Hannes Vanpoecke

Mr. Hannes Vanpoecke

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 July 2025 in Iris Journal of Nursing & Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PRPaul De Raeve
Paul De Raeve
Hannes VanpoeckeHannes Vanpoecke
Hannes Vanpoecke
MBManuel Ballotta
Manuel Ballotta
AXAndreas Xyrichis
Andreas Xyrichis
YDYannai DeJonghe
Yannai DeJonghe
IŽIvana Žilić
Ivana Žilić
Safe staffing levels (SSL) are essential to ensuring patient safety, nurse well-being, and health system resilience.

28 October 2025 in Journal of Cancer Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NBNadine Boesten
Nadine Boesten
MRMelissa De Regge
Melissa De Regge
Hannes VanpoeckeHannes Vanpoecke
Hannes Vanpoecke
MLMark Leys
Mark Leys
KEKristof Eeckloo
Kristof Eeckloo
PGPaul Gemmel
Paul Gemmel

20 October 2026 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Hannes VanpoeckeHannes Vanpoecke
Hannes Vanpoecke
KPKaat De Pourcq
Kaat De Pourcq
PGPaul Gemmel
Paul Gemmel
BMBert Meijboom
Bert Meijboom
MRMelissa De Regge
Melissa De Regge
Background/Objectives: Scanxiety, the distress associated with cancer surveillance imaging, is a common concern among cancer survivors. Although most research has focused on the imaging event itself, less is known about how scanxiety unfolds throughout the broader cancer surveillance journey. This study aimed to map the cancer surveillance journey of cancer survivors and identify patient-centred intervention opportunities to reduce scanxiety. Methods: We used a qualitative participatory design involving cancer survivors, travelling companions, and healthcare professionals. Nine co-creation workshops were conducted; in six survivors and companions participated in journey-mapping exercises, while in three, healthcare professionals completed an immersive exercise. All groups subsequently engaged in structured brainstorming workshops to generate intervention opportunities. Data were analysed using abductive thematic analysis. Results: Scanxiety extended beyond the imaging procedure and unfolded throughout the cancer surveillance journey, spanning three phases and seven subphases. Participants identified opportunities to redesign the journey by enhancing existing touchpoints, augmenting the journey with additional touchpoints, and eliminating unnecessary or stress-inducing touchpoints. These opportunities targeted interpersonal, technical, environmental, and administrative dimensions of care. Administrative qualities, particularly timeliness and operational processes, emerged as important contributors to distress. Preferences for support and communication varied, underscoring the need for flexible supportive care during medical surveillance. Conclusions: Scanxiety is a journey-wide experience shaped by both individual and organisational factors. Opportunities to address scan-related distress may include not only psychosocial support, but also improvements in how surveillance care is organised and delivered. The findings provide a patient-centred approach for redesigning cancer surveillance services and identifying intervention opportunities for future evaluation.