Background: Postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of major gastrointestinal surgery with an impact on short- and long-term survival. No validated system for risk stratification exists for this patient group. This study aimed to validate externally a prognostic model for AKI after major gastrointestinal surgery in two multicentre cohort studies. Methods: The Outcomes After Kidney injury in Surgery (OAKS) prognostic model was developed to predict risk of AKI in the 7 days after surgery using six routine datapoints (age, sex, ASA grade, preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate, planned open surgery and preoperative use of either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker). Validation was performed within two independent cohorts: a prospective multicentre, international study (‘IMAGINE’) of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery (2018); and a retrospective regional cohort study (‘Tayside’) in major abdominal surgery (2011–2015). Multivariable logistic regression was used to predict risk of AKI, with multiple imputation used to account for data missing at random. Prognostic accuracy was assessed for patients at high risk (greater than 20 per cent) of postoperative AKI. Results: In the validation cohorts, 12.9 per cent of patients (661 of 5106) in IMAGINE and 14.7 per cent (106 of 719 patients) in Tayside developed 7-day postoperative AKI. Using the OAKS model, 558 patients (9.6 per cent) were classified as high risk. Less than 10 per cent of patients classified as low-risk developed AKI in either cohort (negative predictive value greater than 0.9). Upon external validation, the OAKS model retained an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve of range 0.655–0.681 (Tayside 95 per cent c.i. 0.596 to 0.714; IMAGINE 95 per cent c.i. 0.659 to 0.703), sensitivity values range 0.323–0.352 (IMAGINE 95 per cent c.i. 0.281 to 0.368; Tayside 95 per cent c.i. 0.253 to 0.461), and specificity range 0.881–0.890 (Tayside 95 per cent c.i. 0.853 to 0.905; IMAGINE 95 per cent c.i. 0.881 to 0.899). Conclusion: The OAKS prognostic model can identify patients who are not at high risk of postoperative AKI after gastrointestinal surgery with high specificity. Presented to Association of Surgeons in Training (ASiT) International Conference 2018 (Edinburgh, UK), European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) International Conference 2018 (Nice, France), SARS (Society of Academic and Research Surgery) 2020 (Virtual, UK).

Hemorrhoidal Disease (HD) is widely diffused throughout the general population. The system of classification currently used to categorize this pathology is that of Goligher (1975). Several attempts in literature have been made to refine this classification, but as of yet, no single system has been universally accepted. Some studies, however, have succeeded in identifying specific characteristics, besides morphology, that would be able to aptly define HD. An analysis of the literature, with careful consideration of the scores that have previously been proposed, was performed, with the aim of deepening and stimulating discussion about a possible new definition of HD.

Background/Objectives: Abdominal sepsis remains a major contributor to morbidity and mortality among surgical and critically ill patients worldwide. Timely diagnosis is frequently hindered by the overlapping clinical and biochemical features of postoperative inflammatory responses and evolving intra-abdominal infections, which may resemble systemic sepsis. Conventional biomarkers, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT), are widely implemented in clinical practice but demonstrate suboptimal specificity in differentiating infectious from sterile inflammatory conditions in the early postoperative phase. Presepsin (soluble CD14 subtype, sCD14-ST), a circulating fragment released during monocyte–macrophage activation in response to bacterial endotoxins, has emerged as a biomarker reflecting innate immune engagement. This review aims to critically evaluate the current evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy, prognostic relevance, and potential clinical role of presepsin in abdominal sepsis. Methods: A comprehensive narrative review of the biomedical literature was performed using MEDLINE (via PubMed) and supplementary academic sources. Studies assessing the diagnostic performance, prognostic associations, and clinical applicability of presepsin in abdominal infections, postoperative infectious complications, and sepsis were systematically examined. Where available, comparative analyses with established biomarkers such as CRP and PCT were evaluated to contextualize its incremental value within existing diagnostic frameworks. Results: The accumulated evidence indicates that presepsin concentrations increase early during bacterial infections and correlate with validated severity indices, organ dysfunction scores, and mortality outcomes. Across multiple surgical and intensive care settings, presepsin demonstrated moderate-to-high diagnostic performance, frequently comparable to and occasionally exceeding that of traditional inflammatory biomarkers, particularly in distinguishing septic from non-septic inflammatory states. Moreover, dynamic changes in circulating levels appear to provide additional prognostic information and may support longitudinal clinical assessment. Nonetheless, substantial heterogeneity in study design, patient populations, sampling strategies, and reported cut-off values limits direct cross-study comparability and constrains definitive clinical recommendations. Conclusions: Presepsin represents a biologically plausible and clinically promising biomarker for the early identification and risk stratification of abdominal sepsis. Although current findings are encouraging, further large-scale, methodologically standardized prospective investigations are required to define optimal diagnostic thresholds and to clarify their role within multimodal biomarker strategies in contemporary sepsis management.

