Machine learning techniques are widely used algorithms for predicting the mechanical properties of concrete. This study is based on the comparison of algorithms between individuals and ensemble approaches, such as bagging. Optimization for bagging is done by making 20 sub-models to depict the accurate one. Variables like cement content, fine and coarse aggregate, water, binder-to-water ratio, fly-ash, and superplasticizer are used for modeling. Model performance is evaluated by various statistical indicators like mean absolute error (MAE), mean square error (MSE), and root mean square error (RMSE). Individual algorithms show a moderate bias result. However, the ensemble model gives a better result with R² = 0.911 compared to the decision tree (DT) and gene expression programming (GEP). K-fold cross-validation confirms the model’s accuracy and is done by R², MAE, MSE, and RMSE. Statistical checks reveal that the decision tree with ensemble provides 25%, 121%, and 49% enhancement for errors like MAE, MSE, and RMSE between the target and outcome response.

High temperature severely affects the nature of the ingredients used to produce concrete, which in turn reduces the strength properties of the concrete. It is a difficult and time-consuming task to achieve the desired compressive strength of concrete. However, the application of supervised machine learning (ML) approaches makes it possible to initially predict the targeted result with high accuracy. This study presents the use of a decision tree (DT), an artificial neural network (ANN), bagging, and gradient boosting (GB) to forecast the compressive strength of concrete at high temperatures on the basis of 207 data points. Python coding in Anaconda navigator software was used to run the selected models. The software requires information regarding both the input variables and the output parameter. A total of nine input parameters (water, cement, coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, fly ash, superplasticizers, silica fume, nano silica, and temperature) were incorporated as the input, while one variable (compressive strength) was selected as the output. The performance of the employed ML algorithms was evaluated with regards to statistical indicators, including the coefficient correlation (R²), mean absolute error (MAE), mean square error (MSE), and root mean square error (RMSE). Individual models using DT and ANN gave R² equal to 0.83 and 0.82, respectively, while the use of the ensemble algorithm and gradient boosting gave R² of 0.90 and 0.88, respectively. This indicates a strong correlation between the actual and predicted outcomes. The k-fold cross-validation, coefficient correlation (R²), and lesser errors (MAE, MSE, and RMSE) showed better performance than the ensemble algorithms. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted in order to check the contribution of each input variable. It has been shown that the use of the ensemble machine learning algorithm would enhance the performance level of the model.

The innovation of geopolymer concrete (GPC) plays a vital role not only in reducing the environmental threat but also as an exceptional material for sustainable development. The application of supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms to forecast the mechanical properties of concrete also has a significant role in developing the innovative environment in the field of civil engineering. This study was based on the use of the artificial neural network (ANN), boosting, and AdaBoost ML approaches, based on the python coding to predict the compressive strength (CS) of high calcium fly-ash-based GPC. The performance comparison of both the employed techniques in terms of prediction reveals that the ensemble ML approaches, AdaBoost, and boosting were more effective than the individual ML technique (ANN). The boosting indicates the highest value of R² equals 0.96, and AdaBoost gives 0.93, while the ANN model was less accurate, indicating the coefficient of determination value equals 0.87. The lesser values of the errors, MAE, MSE, and RMSE of the boosting technique give 1.69 MPa, 4.16 MPa, and 2.04 MPa, respectively, indicating the high accuracy of the boosting algorithm. However, the statistical check of the errors (MAE, MSE, RMSE) and k-fold cross-validation method confirms the high precision of the boosting technique. In addition, the sensitivity analysis was also introduced to evaluate the contribution level of the input parameters towards the prediction of CS of GPC. The better accuracy can be achieved by incorporating other ensemble ML techniques such as AdaBoost, bagging, and gradient boosting.

The casting and testing specimens for determining the mechanical properties of concrete is a time-consuming activity. This study employed supervised machine learning techniques, bagging, AdaBoost, gene expression programming, and decision tree to estimate the compressive strength of concrete containing supplementary cementitious materials (fly ash and blast furnace slag). The performance of the models was compared and assessed using the coefficient of determination (R²), mean absolute error, mean square error, and root mean square error. The performance of the model was further validated using the k-fold cross-validation approach. Compared to the other employed approaches, the bagging model was more effective in predicting results, with an R² value of 0.92. A sensitivity analysis was also prepared to determine the level of contribution of each parameter utilized to run the models. The use of machine learning (ML) techniques to predict the mechanical properties of concrete will be beneficial to the field of civil engineering because it will save time, effort, and resources. The proposed techniques are efficient to forecast the strength properties of concrete containing supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) and pave the way towards the intelligent design of concrete elements and structures.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning are employed in creating functions for the prediction of self-compacting concrete (SCC) strength based on input variables proportion as cement replacement. SCC incorporating waste material has been used in learning approaches. Artificial neural network (ANN) support vector machine (SVM) and gene expression programming (GEP) consisting of 300 datasets have been utilized in the model to foresee the mechanical property of SCC. Data used in modeling consist of several input parameters such as cement, water–binder ratio, coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, and fly ash (FA) in combination with the superplasticizer. The best predictive models were selected based on the coefficient of determination (R²) results and model validation. Empirical relation with mathematical expression has been proposed using ANN, SVM, and GEP. The efficiency of the models is assessed by permutation features importance, statistical analysis, and comparison between regression models. The results reveal that the proposed machine learning models achieved adamant accuracy and has elucidated performance in the prediction aspect.