk-Browne
Nicholas B. Turk-Browne
When an action is familiar, we are able to anticipate how it will change the state of the world. These expectations can result from retrieval of action-outcome associations in the hippocampus and the reinstatement of anticipated outcomes in visual cortex. How does this role for the hippocampus in action-based prediction change over time? We use high-resolution fMRI and a dual-training behavioral paradigm to examine how the hippocampus interacts with visual cortex during predictive and nonpredictive actions learned either three days earlier or immediately before the scan. Just-learned associations led to comparable background connectivity between the hippocampus and V1/V2, regardless of whether actions predicted outcomes. However, three-day-old associations led to stronger background connectivity and greater differentiation between neural patterns for predictive vs. nonpredictive actions. Hippocampal prediction may initially reflect indiscriminate binding of co-occurring events, with action information pruning weaker associations and leading to more selective and accurate predictions over time.