Background and purpose: Mos scales currently used to evaluate spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) patients have only been validated in children. The aim of this study was to assess the construct validity and responsiveness of several outcome measures in adult SMA patients.Methods: Patients older than 15 years and followed up in five referral centres for at least 6 months, between October 2015 and August 2020, with a motor function scale score (Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded [HFMSE], Revised Upper Limb module [RULM]) were included. Bedside functional scales (Egen Klassification [EK2], Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale [ALSFRS‐R]) were also collected when available. Spearman's rho correlations (rs) and Bangdiwala's concordance test (B) were used to evaluate the scales' construct validity. Monthly slopes of change were used to calculate their responsiveness of the scales.Results: The study included 79 SMA patients, followed up for a mean of 16 months. All scales showed strong correlations with each other (rs > 0.70). A floor effect in motor function scales was found in the weakest patients (HFMSE < 5 and RULM < 10), and a ceiling effect was found in stronger patients (HFMSE > 60 and RULM > 35). The ALSFRS‐R (B = 0.72) showed a strong ability to discriminate between walkers, sitters and non‐sitters, and the HFMSE (B = 0.86) between walkers and sitters. The responsiveness was low overall, although in treated patients a moderate responsiveness was found for the ALSFRS‐R and HFMSE in walkers (0.69 and 0.61, respectively) and for EK2 in sitters (0.65) and non‐sitters (0.60).Conclusions: This study shows the validity and limitations of the scales most frequently used to assess adult SMA patients. Overall, bedside functional scales showed some advantages over motor scales, although all showed limited responsiveness.

Background and purpose: The aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of nusinersen in adult 5q spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) patients.Methods: Patients older than 15 years and followed for at least 6 months with one motor scale (Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded, HFMSE; Revised Upper Limb Module, RULM) in five referral centers were included. The clinical and patients' global impression of change (CGI‐C and PGI‐C) were recorded in treated patients at the last visit. Functional scales (Egen Klassification, EK2; Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale, ALSFRS‐R) and the percentage predicted forced vital capacity were collected when available.Results: Seventy‐nine SMA patients (39 treated with nusinersen) were included. Compared with untreated patients, treated patients showed a significant improvement of 2 points (±0.46) in RULM (p < 0.001) after 6 months. After a mean follow‐up of 16 months, nusinersen treatment was associated with a significant improvement in HFMSE (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, p = 0.006), the 6‐min walk test (OR = 1.07, p < 0.001) and the EK2 (OR = 0.81, p = 0.001). Compared with untreated patients, more treated patients experienced clinically meaningful improvements in all scales, but these differences were statistically significant only for RULM (p = 0.033), ALSFRS‐R (p = 0.005) and EK2 (p < 0.001). According to the CGI‐C and PGI‐C, 64.1% and 61.5% of treated patients improved with treatment. Being a non‐sitter was associated with less response to treatment, whilst a longer time of treatment was associated with better response. Most treated patients (77%) presented at least one adverse event, mostly mild.Conclusions: Nusinersen treatment is associated with some improvements in adult SMA patients. Most severely affected patients with complex spines are probably those with the most unfavorable risk–benefit ratio.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neurodegenerative disorder manifesting with progressive muscle weakness and atrophy. SMA type 1 used to be fatal within the first 2 years of life, but is now treatable with therapies targeting splicing modification and gene replacement. Nusinersen, risdiplam, and onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi improve survival, motor strength, endurance, and ability to thrive, allowing many patients to potentially attain a normal life; all have been recently approved by major regulatory agencies. Although these therapies have revolutionized the world of SMA, they are associated with a high economic burden, and access to these therapies is limited in some countries. The primary objective of this study was to compare the availability and implementation of treatment of SMA from different regions of the world. In this qualitative study, we surveyed health care providers from 21 countries regarding their experiences caring for patients with SMA. The main outcome measures were provider survey responses on newborn screening, drug availability/access, barriers to treatment, and related questions. Twenty-four providers from 21 countries with decades of experience (mean 26 years) in treating patients with SMA responded to the survey. Nusinersen was the most available therapy for SMA. Our survey showed that while genetic testing is usually available, newborn screening is still unavailable in many countries. The provider-reported treatment cost also varied between countries, and economic burden was a major barrier in treating patients with SMA. Overall, this survey highlights the global inequality in managing patients with SMA. The spread of newborn screening is essential in ensuring improved access to care for patients with SMA. With the advancement of neurotherapeutics, more genetic diseases will soon be treatable, and addressing the global inequality in clinical care will require novel approaches to mitigate such inequality in the future.

Objective: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) exon 45–55 deletion (del45–55) has been postulated as a model that could treat up to 60% of DMD patients, but the associated clinical variability and complications require clarification. We aimed to understand the phenotypes and potential modifying factors of this dystrophinopathy subset.Methods: This cross‐sectional, multicenter cohort study applied clinical and functional evaluation. Next generation sequencing was employed to identify intronic breakpoints and their impact on the Dp140 promotor, intronic long noncoding RNA, and regulatory splicing sequences. DMD modifiers (SPP1, LTBP4, ACTN3) and concomitant mutations were also assessed. Haplotypes were built using DMD single nucleotide polymorphisms. Dystrophin expression was evaluated via immunostaining, Western blotting, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and droplet digital PCR in 9 muscle biopsies.Results: The series comprised 57 subjects (23 index) expressing Becker phenotype (28%), isolated cardiopathy (19%), and asymptomatic features (53%). Cognitive impairment occurred in 90% of children. Patients were classified according to 10 distinct index‐case breakpoints; 4 of them were recurrent due to founder events. A specific breakpoint (D5) was associated with severity, but no significant effect was appreciated due to the changes in intronic sequences. All biopsies showed dystrophin expression of >67% and traces of alternative del45–57 transcript that were not deemed pathogenically relevant. Only the LTBP4 haplotype appeared associated the presence of cardiopathy among the explored extragenic factors.Interpretation: We confirmed that del45–55 segregates a high proportion of benign phenotypes, severe cases, and isolated cardiac and cognitive presentations. Although some influence of the intronic breakpoint position and the LTBP4 modifier may exist, the pathomechanisms responsible for the phenotypic variability remain largely unresolved. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:793–806