Benson Honig

Prof. Benson Honig

DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M4, Canada

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2003 in Journal of Business Venturing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDPer Davidsson
Per Davidsson
Benson HonigBenson Honig
Benson Honig

1 September 2009 in Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IDIsrael Drori
Israel Drori
Benson HonigBenson Honig
Benson Honig
MWMike Wright
Mike Wright

12 March 2013 in Organization Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IDIsrael Drori
Israel Drori
Benson HonigBenson Honig
Benson Honig
We report the results of a longitudinal case study depicting the relationship between internal and external legitimacy at Orion, an emergent creative professional firm. We address the following questions: How do different types of legitimacy emerge, and how do they interact to shape organizational evolution? Introducing a staged process model, we demonstrate that organizational legitimacy is a product of action, which is continually reproduced and reconstructed by members of an organization in concert with external legitimation activities. Internal and external legitimacy evolve through a process of emergence, validation, diffusion and consensus, sometimes recursively repeating the cycle when imbalances result in conflict and friction.


1 January 2004 in International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAna Maria Peredo
Ana Maria Peredo
RARobert B. Anderson
Robert B. Anderson
CGCraig S. Galbraith
Craig S. Galbraith
Benson HonigBenson Honig
Benson Honig
Leo Paul DanaLeo Paul Dana
Leo Paul Dana
Indigenous populations throughout the world suffer from chronic poverty, lower education levels, and poor health. The ''second wave'' of indigenous development, after direct economic assistance from outside, lies in indigenous efforts to rebuild their ''nations'' and improve their lot through entrepreneurial enterprise. This paper suggests that there is a distinguishable kind of activity appropriately called ''indigenous entrepreneurship''. We begin by defining the indigenous population and noting some general facts about their numbers and distribution. In an effort to discern the potential for development on indigenous peoples' own terms, we then explore three frameworks for understanding efforts at development, including indigenous development: modernisation theory, dependency theory and (at somewhat greater length) regulation theory. After distinguishing ''indigenous'' from ''ethnic'' entrepreneurship, we conclude by identifying a number of lead questions that present themselves at the outset of an enquiry into the nature of indigenous entrepreneurship.

1 September 2005 in Journal of Business Venturing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GCGaylen N. Chandler
Gaylen N. Chandler
Benson HonigBenson Honig
Benson Honig
JWJohan Wiklund
Johan Wiklund