Susanta Kumar Jena

Susanta Kumar Jena

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Susanta Kumar Jena


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 July 2026
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
SJSusanta Kumar Jena
Susanta Kumar Jena
KBKalpesh Borse
Kalpesh Borse

30 October 2025 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABINASH DALAIABINASH DALAI
ABINASH DALAI
MTMahendra Prasad Tripathi
Mahendra Prasad Tripathi
AMAtmaram Mishra
Atmaram Mishra
SJSusanta Kumar Jena
Susanta Kumar Jena
MJMuralitharan Jothimani
Muralitharan Jothimani
JNJAGDEEP KUMAR NAYAK
JAGDEEP KUMAR NAYAK
In the eastern part of India, specifically in the coastal districts of Odisha, the Puri central canalsystem’s Phulnakhara distributary command, which is split between the districts of Cuttack and Khurda, is where the study was taken up during 2020 and 2021. The flow modelling of the Phulnakhara distributary command, covering a 49.03 km2 area, was done by Visual MODFLOW (VMOD). The command area’s conceptual model was created by assigning various input data, and the developed model was calibrated with 1-year data (2020) and validated with 1-year data (2021) on a fortnightly basis for simulating the groundwater flow using VMOD. Both steady state and transient state circumstances were used to calibrate the hydraulic conductivity and storage coefficient for the various layers in 2020. The calibrated hydraulic conductivity values vary from 1.16 × 10−3 ms−1 to 4.86 × 10−4 ms−1, and the calibrated values (2.00 × 10−2 m−1 to 4.00 × 10−6 m−1) of specific storage varied from the first to third layer in both state scenarios. The validated model could forecast the groundwater condition and the flow head for the following ten years, assuming a 0.5% annual drop in recharge by increasing the pumping rate five, six, and seven times throughout the validation period (2021). The modelling study suggested that the command area will not remain safe for 10 years from the point of future groundwater development. The model performance showed strong agreement between simulated and observed groundwater heads, with R2 values ranging from 0.68 to 0.91 and NSE values between 0.64 and 0.88. Predictive simulations indicated groundwater drawdowns of 4.82 m, 5.72 m, and 6.11 m under 5×, 6×, and 7× pumping scenarios, respectively, over the next decade, highlighting a significant risk of depletion unless conjunctive use strategies are adopted.