ARIS PSILOVIKOS

Prof. ARIS PSILOVIKOS

Sustainable Water Resources Management, Department of Ichthyology and Aquatic Environment, School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Thessaly, Odos Fytokou, N. Ionia Magnisias 38446, Greece
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 May 2011 in Water Resources Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Mohamed ElhagMohamed Elhag
Mohamed Elhag
ARIS PSILOVIKOSARIS PSILOVIKOS
ARIS PSILOVIKOS
IMIoannis Manakos
Ioannis Manakos
KPKostas Perakis
Kostas Perakis

5 May 2009 in Water Resources Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NMN. Mantzafleri
N. Mantzafleri
ARIS PSILOVIKOSARIS PSILOVIKOS
ARIS PSILOVIKOS
ABA. Blanta
A. Blanta

31 January 2020 in Environment, Development and Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Mohamed ElhagMohamed Elhag
Mohamed Elhag
Ioannis Z. GitasIoannis Z. Gitas
Ioannis Z. Gitas
AOAnas Othman
Anas Othman
JARBOU BAHRAWIJARBOU BAHRAWI
JARBOU BAHRAWI
ARIS PSILOVIKOSARIS PSILOVIKOS
ARIS PSILOVIKOS
NANassir Suleiman Al-Amri
Nassir Suleiman Al-Amri

28 November 2021 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LKLina Karamoutsou
Lina Karamoutsou
ARIS PSILOVIKOSARIS PSILOVIKOS
ARIS PSILOVIKOS
The effects of climate change on water resources management have drawn worldwide attention. Water quality predictions that are both reliable and precise are critical for an effective water resources management. Although nonlinear biological and chemical processes occurring in a lake make prediction complex, advanced techniques are needed to develop reliable models and effective management systems. Artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the most recent methods for modeling complex structures. The applications of machine learning (ML), as a part of AI, in hydrology and water resources management have been increasing in recent years. In this paper, the ability of deep neural networks (DNNs) to predict the quality parameter of dissolved oxygen (DO), in Lake Kastoria, Greece, is tested. The available dataset from 11 November 2015, to 15 March 2018, on an hourly basis, from four telemetric stations located in the study area consists of (1) Chl-a (μg/L), (2) pH, (3) temperature—Tw (°C), (4) conductivity (μS/cm), (5) turbidity (NTU), (6) ammonia (NH4, mg/L), (7) nitrate nitrogen (N–NO3, mg/L), and (8) dissolved oxygen (DO) (mg/L). Feed-forward deep neural networks (FF-DNNs) of DO, with different structures, are tested for all stations. All the well-trained DNNs give satisfactory results. The optimal selected FF-DNNs of DO for each station with a high efficiency (NSE > 0.89 for optimal selected structures/station) constitute a good choice for modeling dissolved oxygen. Moreover, they provide information in real time and comprise a powerful decision support system (DSS) for preventing accidental and emergency conditions that may arise from both natural and anthropogenic hazards.

5 May 2009 in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARIS PSILOVIKOSARIS PSILOVIKOS
ARIS PSILOVIKOS
SMSofia Margoni
Sofia Margoni

7 January 2016 in Desalination and Water Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ASAntonis Sentas
Antonis Sentas
ARIS PSILOVIKOSARIS PSILOVIKOS
ARIS PSILOVIKOS
TPThomas Psilovikos
Thomas Psilovikos
NMNiki Matzafleri
Niki Matzafleri
This study presents the development and validation of three different stochastic models on the basis of (a) their efficiency to forecast and (b) their ability to utilize auxiliary environmental information. The three models are ARIMA models, transfer function (TF) models, and artificial neural networks. Four-year (2004–2007) daily measurements of dissolved oxygen at four different depths (1, 20, 40 and 70 m) of Thesaurus dam-lake in River Nestos, Eastern Macedonia, Greece, were used to obtain the best models for these time series. For the final selected models, four statistical criteria (mean square error (MSE), roοt-mean-square error (RMSE), MAPE, and NSC) were used to evaluate the accuracy of the forecast and to compare the forecasting ability for one step ahead of each approach. For 1- and 20-m depth, the best forecast is obtained by ARIMA models, while for the 40-m depth, TF models gives the best forecast. Finally for the 70-m depth, according to the MSE, RMSE, and NSC statistical criteria, ARIMA models are the best, while for the MAPE, TF models are the best. Further research could be carried out concerning on (a) the comparison of these models with other forecasting ones, (b) the application of forecasting for more than one step ahead (m = 2, 3, …), and (c) the implementation of such models in other deep lakes and the assessment of the comparison between them.