The implementation of barbed sutures appears to enhance the process of suturing and knot tying, particularly in the field of bariatric surgery, where they can offer significant advantages. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of utilising barbed sutures for gastric pouch-jejunal anastomosis (GPJA) and jejuno-jejunal anastomosis (JJA) anastomosis in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB). Data from patients who underwent primary RYGB between January 2012 and October 2018 were retrospectively collected using Propensity Score Matching (PSM) to randomise groups (barbed sutures—BS-G and conventional sutures—CS-G). The primary outcome was postoperative early complications. The secondary outcomes were late complications (internal hernias and small bowel obstructions), operative time and postoperative hospital stay. A total of 969 patients were included. After PSM, 322 (161 in BS-G vs. 161 in CS-G) patients were compared (chi-square 0.287, p = 0.862). Postoperative early and late complications were comparable between the two groups. BS-G had a significantly shorter median operative time (65 vs. 95 min p < 0.001). Median postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter for BS-G (2 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001). Barbed sutures effectively reduce the operation duration and are as safe as conventional sutures for closing anastomotic defects during RYGB.

Focused parathyroidectomy is the preferred surgical method for treating primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) sustained by the pre-operatively well-localized parathyroid adenoma. We aimed to compare the effectiveness, safety, and short-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) in locoregional anaesthesia (LA) vs. general anaesthesia (GA) by means of propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Retrospective research of patients who underwent MIVAP between January 2014 and December 2022 was carried out. Patients were divided into two groups based on the anaesthesiologic procedure (LA vs. GA). Overall, 553 patients underwent MIVAP. After PSM, 115 patients in the LA group and 230 patients in the GA group were included. MIVAP under LA was associated with shorter median operative time (16 vs. 35 min, p < 0.001), shorter median operative room occupation time (44 vs. 73 min, p < 0.001), and lesser median post-operative visual analogue scale pain, with comparable post-operative hospital stay and complication rate. MIVAP under LA is a safe and feasible procedure with significant advantages over GA in terms of post-operative pain and operative room occupation time. This last step can finally result in more efficient utilisation of the operative room and the health care system’s resources.

After its first publication in 1997, minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) has been developed and standardized and received wide acceptance in the surgical community. Several comparative studies demonstrated the safety of the technique, which provides a complete surgical resection with similar complication rates to its conventional counterpart. Besides the improved aesthetic result, MIVAT showed several advantages in terms of postoperative pain and postoperative outcome. Indeed, the magnification of the endoscope enhances the identification of the critical neck structures allowing minimization of the incision length and extent of dissection. An accurate patient selection plays a key role in ensuring the success of MIVAT. In this chapter we focus on the surgical technique, the indications and the main outcomes of MIVAT. Keywords Thyroidectomy Minimally invasive thyroidectomy Postoperative complications Postoperative outcome Oncologic outcome