Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a complex and progressive neurodegenerative disorder. The available therapy is limited to the symptomatic treatment and its efficacy remains unsatisfactory. In view of the prevalence and expected increase in the incidence of AD, the development of an effective therapy is crucial for public health. Due to the multifactorial aetiology of this disease, the multi-target-directed ligand (MTDL) approach is a promising method in search for new drugs for AD. This review updates information on the development of multifunctional potential anti-AD agents published within the last three years. The majority of the recently reported structures are acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, often endowed with some additional properties. These properties enrich the pharmacological profile of the compounds giving hope for not only symptomatic but also causal treatment of the disease. Among these advantageous properties, the most often reported are an amyloid-β antiaggregation activity, inhibition of β-secretase and monoamine oxidase, an antioxidant and metal chelating activity, NOreleasing ability and interaction with cannabinoid, NMDA or histamine H₃ receptors. The majority of novel molecules possess heterodimeric structures, able to interact with multiple targets by combining different pharmacophores, original or derived from natural products or existing therapeutics (tacrine, donepezil, galantamine, memantine). Among the described compounds, several seem to be promising drug candidates, while others may serve as a valuable inspiration in the search for new effective therapies for AD.

Cholinesterases are important biological targets responsible for regulation of cholinergic transmission, and their inhibitors are used for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. To design new cholinesterase inhibitors, of different structure-based design strategies was followed, including the modification of compounds from a previously developed library and a fragment-based design approach. This led to the selection of heterodimeric structures as potential inhibitors. Synthesis and biological evaluation of selected candidates confirmed that the designed compounds were acetylcholinesterase inhibitors with IC₅₀ values in the mid-nanomolar to low micromolar range, and some of them were also butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors.

The search for antiepileptic compounds with more selective activity and lower toxicity continues to be an area of intensive investigation in medicinal chemistry. This review describes new anticonvulsant agents representing various structures for which the precise mechanism of action is still not known. Many of the compounds presented in this review have been tested according to the procedure established by the Antiepileptic Drug Development Program of the Epilepsy Branch of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute of Health, USA. The newer agents include sulfonamides, amino acids, amides (analogs of γ-vinyl GABA, N-benzylamides, 2,6-dimethylanilides, carboxyamides, hydroxyamides, alkanoamides); heterocyclic agents ((arylalkyl)imidazoles, pyrrolidin-2,5-diones, lactams, semi- thiosemicarbazones, thiadiazoles, quinazolin-4(3H)-ones, 2,5-disubstituted 1,2,4-thadiazoles, xanthones, derivatives of isatin) and enaminones. These new structural classes of compounds can prove useful for the design of future targets and development of new drugs.

In Alzheimer’s disease, neurons slowly degenerate due to the accumulation of misfolded amyloid β and tau proteins. In our research, we performed extended studies directed at amyloid β and tau aggregation inhibition using in cellulo (Escherichia coli model of protein aggregation), in silico, and in vitro kinetic studies. We tested our library of 1-benzylamino-2-hydroxyalkyl multifunctional anti-Alzheimer’s agents and identified very potent dual aggregation inhibitors. Among the tested derivatives, we selected compound 18, which exhibited a unique profile of biological activity. This compound was the most potent and balanced dual aggregation inhibitor (Aβ₄₂ inhibition (inh.) 80.0%, tau inh. 68.3% in 10 μM), with previously reported in vitro inhibitory activity against hBuChE, hBACE1, and Aβ (hBuChE IC₅₀ = 5.74 μM; hBACE1 IC₅₀ = 41.6 μM; Aβ aggregation (aggr.) inh. IC₅₀ = 3.09 μM). In docking studies for both proteins, we tried to explain the different structural requirements for the inhibition of Aβ vs tau. Moreover, docking and kinetic studies showed that compound 18 could inhibit the amyloid aggregation process at several steps and also displayed disaggregating properties. These results may help to design the next generations of dual or selective aggregation inhibitors.