Giuseppe Rizzo

Prof. Giuseppe Rizzo

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Lazio, Italy
orcid
Full Professor Chairman Department of Obstetrics and Gynecol...

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

41Years (1986-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2020 in American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDaniele Di Mascio
Daniele Di Mascio
AKAsma Khalil
Asma Khalil
GSGabriele Saccone
Gabriele Saccone
Giuseppe RizzoGiuseppe Rizzo
Giuseppe Rizzo
DBDanilo Buca
Danilo Buca
FDFrancesco D’aNtonio
Francesco D’aNtonio

1 January 1990 in Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DADomenico Arduini
Domenico Arduini
Giuseppe RizzoGiuseppe Rizzo
Giuseppe Rizzo
In a cross-sectional study of 1556 uncomplicated pregnancies velocity waveforms were recorded at the level of fetal umbilical artery, descending aorta, renal artery, internal carotid artery and middle cerebral artery. Reference limits for the Pulsatility Index of each vessel were constructed by regression analysis and a progressive fall during gestation was evidenced in all the vascular districts investigated with the exception of descending aorta. Furthermore we calculated the ratios between Pulsatility Index values of cerebral and peripheral vessels which may be relevant for the early diagnosis of the haemodynamic abnormalities occurring during the brain sparing effect.

10 January 2022 in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLChristoph Lees
Christoph Lees
RRRoberto Romero
Roberto Romero
TSTamara Stampalija
Tamara Stampalija
ADAndrea Dall'Asta
Andrea Dall'Asta
GDGreggory R. DeVore
Greggory R. DeVore
KHKurt Hecher
Kurt Hecher

29 June 2020 in Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IMIlenia Mappa
Ilenia Mappa
FDFlavia Adalgisa Distefano
Flavia Adalgisa Distefano
Giuseppe RizzoGiuseppe Rizzo
Giuseppe Rizzo
Objectives: Coronavirus (COVID-19) is a new respiratory disease that is spreading widely throughout the world. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on pregnant women in Italy. Methods: We considered 200 pregnancies attending our antenatal clinic. A questionnaire was sent to each woman in the days of maximum spread of COVID-19. Sectional was finalized to acquire in 18 items maternal characteristics and to test the women’s perception of infection. Section included the State–trait anxiety inventory (STAI) 40 items validated test for scoring trait anxiety (basal anxiety, STAI-T) and state anxiety (related to the ongoing pandemic, STAI-S). An abnormal value of STAI was considered when ≥40. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 178 women (89%). Fear that COVID-19 could induce fetal structural anomalies was present in 47%, fetal growth restriction in 65% and preterm birth in 51% of the women. The median value of STAI-T was 37 and in 38.2% of the study group STAI-T score ≥40 was evidenced. STAI-S values were significantly higher with an increase of median values of 12 points (p≤0.0001). There was a positive linear correlation between STAI-T and STAI-S (Pearson=0.59; p≤0.0001). A higher educational status was associated with increased prevalence of STAI-S ≥ 40(p=0.004). Subgrouping women by the other variables considered did not show any further difference. Conclusions: COVID-19 pandemic induces a doubling of the number of women who reached abnormal level of anxiety. These findings validate the role of the remote use of questionnaire for identifying women at higher risk of anxiety disorders allowing the activation of support procedures.

1 May 2017 in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GSGabriele Saccone
Gabriele Saccone
VBVincenzo Berghella
Vincenzo Berghella
GMGiuseppe Maria Maruotti
Giuseppe Maria Maruotti
TGTullio Ghi
Tullio Ghi
Giuseppe RizzoGiuseppe Rizzo
Giuseppe Rizzo
PMPasquale Martinelli
Pasquale Martinelli

21 February 2017 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AFAlessandra Familiari
Alessandra Familiari
Morlando MaddalenaMorlando Maddalena
Morlando Maddalena
AKAsma Khalil
Asma Khalil
SSSven-Erik Sonesson
Sven-Erik Sonesson
CSCarolina Scala
Carolina Scala
FDFrancesco D'Antonio
Francesco D'Antonio
Background: Prenatal diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta (CoA) is still challenging and affected by high rates of false-positive diagnoses. The aim of this study was to ascertain the strength of association and to quantify the diagnostic accuracy of different ultrasound signs in predicting CoA prenatally. Methods: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched. Random-effects and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model meta-analyses were used to analyze the data. Results: Seven hundred ninety-four articles were identified, and 12 (922 fetuses at risk for CoA) articles were included. Mean mitral valve diameter z score was lower ( P <0.001) and the mean tricuspid valve diameter z score was higher in fetuses with CoA than in those without CoA ( P =0.01). Mean aortic valve diameter z score was lower in fetuses with CoA than in healthy fetuses ( P ≤0.001), but the ascending aorta diameter, expressed as z score or millimeters, was similar between groups ( P =0.07 and 0.47, respectively). Mean aortic isthmus diameter z scores measured either in sagittal ( P =0.02) or in 3-vessel trachea view ( P <0.001) were lower in fetuses with CoA. Conversely, the mean pulmonary artery diameter z score, the right/left ventricular and pulmonary artery/ascending aorta diameter ratios were higher ( P <0.001, P =0.02, and P =0.02, respectively) in fetuses with CoA in comparison with controls, although aortic isthmus/arterial duct diameter ratio was lower in fetuses with CoA than in those without CoA ( P <0.001). The presence of coarctation shelf and aortic arch hypoplasia were more common in fetuses with CoA than in controls (odds ratio, 26.0; 95% confidence interval, 4.42–153; P <0.001 and odds ratio, 38.2; 95% confidence interval, 3.01–486; P =0.005), whereas persistent left superior vena cava ( P =0.85), ventricular septal defect ( P =0.12), and bicuspid aortic valve ( P =0.14) did not carry an increased risk for this anomaly. Multiparametric diagnostic models integrating different ultrasound signs for the detection of CoA were associated with an increased detection rate. Conclusions: The detection rate of CoA may improve when a multiple-criteria prediction model is adopted. Further large multicenter studies sharing the same imaging protocols are needed to develop objective models for risk assessment in these fetuses.