Veerachai Tanpipat

Dr. Veerachai Tanpipat


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 October 2025 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBEnikoe Bihari
Enikoe Bihari
KDKaren Dyson
Karen Dyson
KJKayla Johnston
Kayla Johnston
DTDaniel Marc dela Torre
Daniel Marc dela Torre
ACAkkarapon Chaiyana
Akkarapon Chaiyana
DSDavid Saah
David Saah
Seasonal fires in northern Thailand are a persistent environmental and public health concern, yet existing fire probability mapping approaches in Thailand rely heavily on subjective multi-criteria analysis (MCA) methods and temporally static data aggregation methods. To address these limitations, we present a flexible, replicable, and operationally viable seasonal fire probability mapping methodology using a Random Forest (RF) machine learning model in the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform. We trained the model on historical fire occurrence and fire predictor layers from 2016–2023 and applied it to 2024 conditions to generate a probabilistic fire prediction. Our novel approach improves upon existing operational methods and scientific literature in several ways. It uses a more representative sample design which is agnostic to the burn history of fire presences and absences, pairs fire and fire predictor data from each year to account for interannual variation in conditions, empirically refines the most influential fire predictors from a comprehensive set of predictors, and provides a reproducible and accessible framework using GEE. Predictor variables include both socioeconomic and environmental drivers of fire, such as topography, fuels, potential fire behavior, forest type, vegetation characteristics, climate, water availability, crop type, recent burn history, and human influence and accessibility. The model achieves an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.841 when applied to 2016–2023 data and 0.848 when applied to 2024 data, indicating strong discriminatory power despite the additional spatial and temporal variability introduced by our sample design. The highest fire probabilities emerge in forested and agricultural areas at mid elevations and near human settlements and roads, which aligns well with the known anthropogenic drivers of fire in Thailand. Distinct areas of model uncertainty are also apparent in cropland and forests which are only burned intermittently, highlighting the importance of accounting for localized burning cycles. Variable importance analysis using the Gini Impurity Index identifies both natural and anthropogenic predictors as key and nearly equally important predictors of fire, including certain forest and crop types, vegetation characteristics, topography, climate, human influence and accessibility, water availability, and recent burn history. Our findings demonstrate the heavy influence of data preprocessing and model design choices on model results. The model outputs are provided as interpretable probability maps and the methods can be adapted to future years or augmented with local datasets. Our methodology presents a scalable advancement in wildfire probability mapping with machine learning and open-source tools, particularly for data-constrained landscapes. It will support Thailand’s fire managers in proactive fire response and planning and also inform broader regional fire risk assessment efforts.

1 January 2012
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
SCSteve Chien
Steve Chien
Veerachai TanpipatVeerachai Tanpipat
Veerachai Tanpipat

24 July 2025 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
EBEnikoe Bihari
Enikoe Bihari
KDKaren Dyson
Karen Dyson
KJKayla Johnston
Kayla Johnston
DTDaniel Marc dela Torre
Daniel Marc dela Torre
ACAkkarapon Chaiyana
Akkarapon Chaiyana
DSDavid Saah
David Saah
Seasonal fires in northern Thailand are a persistent environmental and public health concern, yet existing fire probability mapping approaches in Thailand rely heavily on subjective multi-criteria analysis (MCA) methods and temporally static data aggregation methods. To address these limitations, we present a flexible, replicable, and operationally viable seasonal fire probability mapping methodology using a Random Forest (RF) machine learning model in the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform. We trained the model on historical fire occurrence and fire predictor layers from 2016-2023, and applied it to 2024 conditions to generate a probabilistic fire prediction. Our novel approach uses a more representative sample design which is agnostic to the burn history of fire presences and absences, pairs fire and fire predictor data from each year to account for interannual variation in conditions, empirically refines the most influential fire predictors from a comprehensive set of predictors, and provides a reproducible and accessible framework using GEE. Predictor variables include both socioeconomic and environmental predictors of fire, such as topography, fuels, potential fire behavior, forest type, vegetation characteristics, climate, water availability, crop type, recent burn history, and human influence and accessibility. The model achieved an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.841 when applied to 2016-2023 data and 0.848 when applied to 2024 data, indicating strong discriminatory power. The highest fire probabilities emerged in forested and agricultural areas at mid elevations and near human settlements and roads, which aligns with the known anthropogenic drivers of fire Thailand. Variable importance analysis using the Gini Impurity Index identified both natural and anthropogenic predictors as key drivers of fire, including certain forest and crop types, vegetation characteristics, topography, climate, human influence and accessibility, water availability, and recent burn history. Our findings demonstrate the influence of model design choices on model results. The model outputs are provided as interpretable probability maps and the methods can be adapted to future years or augmented with local datasets. Our methodology presents a scalable advancement in wildfire probability mapping with machine learning and open-source tools, particularly for data-constrained landscapes. It can support Thailand’s fire managers in proactive fire response and planning, and also inform broader regional fire risk assessment efforts.

1 December 2012
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
SCSteve Chien
Steve Chien
Veerachai TanpipatVeerachai Tanpipat
Veerachai Tanpipat

30 December 2024 in Journal of Tropical Silviculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Veerachai TanpipatVeerachai Tanpipat
Veerachai Tanpipat
RRRoyboon Rassameethes
Royboon Rassameethes
JCJittiporn Chantarojsiri
Jittiporn Chantarojsiri
PDPakarat Danusatianpong
Pakarat Danusatianpong
SPSarawadee Phattharakijkulthorn
Sarawadee Phattharakijkulthorn
SWSutat Weesakul
Sutat Weesakul
Community-based Water Management (CBWM) in Thailand is fundamentally grounded in the Sufficiency Economy Philosophy (SEP), a concept introduced by King Rama IX in 1974. This approach highlights the importance of self-reliance, active community participation, and the development of locally adapted solutions to foster disaster resilience and promote environmental sustainability. Community-based Fire and Water Management (CBFWM) represents an integrated strategy designed to address environmental challenges, particularly wildland fires and smoke haze, which are prevalent in the Upper ASEAN region, specifically within the Lower Mekong River Basin. By combining water and fire management, this holistic approach not only strengthens community resilience to climate change but also enhances local livelihoods in a sustainable manner. Given that social issues often serve as the primary drivers of wildland fires, this approach provides strategies focused on building community capacity to independently maintain ecosystem sustainability while addressing economic and environmental challenges. Keywords: Community-based, Sufficiency Economy Philosophy (SEP), holistic approach, Upper ASEAN.