Activity-based therapy (ABT) is a therapeutic approach with multiple benefits including promoting neurorecovery and reducing the likelihood of secondary complications in people living with spinal cord injury (SCI). Barriers and facilitators to ABT implementation for SCI rehabilitation have been studied from various perspectives through qualitative research. However, these viewpoints have not been synthesized to identify challenges of and strategies for implementing ABT across the Canadian healthcare system. Thus, the purpose of our study was to examine the current state of ABT in Canadian healthcare settings according to users’ perspectives. Our main objectives were to compare barriers and facilitators to ABT implementation across Canadian healthcare settings according to users’ perspectives and to identify optimal intervention strategies for ABT delivery across the Canadian healthcare system from acute to community care. We searched Scopus, CINAHL, OvidMedline, and other sources. Eligible articles were qualitative or mixed methods studies exploring ABT for adults with SCI in a Canadian healthcare setting. We analyzed qualitative findings through a thematic synthesis followed by a deductive content analysis. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for critical appraisal. Nine articles were included. The thematic synthesis revealed two main themes: (1) factors influencing acceptance and adaptation of ABT across healthcare settings in Canada and (2) proposed solutions. The deductive analysis applied the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) to identify limited components of behaviour and appropriate interventions. To address ABT implementation challenges across the Canadian healthcare system, evidence-based interventions should target BCW subcategories of reflective motivation, social opportunity, and physical opportunity.

Objective: The Standing and Walking Assessment Tool (SWAT) standardizes the timing and content of walking assessments during inpatient rehabilitation by combining 12 stages ranging from lowest to highest function (0, 0.5, 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, 2C, 3A, 3B, 3C, and 4) with 5 standard measures: the Berg Balance Scale, the modified Timed “Up & Go” test, the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, the modified 6-Minute Walk Test, and the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT). This study aimed to determine if the SWAT at rehabilitation discharge could predict outdoor walking capacity 1-year after discharge in people with traumatic spinal cord injury. Methods: This retrospective study used data obtained from the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry from 2014 to 2020. Community outdoor walking capacity was measured using the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) outdoor mobility score obtained 12 (±4) months after discharge. Of 206 study participants, 90 were community nonwalkers (ie, SCIM III score 0–3), 41 were community walkers with aids (ie, SCIM III score 4–6), and 75 were independent community walkers (ie, SCIM III score 7–8). Bivariate, multivariable regression, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed. Results: At rehabilitation discharge, 3 significant SWAT associations were confirmed: 0–3A with community nonwalkers, 3B/higher with community walkers with and without an aid, and 4 with independent community walkers. Moreover, at discharge, a higher (Berg Balance Scale, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale), faster (modified Timed “Up & Go,” 10MWT), or further (10MWT) SWAT measure was significantly associated with independent community walking. Multivariable analysis indicated that all SWAT measures, except the 10MWT were significant predictors of independent community walking. Furthermore, the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic score (0.91), demonstrating an excellent ability to distinguish community walkers with aids from independent community walkers. Conclusion: The SWAT stage and measures at discharge can predict community outdoor walking capacity in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury. Notably, a patient’s confidence in performing activities plays an important part in achieving walking ability in the community. Impact: The discharge SWAT is useful to optimize discharge planning.

Objectives: To describe the performance of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) examination in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) and nontraumatic spinal cord injury (NTSCI) across Canadian acute and rehabilitation facilities, evaluating timing, completeness, and classification accuracy. Methods: Using the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (2015-2022), participants were analyzed across 6 cohorts: (A) TSCI-acute-admission ( n = 4461), (B) TSCI-acute-discharge ( n = 972), (C) TSCI-rehabilitation-admission ( n = 2673), (D) TSCI-rehabilitation-discharge (n = 2316), (E) NTSCI-rehabilitation-admission ( n = 728), and (F) NTSCI-rehabilitation-discharge (n = 619). ISNCSCI data included performed (yes/no), timing (≤72 hours, ≤7 days, and >7 days of admission/discharge), completeness, missing items, and worksheet used (yes/no). Classification accuracy between the clinician-determined and algorithm-generated ASIA Impairment Scale and neurological level of injury classification was evaluated. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were used to analyze cohorts. Results: Overall, 70% of participants had at least one examination performed, with 76% performed ≤72 hours, 91% ≤7 days, and 9% >7 days. However, 45% were partially complete, primarily missing sensory scores and rectal components ≤7 days. Comparison of TSCI and NTSCI during rehabilitation showed that NTSCI cohorts had significantly more exams at admission and fewer at discharge, with more complete exams. Moreover, age at injury, injury type, mechanism, severity, length of stay, and pain influenced examination performance. Conclusion: This study highlights the need for greater consistency in ISNCSCI examination performance and identifies patient-level barriers to completion. Determining the most effective standardized approach for ISNCSCI use across SCI care, addressing modifiable human/organizational factors, and ensuring comprehensive clinical training will improve the quality of this assessment.