Background: Allograft urolithiasis is an uncommon, challenging, and potentially dangerous clinical problem. Treatment of allograft stones includes external shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), flexible ureteroscopy and lasertripsy (fURSL), or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). A gap in the literature and guidelines exists regarding the treatment of patients in this setting. The aim of this systematic review was to collect preoperative and treatment characteristics and evaluate the outcomes of post-transplant SWL for stone disease. Methods: A systematic search in the literature was performed, including articles up to March 2023. Only original English articles were selected. Results: Eight articles (81 patients) were included in the review. Patients were mainly male, with a mean age of 41.9 years (±7.07). The mean stone size was 13.18 mm (±2.28 mm). Stones were predominantly located in the kidney (n = 18, 62%). The overall stone-free rate and complication rates were 81% (range: 50–100%) and 17.2% (14/81), respectively, with only one major complication reported. A pre-operative drainage was placed in eleven (13.5%) patients. Five patients (6.71%) required a second treatment for residual fragments. Conclusions: SWL is a safe and effective option to treat de novo stones after transplantation. Larger studies are needed to better address allograft urolithiasis management.

Introduction and Objective: Renal transplantation is the treatment for end-stage renal disease that offers better quality of life and survival. Among the possible complications that might affect allografts, urolithiasis might have severe consequences, causing acute kidney injury (AKI) or septic events in immunocompromised patients. Allograft stones might be treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The aim of this Cochrane style review was to assess the safety and efficacy of PCNL in patients with renal transplant. Methods: A comprehensive search in the literature was performed including articles between July 1982 and June 2023, with only English original articles selected for this review. Results: The final review encompassed nine articles (108 patients). The mean age was 46.4 ± 8.7 years, with a male:female ratio of 54:44. The average time from transplantation to urolithiasis onset was 47.54 ± 23.9 months. Predominant symptoms upon presentation were AKI (32.3%), followed by urinary tract infection and fever (24.2%), and oliguria (12.9%). The mean stone size was 20.1 ± 7.3 mm, with stones located in the calices or pelvis (41%), ureteropelvic junction (23.1%), or proximal ureter (28.2%). PCNL (22F–30F) was more frequently performed than mini-PCNLs (16F–20F) (52.4% vs 47.6%). Puncture was guided by ultrasound (42.9%), fluoroscopy (14.3%), or both (42.9%). The stone-free rate (SFR) and complication rates were 92.95% (range: 77%–100%) and 5.5%, respectively, with only one major complication reported. Postoperatively, a ureteral stent and nephrostomy were commonly placed in 47%, with four patients needing a second look PCNL. During an average follow-up of 32.5 months, the recurrence rate was 3.7% (4/108), and the mean creatinine level was 1.37 ± 0.28 mg/dL. Conclusions: PCNL remains a safe and effective option in de novo allograft urolithiasis, allowing to treat large stones in one-step surgery. A good SFR is achieved with a low risk of minor complications. These patients should be treated in an endourology center in conjunction with the renal or transplant team.

Background and Objectives: We sought to investigate whether the 2012 Briganti nomogram may represent a potential prognostic factor of prostate cancer (PCa) progression after surgical treatment beyond European Association of Urology (EAU) risk categories. Materials and Methods: From January 2013 to December 2021, data on PCa patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at a single tertiary referral center were extracted. The 2012 version of the Briganti nomogram assessing the risk of pelvic lymph node invasion was used. Here, the nomogram score was evaluated both as a continuous and a categorical variable. The association between variables and disease progression after surgery was evaluated through Cox regression models. Results: Overall, 1047 patients were identified. According to the EAU classification system, 297 (28.4%) patients were low-risk, 527 (50.3%) intermediate-risk, and 223 (21.3%) high-risk. The median (interquartile range) 2012 Briganti nomogram score within the investigated population was 3% (2–8%). Median (95% Confidence Interval [CI]) follow-up was 95 (91.9–112.4) months. Disease progression occurred in 237 (22.6%) patients, who were more likely to have an increasing 2012 Briganti nomogram score (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 1.03; 95%CI: 1.01–1.81; p = 0.015), independently of unfavorable issues at clinical presentation. Moreover, the nomogram score stratified according to tertiles (<3% vs. 3–8% vs. ≥8%) hold significance beyond EAU risk categories: accordingly, the risk of disease progression increased as the score increased from the first (reference) to the second (HR: 1.50; 95%CI: 1.67–3.72; p < 0.001) up to the third (HR: 3.26; 95%CI: 2.26–4.72; p < 0.001) tertile. Conclusions: Beyond EAU risk categories, the 2012 Briganti nomogram represented an independent predictor of PCa progression after surgery. Likewise, as the nomogram score increased so patients were more likely to experience disease progression. Accordingly, it may allow further stratification of patients within each risk category to modulate appropriate treatment paradigms.

