Paroxetine (PX) is a widely used antidepressant with side effects such as weakness, dizziness, and trouble sleeping. In search of novel compounds with better efficacy and fewer side effects, we synthesized 3HPX, a hydroxylated analog of PX, and compared the 2 in silico for their pharmacokinetic and binding properties and in vivo for their antidepressant and potential neuroprotective effects. In silico studies compared pharmacological properties as well as interactions of PX and 3HPX with the serotonin transporter. In vivo studies utilized an animal model of comorbid depression-Parkinson disease. Adult male Wistar rats were injected (sterotaxically) with lipopolysaccharide in the striatum (unilaterally), followed by 14 days of once-daily injections (i.p.) of 10 mg/kg PX or 3HPX. Animals were tested for motor asymmetry and locomotor activity as well as indices of anhedonia and helplessness using sucrose preference and forced swim tests, respectively. Brains of these animals were collected after the last test, and tyrosine hydroxylase–positive neurons in substantia nigra pars compacta and Iba-1–positive stained microglia in ipsilateral striatum were measured. In silico findings indicated that 3HPX could bind stronger to serotonin transporter and also have a better clearance and hence less toxicity compared with PX. In vivo results revealed a more effective reversal of immobility in the swim test, substantial increase in tyrosine hydroxylase–positive cells in the substantia nigra pars compacta, and more ramified Iba-1⁺ cells by 3HPX compared with PX. The findings suggest superior effectiveness of 3HPX as an antidepressant and neuroprotectant compared with PX and hence potential utility in Parkinson disease depression co-morbidity.

It is well established that the gut-brain axis (GBA) is a bidirectional communication between the gut and the brain. This axis, critical in maintaining overall homeostasis, is regulated at the neuronal, endocrine, and immunological levels, all of which may be influenced by the gut microbiota (GM). Therefore, dysbiosis or disruption in the GM may have serious consequences including neuroinflammation due to overactivation of the immune system. Strategies to reestablish GM integrity via use of probiotics are being pursued as novel therapeutic intervention in a variety of central and peripheral diseases. The mechanisms leading to dysbiosis or efficacy of probiotics, however, are not fully evident. Here, we performed computational analysis on two major probiotics, namely Lactobacillus Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (formerly named Lactobacillus rhamnosus, L. rhamnosus GG) and Bifidobacterium animalis spp. lactis (B. lactis or B. animalis) to not only shed some light on their mechanism(s) of action but also to identify potential molecular targets for novel probiotics. Using the PubMed web page and BioCyc Database Collection platform we specifically analyzed proteins affected by metabolites of these bacteria. Our results indicate that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), nuclear receptor proteins that are involved in regulation of inflammation are key mediators of the neuroactive effect of probiotics.