The rapid integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence in higher education challenges social work as student adoption outpaces pedagogical guidance. This paper argues that the unguided use of AI fosters cognitive debt: a cumulative deficit in critical thinking, ethical reasoning, and professional judgment that arises from offloading cognitive tasks. To counter this risk, a pedagogical model is proposed, synthesizing experiential learning, andragogy, and critical pedagogies. The framework reframes AI from a passive information tool into an active object of critical inquiry. Through structured assignments across micro, mezzo, and macro practice, the model guides students through cycles of concrete experience with AI, reflective observation of its biases, abstract conceptualization of ethical principles, and active experimentation with responsible professional use. Aligned with professional ethical standards, the model aims to prepare future social workers to scrutinize and shape AI as a tool for social justice. The paper concludes with implications for faculty development, institutional policy, accreditation, and a forward-looking research agenda.

This study investigated thwarted belongingness as a moderator of the relationship between microaggressions and mental health among LGBTQ+ emerging adults. Using data collected from 186 LGBTQ+ emerging adults, we conducted separate moderation analyses to examine whether, and to what extent, the relation between microaggressions and mental health (i.e. anxiety and depressive symptoms) is moderated by thwarted belongingness. Interpersonal and environmental microaggressions were associated with anxiety and depressive symptoms. Results of the moderation models suggest that the effects of interpersonal and environmental microaggressions on anxiety symptoms were moderated by thwarted belongingness, and that relations between interpersonal and environmental microaggressions and anxiety symptoms were statistically significant and positive at moderate and high levels of thwarted belongingness. In contrast, at low levels of thwarted belongingness, the relationship between microaggressions and anxiety was not statistically significant. Thwarted belongingness also moderated the relationship between interpersonal microaggressions and depression, such that the relation between interpersonal microaggressions and depression was statistically significant and positive only at high and moderate levels.. These findings provide support for recognizing belongingness as a potential factor in determining the effects of microaggressions on mental health outcomes for LGBTQ+ emerging adults.

The meaning and experience of masculinity differs across people and groups, and previous research has demonstrated that such differences are reflected in mental health outcomes. For gay Black men s...

Black LGBTQ+ adults face significant health disparities stemming from intersecting minority stressors. While community belongingness is often theorized as a protective factor, these communities can also be sites of exclusion, creating a complex dynamic. This study’s objective was to test whether community belongingness moderates the relationship between minority stress, operationalized as microaggressions, and subjective well-being in a national sample of Black LGBTQ+ adults. Data were taken from a national online survey of 345 Black LGBTQ+ adults conducted between November 2020 and January 2021. We used validated scales to measure experiences of microaggressions, subjective well-being, and community belongingness. A moderated multiple regression analysis was conducted using the PROCESS macro to test for an interaction effect, controlling for demographic covariates. Minority stress was significantly negatively associated with well-being (b = −0.11, p = 0.005), while community belongingness was positively associated with well-being (b = 0.43, p < 0.001). A significant interaction emerged (b = −0.01, p = 0.021). Simple slopes analysis revealed that the negative relationship between minority stress and well-being was strongest for individuals with high community belongingness (b = −0.18, p < 0.001) and was not significant for those with low belongingness, potentially indicating an exacerbating effect. Contrary to the buffering hypothesis, community belongingness paradoxically amplified the negative impact of minority stress on well-being. This paradox of belonging suggests that highly connected communities may become sites for trauma bonding, which can amplify distress. Public health efforts must focus not only on fostering connection but on building communities that are resourceful, inclusive, and capable of transforming shared experiences into collective empowerment.