Objective: to evaluate predictors and the prognostic impact of favorable vs. unfavorable tumor upgrading among low-risk prostate cancer (LR PCa) patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods: From January 2013 to October 2020, LR PCa patients treated with RARP at our institution were identified. Unfavorable tumor upgrading was defined as the presence of an International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group at final pathology > 2. Disease relapse was coded as biochemical recurrence and/or local recurrence and/or presence of distant metastases. Regression analyses tested the association between clinical and pathological features and the risk of unfavorable tumor upgrading and disease relapse. Results: Of the 237 total LR PCa patients, 60 (25.3%) harbored unfavorable tumor upgrading. Disease relapse occurred in 20 (8.4%) patients. Unfavorable upgrading represented an independent predictor of disease relapse, even after adjustment for other clinical and pathological variables. Conversely, favorable tumor upgrading did not show any statistically significant association with PCa relapse. Unfavorable tumor upgrading was associated with tumors being larger (OR: 1.03; p = 0.031), tumors extending beyond the gland (OR: 8.54, p < 0.001), age (OR: 1.07, p = 0.009), and PSA density (PSAD) ≥ 0.15 ng/mL/cc (OR: 1.07, p = 0.009). Conclusions: LR PCa patients with unfavorable upgrading at final pathology were more likely to be older, to have PSAD ≥ 0.15 ng/mL/cc, and to experience disease relapse. Unfavorable tumor upgrading is an issue to consider when counseling these patients to avoid delayed treatments, which may impair cancer-specific survival.

Objectives To evaluate the index density (Id) of the percentage of biopsy positive cores (BPC), Id-BPC, as a prognostic factor of prostate cancer (PCa) progression after predicting unfavorable pathology in patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) eventually associated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Design Data from 1047 patients undergoing RARP were collected between January 2013 and December 2021. Methods Id-BPC was defined as the ratio of BPC (%) to prostate volume (mL). Unfavorable pathology in the surgical specimen was defined as tumor grade group greater than 1 and/or non-organ confined disease. Disease progression was defined as biochemical recurrence and/or loco-regional recurrence and/or metastatic occurrence. Associations with the risk of unfavorable pathology and disease progression were evaluated by logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards model (univariate and multivariate analysis), respectively. Results Unfavorable pathology was detected in 930 (88.8%) cases. Disease progression occurred in 160 (15.3%) patients after a mean (95% CI) follow-up of 89.0 (86.6-91.3) months. After adjusting for all clinical variables, patients with higher Id-BCR were more likely to have unfavorable pathology in the surgical specimen (odds ratio = 1.566; 95% CI: 1.029 – 2.383; p < 0.001). As Id-BCR increased, patients were more likely to experience disease progression, even when adjusting for clinical variables (hazard ratio = 1.587; 95% CI: 1.306 – 1.929; p < 0.0001), as well as unfavorable pathology (hazard ratio = 1.365; 95% CI: 1.166 – 1.597; p < 0.0001). The impact of Id-BPC on PCa progression was stronger than that of BPC, particularly after predicting unfavorable pathology. Conclusions Id-BCR is an independent prognostic factor of unfavorable pathology and disease progression in PCa patients undergoing surgical treatment with curative intent. As Id-BPC increases, patients have a higher probability of experiencing unfavorable pathology in the surgical specimen and disease progression. Id-BCR is a clinical marker of PCa biology.