The integration of product design and supply-chain management can lead to an increase in the profitability and efficiency of companies. However, considering manufacturing, supply chain, and aircraft criteria in the early design phase increases the size of the solutions’ trade space and, thus, the complexity of performing the decision-making process. This paper demonstrates how to leverage value-model theory to simplify the decision-making process when multiple criteria related to multiple systems are considered at the same time. The proposed concurrent approach is formalized from a systems-engineering perspective, considering the interactions between the lifecycle stages of the System of Interest, i.e., the aircraft, and Enabling Systems like the supply chain and manufacturing. A value-based interactive dashboard, called VALORISE, is developed to automatize the process, support decision-makers in modeling their expectations, analyze real-time strategic scenarios, and easily explore the value-driven trade space for best-solution identification. An aeronautical application case highlights the advantages of leveraging the proposed concurrent approach to overcome the limits of traditional approaches, in which decisions about supply chain and manufacturing are addressed once the aircraft configuration is decided.

The on-board design discipline is sometimes ignored during the first aircraft design iterations. It might be understandable when a single on-board system architecture is considered, especially when a conventional architecture is selected. However, seeing the trend towards systems electrification, multiple architectures can be defined and each one should be evaluated during the first tradeoff studies. In this way, the systems design discipline should be integrated from the first design iterations. This paper deals with a progressive integration of the discipline to examine the partial or total effect of the systems design inside an MDA workflow. The study is carried out from a systems design perspective, analyzing the effect of electrification on aircraft design, with different MDA workflow arrangements. Starting from a non-iterative systems design, other disciplines such as aircraft performance, engine design, and aircraft synthesis are gradually added, increasing the sensibility of the aircraft design to the different systems architectures. The results show an error of 40% in on-board systems assessment when the discipline is not fully integrated. Finally, using the workflow which allows for greater integration, interesting differences can be noted when comparing systems with different levels of electrification. A possible mass saving of 2.6% of aircraft MTOM can be reached by properly selecting the systems technologies used.

Model-based systems engineering (MBSE) offers significant advantages over traditional document-based approaches, particularly in improving the clarity, traceability, and efficiency of requirements engineering (RE). However, MBSE also introduces challenges, particularly in maintaining consistent semantics and handling evolving system models. This paper presents ARMADE, an agile requirements management and definition environment developed at DLR, which aims to address these challenges. ARMADE enables the flexible, user-friendly modeling of system requirements using a data model that incorporates natural language patterns. The tool supports the dynamic adaptation of metamodels and facilitates collaborative, project-wide requirements management. A case study based on two systems of systems (SoS) from the EU-funded HE COLOSSUS project—firefighting and advanced aerial mobility (AAM)—demonstrates ARMADE’s ability to manage complex, interdisciplinary requirements. The study highlights the tool’s potential to reduce data inconsistencies, improve adaptability, and enhance the overall efficiency of the RE process. By enabling seamless updates and changes to requirements, ARMADE shows promise as a versatile solution for dynamic metamodeling in complex systems, with potential applications extending beyond aeronautics to various industries reliant on intricate requirements management.

In the last decades, several studies show how the concurrent evaluation of manufacturing and supply chain in the early design phase brings significant advantages to industries. In this frame, a value-driven methodology has been developed and applied in the aeronautical context to identify the best solution when considering design, manufacturing and supply chain criteria at the same time. This study aims at including optimization algorithms in the methodology to face a new challenge: the identification of solutions simultaneously optimizing manufacturing, design and supply chain variables. To achieve this objective, a collaborative multidisciplinary design optimization campaign is performed. The results show how enterprises can leverage the approach to perform several trade-off studies and take strategic decisions on the design and production of aeronautical systems.

Systems developed and operated by different stakeholders are increasingly interconnected. When multiple systems collaborate in a shared environment and together provide emerging functionalities, they are referred to as systems of systems. These types of systems can be further classified by their level of centralized management and decision-making, reflecting the distribution of responsibilities and ownership among enterprises. This paper introduces two systems of systems architecting processes tailored to different levels of centralized decision-making. These processes aim to define the architectural design space, which is characterized by both the operations of the constituent systems and the composition of the systems of systems across various levels.