Introduction: Diagnosing lymphoma continues to prove challenging in the clinical practice. Composite lymphoma (CL) is defined by the coexistence of different lymphoma subtypes in the same anatomical location. This condition has seldom been witnessed in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. We weren't able to find previous cases in the literature about small bowel CL with follicular lymphoma (FL) and classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL). Surgery is the treatment of choice to obtain accurate histology, to manage and prevent acute complications. We state that this work has been reported in line with the SCARE criteria. Case presentation: We describe an extremely rare case of small bowel CL, presenting as an intestinal bulky mass with circumferential infiltration of bowel loops. The small bowel tumor was incidentally detected by abdominal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in a 64-year-old man who suffered from rectal discomfort and non-specific clinical symptoms. After this radiological finding, the patient underwent multiphase contrast computed tomography (MDCT) for initial staging and to study vascular involvement. Surgery was recommended to obtain an accurate diagnosis both due to initial symptoms of the intestinal obstruction and to avoid small bowel complications. The histopathological examination revealed a small bowel CL composed mainly of B cells FL with also CHL components. Conclusion: It is important to note that involvement of the proximal ileal loops is very rare in small bowel lymphoma. MRI represents a precious diagnostic tool to evaluate the intra and extramural extent of the tumor. Highlights:

Background/Objectives: Abdominal sepsis remains a major contributor to morbidity and mortality among surgical and critically ill patients worldwide. Timely diagnosis is frequently hindered by the overlapping clinical and biochemical features of postoperative inflammatory responses and evolving intra-abdominal infections, which may resemble systemic sepsis. Conventional biomarkers, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT), are widely implemented in clinical practice but demonstrate suboptimal specificity in differentiating infectious from sterile inflammatory conditions in the early postoperative phase. Presepsin (soluble CD14 subtype, sCD14-ST), a circulating fragment released during monocyte–macrophage activation in response to bacterial endotoxins, has emerged as a biomarker reflecting innate immune engagement. This review aims to critically evaluate the current evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy, prognostic relevance, and potential clinical role of presepsin in abdominal sepsis. Methods: A comprehensive narrative review of the biomedical literature was performed using MEDLINE (via PubMed) and supplementary academic sources. Studies assessing the diagnostic performance, prognostic associations, and clinical applicability of presepsin in abdominal infections, postoperative infectious complications, and sepsis were systematically examined. Where available, comparative analyses with established biomarkers such as CRP and PCT were evaluated to contextualize its incremental value within existing diagnostic frameworks. Results: The accumulated evidence indicates that presepsin concentrations increase early during bacterial infections and correlate with validated severity indices, organ dysfunction scores, and mortality outcomes. Across multiple surgical and intensive care settings, presepsin demonstrated moderate-to-high diagnostic performance, frequently comparable to and occasionally exceeding that of traditional inflammatory biomarkers, particularly in distinguishing septic from non-septic inflammatory states. Moreover, dynamic changes in circulating levels appear to provide additional prognostic information and may support longitudinal clinical assessment. Nonetheless, substantial heterogeneity in study design, patient populations, sampling strategies, and reported cut-off values limits direct cross-study comparability and constrains definitive clinical recommendations. Conclusions: Presepsin represents a biologically plausible and clinically promising biomarker for the early identification and risk stratification of abdominal sepsis. Although current findings are encouraging, further large-scale, methodologically standardized prospective investigations are required to define optimal diagnostic thresholds and to clarify its role within multimodal biomarker strategies in contemporary sepsis management.