BACKGROUND: The RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI (Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravascular Imaging Guidance Versus Angiography-Guidance on Clinical Outcomes After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) demonstrated that intravascular imaging–guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improved clinical outcome compared with angiography-guided PCI for patients with complex coronary artery lesions. This study aims to assess whether the prognostic benefit of intravascular imaging–guided procedural optimization persists in patients undergoing PCI for left main coronary artery disease. METHODS: Of 1639 patients enrolled in the RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI, 192 patients with left main coronary artery disease were selected for the current prespecified substudy. Selected patients were randomly assigned to either the intravascular imaging–guided PCI group (n=138) or the angiography-guided PCI group (n=54). The primary end point was target vessel failure defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel–related myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 2.1 years (interquartile range 1.1 to 3.0 years), intravascular imaging–guided PCI was associated with lower incidence of primary end point compared with angiography-guided PCI (6.8% versus 25.1%; hazard ratio, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.13–0.76]; P =0.010). This significant reduction in primary end point was mainly driven by a lower risk of cardiac death or spontaneous target vessel–related myocardial infarction (1.6% versus 12.7%; hazard ratio, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.03–0.82]; P =0.028). Intravascular imaging–guided PCI was independently associated with a lower risk of primary end point, even after adjusting for various clinical factors (hazard ratio, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.12–0.72]; P =0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular imaging–guided PCI showed clinical benefit over angiography-guided PCI for left main coronary artery disease in reducing the risk of cardiac death, target vessel–related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03381872.

BACKGROUND: Although clinical benefits of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with complex coronary artery lesions have been observed in previous trials, the cost-effectiveness of this strategy is uncertain. METHODS: RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI (Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravascular Imaging Guidance vs Angiography-Guidance on Clinical Outcomes After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) was conducted in Korea between May 2018 and May 2021. This prespecified cost-effectiveness substudy was conducted using Markov model that simulated 3 states: (1) post-PCI, (2) spontaneous myocardial infarction, and (3) death. A simulated cohort was derived from the intention-to-treat population, and input parameters were extracted from either the trial data or previous publications. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated using time horizon of 3 years (within trial) and lifetime. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), an indicator of incremental cost on additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, in intravascular imaging-guided PCI compared with angiography-guided PCI. The current analysis was performed using the Korean health care sector perspective with reporting the results in US dollar (1200 Korean Won, ₩=1 dollar, $). Willingness to pay threshold was $35 000 per QALY gained. RESULTS: A total of 1639 patients were included in the trial. During 3-year follow-up, medical costs ($8661 versus $7236; incremental cost, $1426) and QALY (2.34 versus 2.31; incremental QALY, 0.025) were both higher in intravascular imaging-guided PCI than angiography-guided PCI, resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $57 040 per QALY gained within trial data. Conversely, lifetime simulation showed total cumulative medical cost was reversed between the 2 groups ($40 455 versus $49 519; incremental cost, −$9063) with consistently higher QALY (8.24 versus 7.89; incremental QALY, 0.910) in intravascular imaging-guided PCI than angiography-guided PCI, resulting in a dominant incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Consistently, 70% of probabilistic iterations showed cost-effectiveness of intravascular imaging-guided PCI in probabilistic sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The current cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that imaging-guided PCI is more cost-effective than angiography-guided PCI by reducing medical cost and increasing quality-of-life in complex coronary artery lesions in long-term follow-up. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03381872.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been the most dangerous threat to public health worldwide for the last few years, which led to the development of the novel mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2). However, BNT162b2 vaccination is known to be associated with myocarditis. Here, as an attempt to determine the pathogenesis of the disease and to develop biomarkers to determine whether subjects likely proceed to myocarditis after vaccination, we conducted a time series analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells of a patient with BNT162b2-induced myocarditis. Single-cell RNA sequence analysis identified monocytes as the cell clusters with the most dynamic changes. To identify distinct gene expression signatures, we compared monocytes of BNT162b2-induced myocarditis with monocytes under various conditions, including SARS-CoV-2 infection, BNT162b2 vaccination, and Kawasaki disease, a disease similar to myocarditis. Representative changes in the transcriptomic profile of classical monocytes include the upregulation of genes related to fatty acid metabolism and downregulation of transcription factor AP-1 activity. This study provides, for the first time, the importance of classical monocytes in the pathogenesis of myocarditis following BNT162b2 vaccination and presents the possibility that vaccination affects monocytes, further inducing their differentiation and infiltration into the heart.

Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is a noninvasive method to evaluate vascular endothelial function, which manifests the vascular inflammatory response, cell proliferation, and autoregulation. Since FMD is noninvasive and assesses commonly in the brachial artery by ultrasound, compared to other invasive methods such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), it is widely used to evaluate endothelial function and allows serial assessment. In this review, we present the currently accepted mechanisms and methods of FMD measurement with the studies applied in the current clinical practice using FMD. After all, the association with cardiovascular diseases is of substance, and so we introduce clinical studies of FMD related to cardiovascular disease such as diabetes, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, and peripheral vascular disease. In addition, studies related to pregnancy and COVID-19 were also inspected. Yet, endothelial examination is not endorsed as a cardiovascular prevention measure, for the lack of a clear standardized value methodology. Still, many studies recommend practicable FMD and would be a better prognostic value in the cardiovascular prognosis in future clinical research.

Myocardial ischemia–reperfusion (I/R) injury remains a major contributor to infarct expansion and adverse cardiac remodeling despite advances in timely reperfusion therapy. Although restoration of blood flow is essential for myocardial salvage, the abrupt transition from ischemia to reperfusion paradoxically exacerbates cardiomyocyte injury through profound metabolic, ionic, and mitochondrial disturbances. Reperfusion should be viewed not simply as restoration of blood flow, but as a critical biological transition that converts ischemic stress into a self-amplifying injury network. Reperfusion induces excessive reactive oxygen species generation, calcium overload, endothelial barrier disruption, and dysregulated innate immune activation, which converge on mitochondrial dysfunction and diverse forms of cell death, including apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis. Emerging evidence highlights that these pathological processes are tightly interconnected through damage-associated molecular pattern signaling, microvascular leakage, and inflammatory amplification, underscoring the limitations of single-target therapeutic approaches. This review summarizes the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying myocardial I/R injury with a particular focus on oxidative stress, immune modulation, vascular integrity, and ferroptosis. We further discuss current and emerging cardioprotective strategies, including antioxidant therapies, modulation of neutrophil recruitment, microvascular leakage blockade, and anti-ferroptotic interventions. Finally, we address key translational challenges and future perspectives for developing integrated cardioprotective therapies aimed at improving clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction.